Cited by 36Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaCosmology and Gravitation Theories

Differentiable strong lensing: uniting gravity and neural nets through differentiable probabilistic programming

Open access
Chianese, Marco, Coogan, Adam, Hofma, Paul, Otten, Sydney, Weniger, Christoph·2020·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Since upcoming telescopes will observe thousands of strong lensing systems, creating fully automated analysis pipelines for these images becomes increasingly important. In this work, we make a step towards that direction by developing the first end-to-end differentiable strong lensing pipeline. Our approach leverages and combines three important computer science developments: (i) convolutional neural networks (CNNs), (ii) efficient gradient-based sampling techniques, and (iii) deep probabilistic programming languages. The latter automatize parameter inference and enable the combination of generative deep neural networks and physics components in a single model. In the current work, we demonstrate that it is possible to combine a CNN trained on galaxy images as a source model with a fully differentiable and exact implementation of gravitational lensing physics in a single probabilistic model. This does away with hyperparameter tuning for the source model, enables the simultaneous optimization of nearly 100 source and lens parameters with gradient-based methods, and allows the use of efficient gradient-based posterior sampling techniques. These features make this automated inference pipeline potentially suitable for processing a large amount of data. By analysing mock lensing systems with different signal-to-noise ratios, we show that lensing parameters are reconstructed with per cent-level accuracy. More generally, we consider this work as one of the first steps in establishing differentiable probabilistic programming techniques in the particle astrophysics community, which have the potential to significantly accelerate and improve many complex data analysis tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa1477

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chianese et al. (2020) main novelty is that thanks to the differentiable programming framework, it becomes possible to compute the derivatives of the likelihood function with respect to both the parameters of the source and the lens, allowing for fast inference.

    “The main novelty, is that thanks to the differentiable programming framework, it becomes possible to compute the derivatives of the likelihood function with respect to both the parameters of the source and the lens, allowing for fast inference (Figure 26).”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Chianese et al. (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chianese, M., Coogan, A., Hofma, P., Otten, S., & Weniger, C.
Affiliations
  • Delta Institute for Theoretical Physics (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Chianese, Marco
  • Coogan, Adam
  • Hofma, Paul
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-05-28
Volume
496
Issue
1
Pages
381-393
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2979416954
Cited by
36
References
84
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NWO (680-47-532)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Keywords
strong gravitational lensing, convolutional neural networks, automated image analysis, signal-to-noise ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review