Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ghostly streams from the formation of the Galaxy’s halo

Lynden-Bell, D., Lynden-Bell, R. M.·1995·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

A new method of analysis yields streams of globular clusters likely to trace the orbits of satellites that may have long since merged with the Galaxy. Besides the streams associated with the Magellanic Clouds and Fornax, new ones associated with the recently discovered remnant in Sagittarius and other possible streams of the outer-halo globular clusters are suggested. Only a few of these suggested streams will be true, but they can be tested because we are able to determine the orbits and predict the proper motions of each cluster. These predicted proper motions which are greater than 1 mas yr–1 for 22 objects are given in Table 3 and Appendix B.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/275.2.429

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 315

Metadata

Authors
Lynden-Bell, D., & Lynden-Bell, R. M.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1995-07
Volume
275
Issue
2
Pages
429-442
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W1678408431
Cited by
315
References
0
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ghostly streams from the formation of the Galaxy’s halo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/275.2.429
The paper
Lynden-Bell, D., & Lynden-Bell, R. M. (1995). Ghostly streams from the formation of the Galaxy’s halo. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/275.2.429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.