Cited by 60Embodied and Extended CognitionFree Will and AgencyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Action is enabled by systematic misrepresentations

Wiese, Wanja·2017·Erkenntnis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10670-016-9867-x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Action initiation involves systematic misrepresentation whereby proprioceptive evidence that the body is not moving is attenuated to allow the system to bring about the desired movement.

    “Action initiation involves ‘systematic misrepresentation’ (Wiese 2017)—whereby proprioceptive evidence that, for instance, my arm is not moving, is attenuated to allow the system to bring about the desired movement (Adams et al. 2013; Brown et al. 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiese, W.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Wiese, Wanja
Venue
Erkenntnis
Published
2016-12-20
Volume
82
Issue
6
Pages
1233-1252
ISSN
  • 0165-0106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8420
OpenAlex
W2563109517
Cited by
60
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Erkenntnis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
active inference, predictive processing, action representation, ideomotor theory, top-down modulation, sensory prediction error, sensory attenuation, proprioception, force matching, misrepresentation, inference to the best explanation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review