The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biased clustering in the cold dark matter cosmogony
Open accessAbstract
We have used the Press–Schechter approximation to calculate the abundance and large-scale clustering of dark haloes in the CDM cosmogony. Applying these results to quasars at z = 3−4, we find a wide range of haloes which are both sufficiently massive and sufficiently numerous to host quasars, and the prediction for the clustering strength is correspondingly uncertain. Current estimates of quasar clustering require that the parent haloes lie at the most massive end of the allowed range, with velocity dispersions in the range 550−900 km s−1, and that the quasar luminosity be quite tightly correlated with the parent halo properties. Another application is to the diffuse X-ray background. If this is generated by discrete sources associated with dark haloes then the upper limits on the X-ray angular correlation function constrain the halo masses to be |$\lt 10^{12} \enspace h^{-1} \enspace M_\odot$|. We have considered two simple models for galaxy formation. In the first, which has some attractions for disc galaxies, we identify galaxies with dark haloes forming at the present epoch. We find that haloes with abundance like that of |$L_\ast$| galaxies have large-scale clustering which is nearly unbiased, and the smaller haloes are antibiased — quite a negative feature. In the second, the galaxies we see today are assumed to be a fossil remnant of haloes which formed earlier. The stellar and dark particle velocity dispersions are assumed to be equal, and the luminosity for each halo is adjusted to give a tight and universal L–V relation like that observed. We identify an epoch when the comoving number density of haloes with a given luminosity is maximized, and we calculate how this number density is biased by long wavelength modes. The results here are more encouraging: All of the ‘galaxies’ in this model are positively biased. The enhancement of the light-to-mass ratios for rich clusters is substantial, though dependent on the normalization. For a low normalization the bias is strong enough to reconcile virial estimates of M/L for clusters with Ω = 1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
THE LARGE-SCALE BIAS OF DARK MATTER HALOS: NUMERICAL CALIBRATION AND MODEL TESTS
Tinker, J. L., Robertson, B. E., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Warren, M. S., Yepes, G., & Gottlöber, S. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/2/878 · Cited by 989
Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., & Lemson, G. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x · Cited by 909
Kravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, S., & Kaiser, N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-04-01
- Volume
- 237
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1127-1146
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2085387831
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biased clustering in the cold dark matter cosmogony. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/237.4.1127
- The paper
- Cole, S., & Kaiser, N. (1989). Biased clustering in the cold dark matter cosmogony. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/237.4.1127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.