The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Depolarization of Discrete Radio Sources by Faraday Dispersion
Abstract
A study is made of the implications of the recent polarization measurements for the structures of discrete radio sources and the source–observer media. Simple models of wavelength-dependent depolarizing mechanisms are investigated and it is found that most are incompatible with the observations of Gardner & Whiteoak. The models of internal Faraday dispersion predict a lower polarization at 30 cm than is observed. It is suggested that the depolarization of the Crab nebula is produced by Faraday rotation in the filamentary shell that surrounds the nebula. Such filaments could also exist in the outer regions of extragalactic sources. A complex number representation is used for the state of linear polarization and a Faraday dispersion function is defined to describe the distribution of polarized radiation with respect to Faraday depth. The persistence of polarization at 30 cm, after partial depolarization between 10 cm and 20 cm, implies that the radiation is spread over a large range of Faraday depths. The observed linearity of the plot of the angle of polarization against wavelength squared for most sources implies that it is justifiable to make an assumption which enables one to calculate the Faraday dispersion function of a source from the dependence of its polarization on wavelength. Estimates are given for upper limits to the densities of internal ionized gases in the sources for which we have polarization measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Three‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: Polarization Analysis
Page, L., Hinshaw, G., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Bennett, C. L., Barnes, C., Bean, R., Dore, O., Dunkley, J., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/513699 · Cited by 1,380
Clusters of galaxies: observational properties of the diffuse radio emission
Feretti, L., Giovannini, G., Govoni, F., & Murgia, M. (2012) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-012-0054-z · Cited by 667
MAGNETIC FIELDS IN CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES
GOVONI, F., & FERETTI, L. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271804005080 · Cited by 486
A New Model for the Loop I (North Polar Spur) Region
Wolleben, M. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/518711 · Cited by 142
“In this case, polarization vectors with different orientation may superimpose and cancel each other (see also Burn 1966). not take irregular or turbulent B-field components into account.”
Backgroundvan Weeren, R. J., Röttgering, H. J. A., Intema, H. T., Rudnick, L., Brüggen, M., Hoeft, M., & Oonk, J. B. R. (2012) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219000 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Burn, B. J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1966-07-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-83
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2057209307
- Cited by
- 1,023
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Depolarization of Discrete Radio Sources by Faraday Dispersion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/133.1.67
- The paper
- Burn, B. J. (1966). On the Depolarization of Discrete Radio Sources by Faraday Dispersion. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/133.1.67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.