Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Massive Central Black Holes on Dense Stellar Systems

Open access
Frank, J., Rees, M. J.·1976·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We discuss some dynamical and astrophysical consequences of the presence of a massive black hole, of mass Mh in a dense stellar system, applying our results to the cores of globular clusters and to galactic nuclei. The black hole would dominate the dynamics of stars out to a radius |${r}_\text{h}\,\simeq \,{GM}_\text{h}/{\upsilon}_c\,^{2},\,{\upsilon }_{c}$| being the velocity dispersion in the core. Within rh, the stellar velocity dispersion is proportional to r–1/2 and the stellar density n(r) may be enhanced. A quasisteady state can be established, involving a steady influx of stars which are swallowed or disrupted near the hole. We define and calculate a ‘critical radius’ rcrit such that most stars on orbits with |$r\,\lesssim\,{r}_\text{crit}$| diffuse into lowangular momentum ‘loss-cone ’ orbits (and are swallowed) in the ‘reference time ’ tR; whereas outside rcrit, loss-cone effects are negligible and a typical star diffuses inward into a more tightly-bound orbit on a time scale |$\sim {t}_\text{R}({r}/{r}_\text{crit})$|⁠. The density profile in the cusp is |$n\text(r)\,\propto \,{r}^{-7/4}\,\text{for}\,{r}_{crit}\,\lesssim\,r\,\lesssim\,{r}_\text{h};$| and somewhat flatter inside rcrit. Generally rcrit is larger than either the tidal radius rT of the hole or the ‘collision radius ’ rcoll at which |${GM}_\text{h}/{r}_\text{coll}$| equals the binding energy per unit mass of a typical star: indeed, in some cases |${r}_\text{crit}\,\gtrsim\,{r}_\text{h}.$| The swallowing or disruption rate of stars varies as M4/3 when |${r}_\text{crit}\,\gtrsim\,{r}_\text{h},$|M61/27 when |${r}_\text{h}\,\lesssim\,{r}_\text{crit}\,\lesssim{r}_\text{coll}$| and M3 when |${r}_\text{crit}\,\lesssim\,{r}_\text{coll.}$| We discuss some consequences of stellar disruption and tidal capture by black holes of |${10}^{3-}\,{10}^{4}\,{M}_{\odot}$| in globular clusters: X-ray emission, possible optical or ultraviolet ‘flares ’, and the likelihood of there being a captured star in orbit near rT. Finally, we briefly apply our considerations to Hills' quasar model, which invokes |$\gtrsim\,{10}^{7}\,{M}_{\odot}$| black holes in galactic nuclei.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/176.3.633

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Frank, J., & Rees, M. J.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1976-09-01
Volume
176
Issue
3
Pages
633-647
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2080998747
Cited by
522
References
0
FWCI
10.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Massive Central Black Holes on Dense Stellar Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/176.3.633
The paper
Frank, J., & Rees, M. J. (1976). Effects of Massive Central Black Holes on Dense Stellar Systems. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/176.3.633

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.