The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
emerge – empirical constraints on the formation of passive galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We present constraints on the emergence and evolution of passive galaxies with the empirical model emerge, which reproduces the evolution of stellar mass functions (SMFs), specific and cosmic star formation rates since $z$ ≈ 10, ‘quenched’ galaxy fractions, and correlation functions. At fixed halo mass, present-day passive galaxies are more massive than active galaxies, whereas at fixed stellar mass passive galaxies populate more massive haloes in agreement with observations. This effect naturally results from the shape and scatter of the stellar-to-halo mass relation. The stellar mass assembly of present-day passive galaxies is dominated by ‘in situ’ star formation below ∼3 × 1011 M⊙ and by merging and accretion of ‘ex situ’ formed stars at higher mass. The mass dependence is in tension with current cosmological simulations. Lower mass passive galaxies show extended star formation towards low redshift in agreement with IFU surveys. All passive galaxies have main progenitors on the ‘main sequence of star formation’ with the ‘red sequence’ appearing at $z$ ≈ 2. Above this redshift, over 95 per cent of the progenitors of passive galaxies are active. More than 90 per cent of $z$ ≈ 2 ‘main sequence’ galaxies with m* > 1010 M⊙ evolve into present-day passive galaxies. Above redshift 6, more than 80 per cent of the observed SMFs above 109 M⊙ can be accounted for by progenitors of passive galaxies with m* > 1010 M⊙. This implies that high-redshift observations mainly probe the birth of present-day passive galaxies. emerge is available at github.com/bmoster/emerge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 · Cited by 1,243
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 110
- Baugh, 2006, Rep. Prog. Phys., 69, 3101, 10.1088/0034-4885/69/12/R02 · DOI
- Beare, 2019, ApJ, 873, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab041a · DOI
- Behroozi, 2010, ApJ, 717, 379, 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/379 · DOI
- Behroozi, 2013, ApJ, 762, 109, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/109 · DOI
- Behroozi, 2013, ApJ, 763, 18, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/18 · DOI
- Bernardi, 2003, AJ, 125, 1849, 10.1086/374256 · DOI
- Bernardi, 2011, MNRAS, 412, L6, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00982.x · DOI
- Bernardi, 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5633, 10.1093/mnras/stz2413 · DOI
- Bhatawdekar, 2019, MNRAS, 486, 3805, 10.1093/mnras/stz866 · DOI
- Blaizot, 2004, MNRAS, 352, 571, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07947.x · DOI
- Blumenthal, 1984, Nature, 311, 517, 10.1038/311517a0 · DOI
- Boogaard, 2018, A&A, 619, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833136 · DOI
- Boylan-Kolchin, 2008, MNRAS, 383, 93, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12530.x · DOI
- Boylan-Kolchin, 2009, MNRAS, 398, 1150, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15191.x · DOI
- Bryan, 1998, ApJ, 495, 80, 10.1086/305262 · DOI
- Cappellari, 2004, PASP, 116, 138, 10.1086/381875 · DOI
- Cappellari, 2011, MNRAS, 413, 813, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18174.x · DOI
- Cattaneo, 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1651, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10608.x · DOI
- Cattaneo, 2008, MNRAS, 389, 567, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13562.x · DOI
- Cattaneo, 2011, A&A, 533, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015780 · DOI
- Cattaneo, 2013, MNRAS, 430, 686, 10.1093/mnras/sts668 · DOI
- Chabrier, 2003, PASP, 115, 763, 10.1086/376392 · DOI · Paper page
- Choi, 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4105, 10.1093/mnras/stv575 · DOI
- Cole, 1994, MNRAS, 271, 781, 10.1093/mnras/271.4.781 · DOI
- Conroy, 2009, ApJ, 696, 620, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/620 · DOI
- Conroy, 2006, ApJ, 647, 201, 10.1086/503602 · DOI
- Cowie, 1996, AJ, 112, 839, 10.1086/118058 · DOI
- Davé, 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1671, 10.1093/mnras/stx1693 · DOI
- Davidzon, 2018, ApJ, 852, 107, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa19e · DOI
- Dekel, 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x · DOI
- De Lucia, 2006, MNRAS, 366, 499, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09879.x · DOI
- Dolence, 2008, 9th LCI International Conference on High-Performance Clustered Computing
- D’Souza, 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1433, 10.1093/mnras/stu1194 · DOI
- Dubois, 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1453, 10.1093/mnras/stu1227 · DOI
- Duc, 2011, MNRAS, 417, 863, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19137.x · DOI
- Elson, 2007, A&A, 464, 1167, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065081 · DOI
- Faber, 2007, ApJ, 665, 265, 10.1086/519294 · DOI
- Fall, 1980, MNRAS, 193, 189, 10.1093/mnras/193.2.189 · DOI
- Gavazzi, 2002, ApJ, 576, 135, 10.1086/341730 · DOI
- Genzel, 2006, Nature, 442, 786, 10.1038/nature05052 · DOI
- Genzel, 2008, ApJ, 687, 59, 10.1086/591840 · DOI
- Goodman, 2010, Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., 5, 65, 10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 · DOI
- Grylls, 2020, MNRAS, 491, 634, 10.1093/mnras/stz2956 · DOI
- Guo, 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1111, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16341.x · DOI
- Hahn, 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2101, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18820.x · DOI
- Heavens, 2004, Nature, 428, 625, 10.1038/nature02474 · DOI
- Henriques, 2019, MNRAS, 485, 3446, 10.1093/mnras/stz577 · DOI
- Hirschmann, 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2304, 10.1093/mnras/stu1023 · DOI
- Hopkins, 2014, MNRAS, 445, 581, 10.1093/mnras/stu1738 · DOI
- Hubble, 1926, ApJ, 64, 321, 10.1086/143018 · DOI
- Katsianis, 2017, MNRAS, 464, 4977, 10.1093/mnras/stw2680 · DOI
- Kauffmann, 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201, 10.1093/mnras/264.1.201 · DOI
- Knobel, 2015, ApJ, 800, 24, 10.1088/0004-637X/800/1/24 · DOI
- Lacey, 1993, MNRAS, 262, 627, 10.1093/mnras/262.3.627 · DOI
- Lange, 2019, MNRAS, 487, 3112, 10.1093/mnras/stz1466 · DOI
- Lewis, 2000, ApJ, 538, 473, 10.1086/309179 · DOI · Paper page
- Lilly, 1995, ApJ, 455, 108, 10.1086/176560 · DOI
- Liu, 2018, ApJ, 853, 172, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa600 · DOI
- Macciò, 2008, MNRAS, 391, 1940, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14029.x · DOI
- McDermid, 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3484, 10.1093/mnras/stv105 · DOI
- Mandelbaum, 2006, MNRAS, 368, 715, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x · DOI · Paper page
- Mandelbaum, 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3200, 10.1093/mnras/stw188 · DOI
- Mo, 1996, MNRAS, 282, 347, 10.1093/mnras/282.2.347 · DOI
- Moore, 2001, Mining the Sky, 71, 10.1007/10849171_5 · DOI
- More, 2011, MNRAS, 410, 210, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17436.x · DOI
- Moster, 2010, ApJ, 710, 903, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/903 · DOI
- Moster, 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3121, 10.1093/mnras/sts261 · DOI · Paper page
- Moster, 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1822, 10.1093/mnras/sty655 · DOI
- Mutch, 2013, MNRAS, 435, 2445, 10.1093/mnras/stt1453 · DOI
- Naab, 2017, ARA&A, 55, 59, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · DOI
- Oser, 2010, ApJ, 725, 2312, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2312 · DOI
- Peacock, 2000, MNRAS, 318, 1144, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03779.x · DOI
- Pérez-González, 2008, ApJ, 675, 234, 10.1086/523690 · DOI
- Pillepich, 2018, MNRAS, 475, 648, 10.1093/mnras/stx3112 · DOI
- Planck Collaboration VI, 2020, A&A, A6
- Renzini, 2015, ApJ, 801, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29 · DOI
- Ruiz, 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1605, 10.1093/mnras/stv2030 · DOI
- Salmon, 2015, ApJ, 799, 183, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/183 · DOI
- Sheth, 2004, MNRAS, 349, 1464, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07622.x · DOI
- Somerville, 2015, ARA&A, 53, 51, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · DOI
- Somerville, 1999, MNRAS, 310, 1087, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03032.x · DOI
- Springel, 2005, MNRAS, 364, 1105, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · DOI · Paper page
- Springel, 2005, MNRAS, 361, 776, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09238.x · DOI
- Tacchella, 2015, Science, 348, 314, 10.1126/science.1261094 · DOI
- Tacchella, 2019, MNRAS, 487, 5416, 10.1093/mnras/stz1657 · DOI
- Tacconi, 2013, ApJ, 768, 74, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/74 · DOI
- Teyssier, 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3068, 10.1093/mnras/sts563 · DOI
- Thomas, 2005, ApJ, 621, 673, 10.1086/426932 · DOI
- Thomas, 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1775, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16427.x · DOI
- Tinker, 2012, ApJ, 755, L5, 10.1088/2041-8205/755/1/L5 · DOI
- Trujillo, 2006, ApJ, 650, 18, 10.1086/506464 · DOI
- Tweed, 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1427, 10.1093/mnras/sty507 · DOI
- Vale, 2004, MNRAS, 353, 189, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08059.x · DOI
- van der Wel, 2014, ApJ, 788, 28, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28 · DOI
- van Dokkum, 2008, ApJ, 677, L5, 10.1086/587874 · DOI
- Vogelsberger, 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1518, 10.1093/mnras/stu1536 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, MNRAS, 454, 83, 10.1093/mnras/stv1937 · DOI
- Wechsler, 2018, ARA&A, 56, 435, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756 · DOI
- Wechsler, 1998, ApJ, 506, 19, 10.1086/306229 · DOI
- Wechsler, 2002, ApJ, 568, 52, 10.1086/338765 · DOI
- Wetzel, 2013, MNRAS, 432, 336, 10.1093/mnras/stt469 · DOI
- Whitaker, 2014, ApJ, 795, 104, 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/104 · DOI
- Whitaker, 2012, ApJ, 754, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/L29 · DOI
- White, 1991, ApJ, 379, 52, 10.1086/170483 · DOI
- White, 1978, MNRAS, 183, 341, 10.1093/mnras/183.3.341 · DOI · Paper page
- Wojtak, 2013, MNRAS, 428, 2407, 10.1093/mnras/sts203 · DOI
- Wright, 2018, MNRAS, 480, 3491, 10.1093/mnras/sty2136 · DOI
- Yang, 2003, MNRAS, 339, 1057, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06254.x · DOI
- Zehavi, 2004, ApJ, 608, 16, 10.1086/386535 · DOI
- Zehavi, 2018, ApJ, 853, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa54a · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Pfeffer, J. L., Chevance, M., Bonaca, A., Trujillo-Gomez, S., Bastian, N., Reina-Campos, M., Crain, R. A., & Hughes, M. E. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2452 · Cited by 252
“…been identified), implying that the total accreted stellar mass is likely to be close to the sum of the five satellites discussed here (which is on the low side of, but consistent with the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by Behroozi et al. 2019 and Moster et al. 2019, who find 1−5× 109 M ).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Moster, Benjamin P
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-10-05
- Volume
- 499
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4748-4767
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2982082610
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MO 2979/1-1, 390783311)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- quiescent galaxies, galaxy quenching, galaxy evolution, stellar mass function, star formation rate, stellar mass-halo mass relation, galaxy mergers, in situ star formation, galaxy progenitors, star-forming main sequence, red sequence, galaxy halo mass
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review