Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 909

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation

Open access
Boylan-Kolchin, Michael, Springel, Volker, White, Simon D. M., Jenkins, Adrian, Lemson, Gerard·2009·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present the Millennium-II Simulation (MS-II), a very large N-body simulation of dark matter evolution in the concordance cold dark matter ( CDM) cosmology.The MS-II assumes the same cosmological parameters and uses the same particle number and output data structure as the original Millennium Simulation (MS), but was carried out in a periodic cube one-fifth the size (100 h -1 Mpc) with five times better spatial resolution (a Plummer equivalent softening of 1.0 h -1 kpc) and with 125 times better mass resolution (a particle mass of 6.9 × 10 6 h -1 M ).By comparing results at MS and MS-II resolution, we demonstrate excellent convergence in dark matter statistics such as the halo mass function, the subhalo abundance distribution, the mass dependence of halo formation times, the linear and non-linear autocorrelations and power spectra, and halo assembly bias.Together, the two simulations provide precise results for such statistics over an unprecedented range of scales, from haloes similar to those hosting Local Group dwarf spheroidal galaxies to haloes corresponding to the richest galaxy clusters.The 'Milky Way' haloes of the Aquarius Project were selected from a lower resolution version of the MS-II and were then resimulated at much higher resolution.As a result, they are present in the MS-II along with thousands of other similar mass haloes.A comparison of their assembly histories in the MS-II and in resimulations of 1000 times better resolution shows detailed agreement over a factor of 100 in mass growth.We publicly release halo catalogues and assembly trees for the MS-II in the same format within the same archive as those already released for the MS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 909

Metadata

Authors
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., & Lemson, G.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2009-09-21
Volume
398
Issue
3
Pages
1150-1164
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2104246757
Cited by
909
References
2
FWCI
31.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x
The paper
Boylan-Kolchin, M., Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., & Lemson, G. (2009). Resolving cosmic structure formation with the Millennium-II Simulation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.