Cited by 314Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging

Open access
Vegetti, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., Bolton, A., Treu, T., Gavazzi, R.·2010·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We report the detection of a dark substructure – undetected in the Hubble Space TelescopeHST ACS F814W image – in the gravitational lens galaxy SDSSJ0946+1006 (the ‘double Einstein ring’), through direct gravitational imaging. The detection of a small mass concentration in the surface density maps, at 4.3 kpc from the galaxy centre, has a strong statistical significance. We confirm this detection by modelling the substructure with a tidally truncated pseudo-Jaffe density profile; in that case the substructure mass is Msub= (3.51 ± 0.15) × 109 M⊙, precisely where also the surface density map shows a strong convergence peak (Bayes factor ⁠; equivalent to a ∼16σ detection). The result is robust under substantial changes in the model. We set a lower limit of (M/L)V,⊙≳ 120 M⊙/LV,⊙ (3σ) inside a sphere of 0.3 kpc centred on the substructure (rtidal= 1.1 kpc). The mass and luminosity limit of this substructure are consistent with Local Group results if the substructure had a virial mass of ∼1010 M⊙ before accretion and formed at z≳ 10. Our detection implies a projected dark matter mass fraction in substructure at the radius of the inner Einstein ring of f= 2.15+2.05−1.25 per cent [68 per cent confidence level (CL)] in the mass range 4 × 106– 4 × 109 M⊙, assuming α= 1.9 ± 0.1 (with dN/dm∝m−α). Assuming a flat prior on α, between 1.0 and 3.0, increases this to f= 2.56+3.26−1.50 per cent (68 per cent CL). The likelihood ratio is ∼0.5 between these fractions and that from simulations (fN-body≈ 0.003). Hence the inferred dark matter mass fraction in substructure, admittedly based on a single-lens system, is large but still consistent with predictions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16865.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In strong lensing, a foreground galaxy's gravity distorts and magnifies the light of a background source, creating multiple images or arcs whose detailed structure encodes the mass distribution of the lens.

    “In strong lensing, a foreground galaxy's gravity distorts and magnifies the light of a background source, creating multiple images or arcs whose detailed structure encodes the mass distribution of the lens (Dalal and Kochanek, 2002; Vegetti et al., 2010).”
  • Traditional analyses have identified subhalo signatures via careful lens modeling of individual systems, but such methods are computationally intensive and scale poorly to the large samples of lenses expected from upcoming surveys.

    “Traditional analyses have identified subhalo signatures via careful lens modeling of individual systems (Vegetti et al., 2010), but such methods are computationally intensive and scale poorly to the large samples of lenses expected from upcoming surveys.”
  • Strong gravitational lensing can reveal the influence of dark-matter substructure in galaxies.

    “Strong gravitational lensing can reveal the influence of dark-matter substructure in galaxies”
  • Small-scale perturbations due to dark matter subhalos can produce detectable anomalies in lensed images, offering a promising route to probe the nature of dark matter beyond conventional observations.

    “Notably, small-scale perturbations due to dark matter subhalos can produce detectable anomalies in lensed images (e.g. flux-ratio or astrometric perturbations), offering a promising route to probe the nature of dark matter beyond the reach of conventional observations (Dalal and Kochanek, 2002; Vegetti et al., 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Blandford R., Surpi G., Kundi´ c T., 2001, in T. G. Brainerd & C. S. Kochanek ed., Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Go Vol. 237 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Modeling Galaxy Lenses. pp 65-+
  2. Chopin N., Robert C., 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 801
  3. MacKay D. J. C., 1992, PhD thesis
  4. MacKay D. J. C., 2003, Cambridge University Press
  5. Shaw J. R., Bridges M., Hobson M. P., 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1365 Skilling J., 2004, in Fischer R., Preuss R., Toussaint U. V., eds, AIP Conf. Series Vol. 735 of Am. Inst. of Phys. New York,
  6. Vegetti S., Koopmans L. V. E., 2009b, ArXiv:astro-ph / 0903.4752

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vegetti, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., Bolton, A., Treu, T., & Gavazzi, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Vegetti, S.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2010-10-12
Volume
408
Issue
4
Pages
1969-1981
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166153853
Cited by
314
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
7.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
dark matter substructure, gravitational lensing, tidal truncation, mass-to-light ratio, Local Group, dark matter distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review