Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 923

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters

Open access
Rees, M. J., Ostriker, J. P.·1977·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We investigate the extent to which the characteristic masses and sizes of galaxies (and clusters) are determined by processes occurring at the epoch when the pregalactic material has stopped expanding with the background Universe but has not yet fragmented into stars. Unless pregalactic clouds collapse in an exceedingly homogeneous fashion, their kinetic energy of infall will be thermalized via shocks before the contraction has proceeded by more than a factor ~ 2. What happens next depends on the relative value of the cooling and collapse timescales. Masses in the range |$10^{10} - 10^{12} M_{\odot}$| cool so efficiently that they always collapse at the free-fall rate, and probably quickly fragment into stars. Larger masses, however, may experience a quasistatic contraction phase; and go into free fall (and fragment) only after their radii fall below a critical value rbc. For masses ⪢ |$10^{12} M_{\odot}, r_\text{bc}$| has a mass-independent value ~ 75 kpc. We argue that this characteristic mass and radius may indeed be crucial determinants of the properties of galaxies, and discuss various complications that should be included in more refined calculations. Large masses ( ~ 1014M⊙) which recollapse at recent epochs may be unable to cool at all; and there is no reason why galaxies of characteristic radii |$\lesssim r_\text{bc}$| should not still be forming at small redshifts. The typical giant galaxies which dominate the luminosity function must have formed at a relatively recent epoch |$z \lesssim 10.$| Opacity effects in collapsing protogalaxies are briefly discussed, the possibility that trapped Lyman a may inhibit fragmentation being the only important one. The effects of mass-dependent dissipation on clustering and the covariance function are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/179.4.541

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 923

Metadata

Authors
Rees, M. J., & Ostriker, J. P.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1977-08-01
Volume
179
Issue
4
Pages
541-559
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2315647678
Cited by
923
References
0
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/179.4.541
The paper
Rees, M. J., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977). Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.4.541

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.