The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A combined analysis of the H 0 late time direct measurements and the impact on the Dark Energy sector
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT We combine 23 Hubble constant measurements based on Cepheids-SN Ia, TRGB-SN Ia, Miras-SN Ia, Masers, Tully Fisher, Surface Brightness Fluctuations, SN II, Time-delay Lensing, Standard Sirens and γ-ray Attenuation, obtaining our best optimistic H0 estimate, that is H0 = 72.94 ± 0.75 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL. This is in 5.9σ tension with the ΛCDM model, therefore we evaluate its impact on the extended Dark Energy cosmological models that can alleviate the tension. We find more than 4.9σ evidence for a phantom Dark Energy equation of state in the wCDM scenario, the cosmological constant ruled out at more than 3σ in a w0waCDM model and more than 5.7σ evidence for a coupling between Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the IDE scenario. Finally, we check the robustness of our results; and we quote two additional combinations of the Hubble constant. The ultra-conservative estimate, H0 = 72.7 ± 1.1 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL, is obtained removing the Cepheids-SN Ia and the Time-Delay Lensing based measurements, and confirms the evidence for new physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parametersPreprint
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,364
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., Odegard, N., Smith, K. M., Hill, R. S., Gold, B., Halpern, M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 · Cited by 2,639
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 · Cited by 2,201 · cited 2×
“Cepheids-SN Ia: we average the H0 measurements from Riess et al. 2019 [4], H0 = 74.03± 1.42 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Burns et al. 2018 [77], H0 = 73.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Freedman et al. 2012 [78], H0 = 74.3 ± 2.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and we use the smallest error bar of the ar X iv :2 01 1.”
InfluentialTensions between the early and late Universe
Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 · Cited by 1,380 · cited 1×
“…± 2.50 Reid, Pesce, Riess 2019 [82] 71.1 ± 1.9 Huang et al. 2019 [83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55 Schombert et al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88]…”
InfluentialA gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. M. C., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24471 · Cited by 1,201
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aiola, 2020, JCAP, 33
- Freedman, 2020, ApJ, 33
- Green, 2019, BAAS, 51, 159
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Challenges for Λ CDM: An update
Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. (2022) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 · Cited by 1,130
Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension
Vagnozzi, S. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9090393 · Cited by 345
Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics
Hu, J.-P., & Wang, F. Y. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9020094 · Cited by 252
The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances*
Blakeslee, J. P., Jensen, J. B., Ma, C.-P., Milne, P. A., & Greene, J. E. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe86a · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Valentino, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-01-22
- Volume
- 502
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2065-2073
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3097756562
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- Hubble constant, Hubble tension, dark energy, masers, Tully-Fisher relation, surface brightness fluctuations, Type II supernovae, standard sirens, gamma-ray attenuation, phantom dark energy, wCDM model, w0waCDM, interacting dark energy, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
