The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A combined analysis of the H 0 late time direct measurements and the impact on the Dark Energy sector
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT We combine 23 Hubble constant measurements based on Cepheids-SN Ia, TRGB-SN Ia, Miras-SN Ia, Masers, Tully Fisher, Surface Brightness Fluctuations, SN II, Time-delay Lensing, Standard Sirens and γ-ray Attenuation, obtaining our best optimistic H0 estimate, that is H0 = 72.94 ± 0.75 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL. This is in 5.9σ tension with the ΛCDM model, therefore we evaluate its impact on the extended Dark Energy cosmological models that can alleviate the tension. We find more than 4.9σ evidence for a phantom Dark Energy equation of state in the wCDM scenario, the cosmological constant ruled out at more than 3σ in a w0waCDM model and more than 5.7σ evidence for a coupling between Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the IDE scenario. Finally, we check the robustness of our results; and we quote two additional combinations of the Hubble constant. The ultra-conservative estimate, H0 = 72.7 ± 1.1 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL, is obtained removing the Cepheids-SN Ia and the Time-Delay Lensing based measurements, and confirms the evidence for new physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parametersPreprint
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,364
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., Odegard, N., Smith, K. M., Hill, R. S., Gold, B., Halpern, M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 · Cited by 2,639
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 · Cited by 2,201 · cited 2×
“Cepheids-SN Ia: we average the H0 measurements from Riess et al. 2019 [4], H0 = 74.03± 1.42 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Burns et al. 2018 [77], H0 = 73.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Freedman et al. 2012 [78], H0 = 74.3 ± 2.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and we use the smallest error bar of the ar X iv :2 01 1.”
InfluentialTensions between the early and late Universe
Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 · Cited by 1,380 · cited 1×
“…± 2.50 Reid, Pesce, Riess 2019 [82] 71.1 ± 1.9 Huang et al. 2019 [83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55 Schombert et al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88]…”
InfluentialA gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. M. C., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24471 · Cited by 1,201
Planck 2018 results: V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936386 · Cited by 1,197
Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
Chevallier, M., & Polarski, D. (2001) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 1,075
Early Dark Energy can Resolve the Hubble Tension
Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.221301 · Cited by 1,011
Wong, K., Suyu, S., Chen, G., Rusu, C., Millon, M., Sluse, D., Bonvin, V., Fassnacht, C., Taubenberger, S., Auger, M., et al. (2019) · Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3094 · Cited by 966
Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Bowers, J. B., Macri, L., Zinn, J. C., & Scolnic, D. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbaf · Cited by 815
Wang, B., Abdalla, E., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D. (2016) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096901 · Cited by 728
Hubble constant hunter’s guide
Knox, L., & Millea, M. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.043533 · Cited by 638
Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters
Lewis, A. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.103529 · Cited by 618
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 maps and cosmological parameters
Aiola, S., Calabrese, E., Maurin, L., Næss, S., Schmitt, B., Abitbol, M., Addison, G., Ade, P. A. R., Alonso, D., Amiri, M., et al. (2020) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 544
New physics in light of the H 0 tension: An alternative view
Vagnozzi, S. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023518 · Cited by 515
Snowmass2021—Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension
Di Valentino, E., Anchordoqui, L. A., Akarsu, Ö., Ali-Haimoud, Y., Amendola, L., Arendse, N., Asgari, M., Ballardini, M., Basilakos, S., Battistelli, E., et al. (2021) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102605 · Cited by 513
The Expansion of the Universe is Faster than Expected
Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-019-0137-0 · Cited by 461
CARNEGIE HUBBLE PROGRAM: A MID-INFRARED CALIBRATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Scowcroft, V., Burns, C. R., Monson, A. J., Persson, S. E., Seibert, M., & Rigby, J. R. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/758/1/24 · Cited by 460 · cited 5×
“…[74] 68.2 ± 0.7 SPT-SZ+BAO [74] 68.3 ± 0.9 FS+BAO+BBN [75] 68.6 ± 1.1 Breuval et al. 2020 [76] 73.0 ± 2.7 Riess et al.2019 [4] 74.03 ± 1.42 Burns et al. 2018 [77] 73.2 ± 2.3 Freedman et al. 2012 [78] 74.3 ± 2.1 Freedman et al. 2020 [79] 69.6 ± 1.88 Yuan et al. 2019 [80] 72.4 ± 2.0 Jang and Lee…”
InfluentialCosmology intertwined III: f σ 8 and S 8
Valentino, E. D., Anchordoqui, L. A., Akarsu, Ö., Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Amendola, L., Arendse, N., Asgari, M., Ballardini, M., Basilakos, S., Battistelli, E. S., et al. (2021) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604 · Cited by 447
Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch
Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., Hoyt, T. J., Jang, I. S., Beaton, R. L., Lee, M. G., Monson, A., Neeley, J., & Rich, J. A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7339 · Cited by 442
Can interacting dark energy solve the H0 tension?
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Mena, O. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.043503 · Cited by 419
The Megamaser Cosmology Project. XIII. Combined Hubble Constant Constraints
Pesce, D. W., Braatz, J. A., Reid, M. J., Riess, A. G., Scolnic, D., Condon, J. J., Gao, F., Henkel, C., Impellizzeri, C. M. V., Kuo, C. Y., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab75f0 · Cited by 404 · cited 1×
“Masers: we consider Pesce et al. 2020 [84], i.e. H0 = 73.9±3.0 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL for the measurement based on the Masers.”
MethodInfluentialBirrer (2020) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038861 · Cited by 396 · cited 1×
“…al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88] 75.8+5.2−4.9 Wong et al. 2019 [89] 73.3+1.7−1.8 Shajib et al. [90] 74.2+2.7−3.0 Birrer et al. 2020 [91] 67.4+4.2−3.2 At this point we consider a weighted average of the 8…”
InfluentialLarge-scale instability in interacting dark energy and dark matter fluids
Väliviita, J., Majerotto, E., & Maartens, R. (2008) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/07/020 · Cited by 392
Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., Mena, O., & Vagnozzi, S. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063502 · Cited by 389
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., Mena, O., & Vagnozzi, S. (2020) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2020.100666 · Cited by 384
Dark energy at early times, the Hubble parameter, and the string axiverse
Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.103523 · Cited by 379
Tale of stable interacting dark energy, observational signatures, and the H0 tension
Yang, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., Nunes, R. C., Vagnozzi, S., & Mota, D. F. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/019 · Cited by 345
Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: A resolution with novel signatures
Smith, T. L., Poulin, V., & Amin, M. A. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063523 · Cited by 338
An Improved Distance to NGC 4258 and Its Implications for the Hubble Constant
Reid, M. J., Pesce, D. W., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab552d · Cited by 313
Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields
Poulin, V., Smith, T. L., Grin, D., Karwal, T., & Kamionkowski, M. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.083525 · Cited by 294
Early Dark Energy from Massive Neutrinos as a Natural Resolution of the Hubble Tension
Sakstein, J., & Trodden, M. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.161301 · Cited by 276
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: A Precise H0 Estimate from DES Y1, BAO, and D/H Data
Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J. T., Bechtol, K., Blazek, J., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, R. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1939 · Cited by 273
Addison, G. E., Watts, D. J., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., & Weiland, J. L. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa1ed · Cited by 265
Acoustic dark energy: Potential conversion of the Hubble tension
Lin, M., Benevento, G., Hu, W., & Raveri, M. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.063542 · Cited by 257
Niedermann, F., & Sloth, M. S. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.l041303 · Cited by 257
Shajib, A. J., Birrer, S., Treu, T., Agnello, A., Buckley‐Geer, E., Chan, J. H. H., Christensen, L., Lemon, C., Lin, H., Millon, M., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa828 · Cited by 251
Echo of interactions in the dark sector
Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2017) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.103511 · Cited by 229
Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?
Ye, G., & Yun-song Piao, A. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083507 · Cited by 224
A Simple Phenomenological Emergent Dark Energy Model can Resolve the Hubble Tension
Li, X., & Shafieloo, A. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab3e09 · Cited by 223
Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoodsPreprint
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.12875 · Cited by 221
Philcox, O. H. E., Ivanov, M. M., Simonović, M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/032 · Cited by 220
Huang, C. D., Riess, A. G., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., Zakamska, N. L., Casertano, S., Whitelock, P. A., Hoffmann, S. L., Filippenko, A. V., & Scolnic, D. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5dbd · Cited by 219 · cited 2×
“…et al. 2012 [78] 74.3 ± 2.1 Freedman et al. 2020 [79] 69.6 ± 1.88 Yuan et al. 2019 [80] 72.4 ± 2.0 Jang and Lee 2017 [81] 71.17 ± 2.50 Reid, Pesce, Riess 2019 [82] 71.1 ± 1.9 Huang et al. 2019 [83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55…”
MethodInfluentialRock ‘n’ roll solutions to the Hubble tension
Agrawal, P., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., Pinner, D., & Randall, L. (2023) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101347 · Cited by 217
Probing the interaction between dark matter and dark energy in the presence of massive neutrinos
Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.123511 · Cited by 216
KiDS-450: testing extensions to the standard cosmological model
Joudaki, S., Mead, A., Blake, C., Choi, A., de Jong, J., Erben, T., Fenech Conti, I., Herbonnet, R., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx998 · Cited by 200
Gavela, M. B., Hernández, D., Lopez-Honorez, L., Mena, O., & Rigolin, S. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/07/034 · Cited by 200
Goldstone Bosons as Fractional Cosmic Neutrinos
Weinberg, S. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.241301 · Cited by 197
The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances*
Blakeslee, J. P., Jensen, J. B., Ma, C.-P., Milne, P. A., & Greene, J. E. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe86a · Cited by 193
Yuan, W., Riess, A. G., Macri, L. M., Casertano, S., & Scolnic, D. M. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4bc9 · Cited by 192 · cited 7×
“[79] W. L. Freedman, B. F. Madore, T. Hoyt, I. S. Jang, R. Beaton, M. G. Lee, A. Monson, J. Neeley, and J. Rich, (2020), arXiv:2002.01550 [astro-ph.”
InfluentialThe Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant
Burns, C. R., Parent, E., Phillips, M. M., Stritzinger, M. D., Krisciunas, K., Suntzeff, N. B., Hsiao, E. Y., Contreras, C., Anais, J., Boldt, L., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae51c · Cited by 189 · cited 2×
“Cepheids-SN Ia: we average the H0 measurements from Riess et al. 2019 [4], H0 = 74.03± 1.42 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Burns et al. 2018 [77], H0 = 73.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Freedman et al. 2012 [78], H0 = 74.3 ± 2.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and we use the smallest error bar of the ar X iv :2 01 1.”
InfluentialGraduated dark energy: Observational hints of a spontaneous sign switch in the cosmological constant
Akarsu, Ö., Barrow, J. D., Escamilla, L. A., & Vazquez, J. A. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063528 · Cited by 189
Interacting dark energy with time varying equation of state and the H0 tension
Yang, W., Mukherjee, A., Valentino, E. D., & Pan, S. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.123527 · Cited by 188
Can late dark energy transitions raise the Hubble constant?
Benevento, G., Hu, W., & Raveri, M. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.103517 · Cited by 187
H0 tension, phantom dark energy, and cosmological parameter degeneracies
Alestas, G., Kazantzidis, L., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123516 · Cited by 174
Measuring the Hubble constant with Type Ia supernovae as near-infrared standard candles
Dhawan, S., Jha, S. W., & LEIBUNDGUT, B. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731501 · Cited by 171
Interacting models may be key to solve the cosmic coincidence problem
del Campo, S., Herrera, R., & Pavón, D. (2009) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/01/020 · Cited by 169
Dark Energy with Phantom Crossing and the H0 Tension
Valentino, E. D., Mukherjee, A., & Sen, A. A. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23040404 · Cited by 169
A measurement of the Hubble constant from Type II supernovae
de Jaeger, T., Stahl, B. E., Zheng, W., Filippenko, A. V., Riess, A. G., & Galbany, L. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1801 · Cited by 165 · cited 1×
“…[83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55 Schombert et al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88] 75.8+5.2−4.9 Wong et al. 2019 [89] 73.3+1.7−1.8 Shajib et al. [90]…”
InfluentialNew Target for Cosmic Axion Searches
Baumann, D., Green, D., & Wallisch, B. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.171301 · Cited by 160
Observational constraints on one-parameter dynamical dark-energy parametrizations and the H0 tension
Yang, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., Saridakis, E. N., & Chakraborty, S. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043543 · Cited by 155
Update on coupled dark energy and the H 0 tension
Gómez-Valent, A., Pettorino, V., & Amendola, L. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.123513 · Cited by 154
Using the Baryonic Tully–Fisher Relation to Measure Ho
Schombert, J., McGaugh, S., & Lelli, F. (2020) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab9d88 · Cited by 135 · cited 3×
“…measurements from Infrared Tully Fisher, Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85], H0 = 76.0 ± 1.1(stat) ± 2.3(sys) km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and from Baryonic Tully Fisher, Schombert et al. 2020 [86], H0 = 75.1 ± 3 Dataset H0 [km/s/Mpc] Planck [3] 67.27 ± 0.60 Planck+lensing [3] 67.36 ±…”
InfluentialLarger value for H0 by an evolving gravitational constant
Braglia, M., Ballardini, M., Emond, W. T., Finelli, F., Gümrükçüoğlu, A. E., Koyama, K., & Paoletti, D. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023529 · Cited by 133
Cosmological constraints in extended parameter space from the Planck 2018 Legacy release
Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/01/013 · Cited by 131
Soltis, J., Casertano, S., & Riess, A. G. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdbad · Cited by 131
Cosmicflows-4: The Calibration of Optical and Infrared Tully–Fisher Relations
Kourkchi, E., Tully, R. B., Anand, G. S., Courtois, H. M., Dupuy, A., Neill, J. D., Rizzi, L., & Seibert, M. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab901c · Cited by 128 · cited 3×
“Tully Fisher: we average the H0 measurements from Infrared Tully Fisher, Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85], H0 = 76.0 ± 1.1(stat) ± 2.3(sys) km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and from Baryonic Tully Fisher, Schombert et al. 2020 [86], H0 = 75.1 ± 3 Dataset H0 [km/s/Mpc] Planck [3] 67.27 ± 0.60 Planck+lensing [3] 67.36 ±…”
InfluentialShedding light on dark matter-dark energy interactions
Lucca, M., & Hooper, D. C. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.123502 · Cited by 127
Unified framework for early dark energy from α -attractors
Braglia, M., Emond, W. T., Finelli, F., Gümrükçüoğlu, A. E., & Koyama, K. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.083513 · Cited by 127
Coupled dark matter-dark energy in light of near universe observations
Lopez-Honorez, L., Reid, B. A., Mena, O., Verde, L., & Jimenez, R. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/09/029 · Cited by 122
Thermal friction as a solution to the Hubble tension
Berghaus, K. V., & Karwal, T. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083537 · Cited by 121
Constraints on the interacting vacuum–geodesic CDM scenario
Martinelli, M., Hogg, N. B., Peirone, S., Bruni, M., & Wands, D. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1915 · Cited by 118
Testing modified gravity with Planck: The case of coupled dark energy
Pettorino, V. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.063519 · Cited by 109
Cosmological axion and neutrino mass constraints from Planck 2015 temperature and polarization data
Valentino, E. D., Giusarma, E., Lattanzi, M., Mena, O., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2015) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.025 · Cited by 107
How early is early dark energy?
Pettorino, V., Amendola, L., & WETTERICH, C. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.083009 · Cited by 107
Implications of a transition in the dark energy equation of state for the H0 and σ8 tensions
Keeley, R. E., Joudaki, S., Kaplinghat, M., & Kirkby, D. P. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/12/035 · Cited by 103
Evidence for Emergent Dark Energy
Li, X., & Shafieloo, A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb3d0 · Cited by 100
Jang, I. S., & Lee, M. G. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/74 · Cited by 98 · cited 2×
“…from Freedman et al. 2020 [79], H0 = 69.6 ± 0.8(stat) ± 1.7(sys) km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Yuan et al. 2019 [80], H0 = 72.4 ± 2.0 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Jang and Lee 2017 [81], H0 = 71.17 ± 1 We compute the arithmetic average of these three measurements, i.e. (74.03+73.2+74.3) 3 = 73.84…”
InfluentialRock 'n' Roll Solutions to the Hubble TensionPreprint
Agrawal, P., Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., Pinner, D., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.01016 · Cited by 98
Reconciling H0 tension in a six parameter space?
Pan, S., Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Shafieloo, A., & Chakraborty, S. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/06/062 · Cited by 95
Yang, W., Pan, S., Nunes, R. C., & Mota, D. F. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/04/008 · Cited by 95
Dark coupling and gauge invariance
Gavela, M. B., Honorez, L. L., Mena, O., & Rigolin, S. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/11/044 · Cited by 94
Cosmic dissonance: Are new physics or systematics behind a short sound horizon?
Arendse, N., Wojtak, R. J., Agnello, A., Chen, G. C.-F., Fassnacht, C. D., Sluse, D., Hilbert, S., Millon, M., Bonvin, V., Wong, K. C., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936720 · Cited by 93
Cosmological Model Insensitivity of Local H 0 from the Cepheid Distance Ladder
Dhawan, S., Brout, D., Scolnic, D., Goobar, A., Riess, A. G., & Miranda, V. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7fb0 · Cited by 88
Searching for dark matter-dark energy interactions: Going beyond the conformal case
van de Bruck, C., & Mifsud, J. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.023506 · Cited by 83
Dark Coupling and Gauge Invariance
Gavela, M. B., Lopez-Honorez, L., Mena, O., & Rigolin, S. (2010) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 83
Dark sectors with dynamical coupling
Yang, W., Mena, O., Pan, S., & Valentino, E. D. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.083509 · Cited by 82
H0 tension, swampland conjectures, and the epoch of fading dark matter
Agrawal, P., Obied, G., & Vafa, C. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.043523 · Cited by 79
Effects of anisotropic stress in interacting dark matter – dark energy scenarios
Yang, W., Pan, S., Xu, L., & Mota, D. F. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2789 · Cited by 78
All-inclusive interacting dark sector cosmologies
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., Pan, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083509 · Cited by 76
Cosmological limits on neutrino unknowns versus low redshift priors
Valentino, E. D., Giusarma, E., Mena, O., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2016) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.083527 · Cited by 70
Breuval, L., Kervella, P., Anderson, R. I., Riess, A. G., Arenou, F., Trahin, B., Mérand, A., Gallenne, A., Gieren, W., Storm, J., et al. (2020) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038633 · Cited by 70 · cited 3×
“…of the models we are analysing in this paper are then obtained, 2 While we were writing this paper, a new Cepheids-SN Ia based measurement, i.e. Breuval et al. 2020 [76] with H0 = 73.0± 2.7 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and a new Surface Brightness Fluctuations based measurement, i.e. Kethan et al. 2020…”
MethodInfluentialCorrelation between dark matter and dark radiation in string compactifications
Allahverdi, R., Cicoli, M., Dutta, B., & Sinha, K. (2014) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/002 · Cited by 67
Observable Windows for the QCD Axion Through the Number of Relativistic Species
Ferreira, R. Z., & Notari, A. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.191301 · Cited by 67
Additional light sterile neutrinos and cosmology
Jacques, T., Krauss, L. M., & Lunardini, C. (2013) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.083515 · Cited by 65
Price of shifting the Hubble constant
Evslin, J., Sen, A. A., & Ruchika, R. (2018) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.103511 · Cited by 60
Right-handed neutrinos as the dark radiation: Status and forecasts for the LHC
Anchordoqui, L. A., Goldberg, H., & Steigman, G. (2012) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.12.019 · Cited by 58
Observational Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy with Pivoting Redshift
Yang, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., & Saridakis, E. N. (2019) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe5110219 · Cited by 49
A fake interacting dark energy detection?
Valentino, E. D., & Mena, O. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa175 · Cited by 49
Is the H0 tension suggesting a fourth neutrino generation?
Carneiro, S., de Holanda, P. C., Pigozzo, C., & Sobreira, F. (2019) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.023505 · Cited by 48
A Bayesian comparison between $$\Lambda $$CDM and phenomenologically emergent dark energy models
Rezaei, M., Naderi, T., Malekjani, M., & Mehrabi, A. (2020) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7942-6 · Cited by 48
Flavor versus mass eigenstates in neutrino asymmetries: implications for cosmology
Barenboim, G., Kinney, W. H., & Park, W.-I. (2017) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5147-4 · Cited by 45
Neutrino Cosmology after WMAP 7-Year Data and LHC First Z′ Bounds
Anchordoqui, L. A., & Goldberg, H. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.081805 · Cited by 44
H0 tension and the string swampland
Anchordoqui, L. A., Ignatios Antoniadis, A., Lüst, D., Soriano, J. F., & Taylor, T. R. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.083532 · Cited by 44
Messengers from the Early Universe: Cosmic Neutrinos and Other Light RelicsPreprint
Green, D., Amin, M. A., Meyers, J., Wallisch, B., Abazajian, K. N., Abidi, M. M., Adshead, P. J., Ahmed, Z., Ansarinejad, B., Armstrong, R., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.04763 · Cited by 43
Dynamical dark sectors and neutrino masses and abundances
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., & Pan, S. (2020) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023535 · Cited by 42
Possible hints of sterile neutrinos in recent measurements of the Hubble parameter
Gelmini, G. B., Kusenko, A., & Takhistov, V. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/06/002 · Cited by 40
Khetan, N., Izzo, L., Branchesi, M., Wojtak, R., Cantiello, M., Murugeshan, C., Agnello, A., Cappellaro, E., Valle, M. D., Gall, C., et al. (2021) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039196/pdf · Cited by 27
Cosmic dissonance: are new physics or systematics behind a short sound horizon?
Arendse, N., Wojtak, R., Agnello, A., Chen, G. C.-F., Fassnacht, C. D., Sluse, D., Hilbert, S., Millon, M., Bonvin, V., Wong, K. C., et al. (2020) · Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936720/pdf · Cited by 26
Update constraints on neutrino mass and mass hierarchy in light of dark energy models
Liu, Z., & Miao, H. (2020) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271820500881 · Cited by 23
The role of CMB spectral distortions in the Hubble tension: A proof of principle
Lucca, M. (2020) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135791 · Cited by 22
Paul, A., Ghoshal, A., Chatterjee, A. R., & Pal, S. (2019) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7348-5 · Cited by 19
Dullo, B. T., Chamorro-Cazorla, M., de Paz, A. G., Castillo-Morales, Á., Gallego, J., Carrasco, E., Iglésias-Páramo, J., Cedazo, R., García-Vargas, M. L., Pascual, S., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf424 · Cited by 18
Effects of neutrino mass and asymmetry on cosmological structure formation
Zeng, Z., Yeung, S., & Chu, M.-C. (2019) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/03/015 · Cited by 16
Dark energy, Ricci-nonflat spaces, and the swampland
Anchordoqui, L. A., Ignatios Antoniadis, A., Lüst, D., & Soriano, J. F. (2021) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136199 · Cited by 14
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aiola, 2020, JCAP, 33
- Freedman, 2020, ApJ, 33
- Green, 2019, BAAS, 51, 159
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Challenges for Λ CDM: An update
Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. (2022) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 · Cited by 1,130
Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension
Vagnozzi, S. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9090393 · Cited by 345
Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics
Hu, J.-P., & Wang, F. Y. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9020094 · Cited by 252
The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances*
Blakeslee, J. P., Jensen, J. B., Ma, C.-P., Milne, P. A., & Greene, J. E. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe86a · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Valentino, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-01-22
- Volume
- 502
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2065-2073
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3097756562
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- Hubble constant, Hubble tension, dark energy, masers, Tully-Fisher relation, surface brightness fluctuations, Type II supernovae, standard sirens, gamma-ray attenuation, phantom dark energy, wCDM model, w0waCDM, interacting dark energy, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
