Detection of a dark substructure through gravitational imaging
Open accessAbstract
We report the detection of a dark substructure – undetected in the Hubble Space TelescopeHST ACS F814W image – in the gravitational lens galaxy SDSSJ0946+1006 (the ‘double Einstein ring’), through direct gravitational imaging. The detection of a small mass concentration in the surface density maps, at 4.3 kpc from the galaxy centre, has a strong statistical significance. We confirm this detection by modelling the substructure with a tidally truncated pseudo-Jaffe density profile; in that case the substructure mass is Msub= (3.51 ± 0.15) × 109 M⊙, precisely where also the surface density map shows a strong convergence peak (Bayes factor ; equivalent to a ∼16σ detection). The result is robust under substantial changes in the model. We set a lower limit of (M/L)V,⊙≳ 120 M⊙/LV,⊙ (3σ) inside a sphere of 0.3 kpc centred on the substructure (rtidal= 1.1 kpc). The mass and luminosity limit of this substructure are consistent with Local Group results if the substructure had a virial mass of ∼1010 M⊙ before accretion and formed at z≳ 10. Our detection implies a projected dark matter mass fraction in substructure at the radius of the inner Einstein ring of f= 2.15+2.05−1.25 per cent [68 per cent confidence level (CL)] in the mass range 4 × 106– 4 × 109 M⊙, assuming α= 1.9 ± 0.1 (with dN/dm∝m−α). Assuming a flat prior on α, between 1.0 and 3.0, increases this to f= 2.56+3.26−1.50 per cent (68 per cent CL). The likelihood ratio is ∼0.5 between these fractions and that from simulations (fN-body≈ 0.003). Hence the inferred dark matter mass fraction in substructure, admittedly based on a single-lens system, is large but still consistent with predictions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In strong lensing, a foreground galaxy's gravity distorts and magnifies the light of a background source, creating multiple images or arcs whose detailed structure encodes the mass distribution of the lens.
“In strong lensing, a foreground galaxy's gravity distorts and magnifies the light of a background source, creating multiple images or arcs whose detailed structure encodes the mass distribution of the lens (Dalal and Kochanek, 2002; Vegetti et al., 2010).”
From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Vegetti et al., 2010
Traditional analyses have identified subhalo signatures via careful lens modeling of individual systems, but such methods are computationally intensive and scale poorly to the large samples of lenses expected from upcoming surveys.
“Traditional analyses have identified subhalo signatures via careful lens modeling of individual systems (Vegetti et al., 2010), but such methods are computationally intensive and scale poorly to the large samples of lenses expected from upcoming surveys.”
From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Vegetti et al., 2010
Strong gravitational lensing can reveal the influence of dark-matter substructure in galaxies.
“Strong gravitational lensing can reveal the influence of dark-matter substructure in galaxies”
From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Vegetti et al., 2010
Small-scale perturbations due to dark matter subhalos can produce detectable anomalies in lensed images, offering a promising route to probe the nature of dark matter beyond conventional observations.
“Notably, small-scale perturbations due to dark matter subhalos can produce detectable anomalies in lensed images (e.g. flux-ratio or astrometric perturbations), offering a promising route to probe the nature of dark matter beyond the reach of conventional observations (Dalal and Kochanek, 2002; Vegetti et al., 2010).”
From Masked Autoencoder Pretraining on Strong-Lensing Images for Joint Dark-Matter Model Classification and Super-Resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Vegetti et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Blandford R., Surpi G., Kundi´ c T., 2001, in T. G. Brainerd & C. S. Kochanek ed., Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Go Vol. 237 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Modeling Galaxy Lenses. pp 65-+
- Chopin N., Robert C., 2008, ArXiv e-prints, 801
- MacKay D. J. C., 1992, PhD thesis
- MacKay D. J. C., 2003, Cambridge University Press
- Shaw J. R., Bridges M., Hobson M. P., 2007, MNRAS, 378, 1365 Skilling J., 2004, in Fischer R., Preuss R., Toussaint U. V., eds, AIP Conf. Series Vol. 735 of Am. Inst. of Phys. New York,
- Vegetti S., Koopmans L. V. E., 2009b, ArXiv:astro-ph / 0903.4752
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cold dark matter: Controversies on small scales
Weinberg, D. H., Bullock, J. S., Governato, F., Kuzio de Naray, R., & Peter, A. H. G. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308716112 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmological distance
Vegetti, S., Lagattuta, D. J., McKean, J. P., Auger, M. W., Fassnacht, C. D., & Koopmans, L. V. E. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10669 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Self-citationSpace Warps – I. Crowdsourcing the discovery of gravitational lenses
Marshall, P. J., Verma, A., More, A., Davis, C. P., More, S., Kapadia, A., Parrish, M., Snyder, C., Wilcox, J., Baeten, E., et al. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2009 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Sonnenfeld, A., Verma, A., More, A., Baeten, E., Macmillan, C., Wong, K. C., Chan, J. H. H., Jaelani, A. T., Lee, C.-H., Oguri, M., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038067 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Chianese, M., Coogan, A., Hofma, P., Otten, S., & Weniger, C. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1477 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Prasha, A. A., Rachmadi, C. O., Syahlan, M. F. I., Anugerah, N. R., Raditya, N. G., Amelia, P., Mutiara, S. L., & Ramadhan, H. S. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.06642
“…perturbations due to dark matter subhalos can produce detectable anomalies in lensed images (e.g. flux-ratio or astrometric perturbations), o ff ering a promising route to probe the nature of dark matter beyond the reach of conventional observations (Dalal and Kochanek, 2002; Vegetti et al., 2010).”
- Authors
- Vegetti, S., Koopmans, L. V. E., Bolton, A., Treu, T., & Gavazzi, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Vegetti, S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-10-12
- Volume
- 408
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1969-1981
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166153853
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- dark matter substructure, gravitational lensing, tidal truncation, mass-to-light ratio, Local Group, dark matter distribution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review