The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring the cosmological constant with redshift surveys
Open accessAbstract
It has been proposed that the cosmological constant $Λ$ might be measured from geometric effects on large-scale structure. A positive vacuum density leads to correlation-function contours which are squashed in the radial direction when calculated assuming a matter-dominated model. We show that this effect will be somewhat harder to detect than previous calculations have suggested: the squashing factor is likely to be $<1.3$, given realistic constraints on the matter contribution to $Ω$. Moreover, the geometrical distortion risks being confused with the redshift-space distortions caused by the peculiar velocities associated with the growth of galaxy clustering. These depend on the density and bias parameters via the combination $β\equiv Ω^{0.6}/b$, and we show that the main practical effect of a geometrical flattening factor $F$ is to simulate gravitational instability with $β_{\rm eff}\simeq 0.5(F-1)$. Nevertheless, with datasets of sufficient size it is possible to distinguish the two effects; we discuss in detail how this should be done. New-generation redshift surveys of galaxies and quasars are potentially capable of detecting a non-zero vacuum density, if it exists at a cosmologically interesting level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe
(2007) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73478-9_2 · Cited by 3,219
Cited by
Carroll, S. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1 · Cited by 2,650
Cole, S., Percival, W. J., Peacock, J. A., Norberg, P., Baugh, C. M., Frenk, C. S., Baldry, I., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R., et al. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x · Cited by 2,094
Self-citationLarge-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Alam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ballinger, W. E., Peacock, J. A., & Heavens, A. F.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 877-888
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2005013882
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the cosmological constant with redshift surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/282.3.877
- The paper
- Ballinger, W. E., Peacock, J. A., & Heavens, A. F. (1996). Measuring the cosmological constant with redshift surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/282.3.877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.