Cited by 55Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Filamentous growth is a general feature of Candida auris clinical isolates

Open access
Fan, Shuru, Yue, Huizhen, Zheng, Qiushi, Bing, Jian, Tian, Sufei, Chen, Jingjing, Ennis, Craig L, Nobile, Clarissa J +2 more·2021·Medical Mycology

Abstract

A striking feature of pathogenic Candida species is morphological plasticity that facilitates environmental adaptation and host infection. Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen first described in Japan in 2009. In this study, we demonstrate that clinical isolates of C. auris have multiple colony and cellular morphologies including the yeast, filamentous, aggregated, and elongated forms. This phenotypic diversity has been observed in eight clinical isolates of C. auris representing four major genetic clades, suggesting that it could be a general characteristic. We further demonstrate that different cell types of C. auris exhibit distinct antifungal resistance and virulence properties in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Our findings imply that morphological diversity is an important biological feature of C. auris and could be a contributor to its emergence and rapid prevalence worldwide. Lay Summary: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. Morphological analyses indicate that filamentation is a general feature of clinical isolates of C. auris. This ability is associated with antifungal resistance and virulence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mmy/myaa116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, S., Yue, H., Zheng, Q., Bing, J., Tian, S., Chen, J., Ennis, C. L., Nobile, C. J., Huang, G., & Du, H.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Du, Han
Venue
Medical Mycology
Published
2021-01-23
Volume
59
Issue
7
Pages
734-740
ISSN
  • 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-3786
  • 1460-2709
OpenAlex
W3121426084
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Mycology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002123, 31625002, 31930005)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM124594)
  • National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (F31DE028488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida auris, filamentation, morphological plasticity, yeast-to-hypha transition, antifungal resistance, virulence, Galleria mellonella infection model, clinical isolates, genetic clades, emerging fungal pathogens, multidrug resistance
MeSH terms
Animals, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Larva, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Moths, Phenotype, Virulence, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review