The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the extent to which the characteristic masses and sizes of galaxies (and clusters) are determined by processes occurring at the epoch when the pregalactic material has stopped expanding with the background Universe but has not yet fragmented into stars. Unless pregalactic clouds collapse in an exceedingly homogeneous fashion, their kinetic energy of infall will be thermalized via shocks before the contraction has proceeded by more than a factor ~ 2. What happens next depends on the relative value of the cooling and collapse timescales. Masses in the range |$10^{10} - 10^{12} M_{\odot}$| cool so efficiently that they always collapse at the free-fall rate, and probably quickly fragment into stars. Larger masses, however, may experience a quasistatic contraction phase; and go into free fall (and fragment) only after their radii fall below a critical value rbc. For masses ⪢ |$10^{12} M_{\odot}, r_\text{bc}$| has a mass-independent value ~ 75 kpc. We argue that this characteristic mass and radius may indeed be crucial determinants of the properties of galaxies, and discuss various complications that should be included in more refined calculations. Large masses ( ~ 1014M⊙) which recollapse at recent epochs may be unable to cool at all; and there is no reason why galaxies of characteristic radii |$\lesssim r_\text{bc}$| should not still be forming at small redshifts. The typical giant galaxies which dominate the luminosity function must have formed at a relatively recent epoch |$z \lesssim 10.$| Opacity effects in collapsing protogalaxies are briefly discussed, the possibility that trapped Lyman a may inhibit fragmentation being the only important one. The effects of mass-dependent dissipation on clustering and the covariance function are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Self-citationThe Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Reddy, N. A., & Steidel, C. C. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/692/1/778 · Cited by 555
The anthropic principle and the structure of the physical world
Carr, B. J., & Rees, M. J. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/278605a0 · Cited by 438
Self-citationDimensionless constants, cosmology, and other dark matters
Tegmark, M., Aguirre, A., Rees, M. J., & Wilczek, F. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.023505 · Cited by 401
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rees, M. J., & Ostriker, J. P.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1977-08-01
- Volume
- 179
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-559
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2315647678
- Cited by
- 923
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/179.4.541
- The paper
- Rees, M. J., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977). Cooling, dynamics and fragmentation of massive gas clouds: clues to the masses and radii of galaxies and clusters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.4.541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.