The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A combined analysis of the H 0 late time direct measurements and the impact on the Dark Energy sector
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT We combine 23 Hubble constant measurements based on Cepheids-SN Ia, TRGB-SN Ia, Miras-SN Ia, Masers, Tully Fisher, Surface Brightness Fluctuations, SN II, Time-delay Lensing, Standard Sirens and γ-ray Attenuation, obtaining our best optimistic H0 estimate, that is H0 = 72.94 ± 0.75 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL. This is in 5.9σ tension with the ΛCDM model, therefore we evaluate its impact on the extended Dark Energy cosmological models that can alleviate the tension. We find more than 4.9σ evidence for a phantom Dark Energy equation of state in the wCDM scenario, the cosmological constant ruled out at more than 3σ in a w0waCDM model and more than 5.7σ evidence for a coupling between Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the IDE scenario. Finally, we check the robustness of our results; and we quote two additional combinations of the Hubble constant. The ultra-conservative estimate, H0 = 72.7 ± 1.1 km s–1 Mpc–1 at 68 per cent CL, is obtained removing the Cepheids-SN Ia and the Time-Delay Lensing based measurements, and confirms the evidence for new physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences
Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177011136 · Cited by 16,627
Planck 2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2020) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 · Cited by 14,258
Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach
Lewis, A., & Bridle, S. (2002) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.103511 · Cited by 3,495
Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parametersPreprint
Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.06209 · Cited by 3,364
NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS
Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L., Jarosik, N., Hinshaw, G., Odegard, N., Smith, K. M., Hill, R. S., Gold, B., Halpern, M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/20 · Cited by 2,639
Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
Linder, E. V. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.091301 · Cited by 2,526
ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER
CHEVALLIER, M., & POLARSKI, D. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271801000822 · Cited by 2,490
Riess, A. G., Casertano, S., Yuan, W., Macri, L. M., & Scolnic, D. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1422 · Cited by 2,201 · cited 2×
“Cepheids-SN Ia: we average the H0 measurements from Riess et al. 2019 [4], H0 = 74.03± 1.42 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Burns et al. 2018 [77], H0 = 73.2 ± 2.3 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, Freedman et al. 2012 [78], H0 = 74.3 ± 2.1 km/s/Mpc at 68% CL, and we use the smallest error bar of the ar X iv :2 01 1.”
InfluentialTensions between the early and late Universe
Verde, L., Treu, T., & Riess, A. G. (2019) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 · Cited by 1,380 · cited 1×
“…± 2.50 Reid, Pesce, Riess 2019 [82] 71.1 ± 1.9 Huang et al. 2019 [83] 73.3 ± 4.0 Pesce et al. 2019 [84] 73.9 ± 3.0 Kourkchi et al. 2020 [85] 76.00 ± 2.55 Schombert et al. 2020 [86] 75.1 ± 2.75 Verde et al. 2019 [5] 75.4 ± 4.0 Khetan et al. 2020 [87] 70.5 ± 4.1 de Jaeger et al. 2020 [88]…”
InfluentialA gravitational-wave standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. M. C., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., Adya, V. B., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24471 · Cited by 1,201
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Aiola, 2020, JCAP, 33
- Freedman, 2020, ApJ, 33
- Green, 2019, BAAS, 51, 159
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions *
Di Valentino, E., Mena, O., Pan, S., Visinelli, L., Yang, W., Melchiorri, A., Mota, D. F., Riess, A. G., & Silk, J. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d · Cited by 2,065
Challenges for Λ CDM: An update
Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. (2022) · New Astronomy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659 · Cited by 1,130
Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension
Vagnozzi, S. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9090393 · Cited by 345
Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics
Hu, J.-P., & Wang, F. Y. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9020094 · Cited by 252
The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances*
Blakeslee, J. P., Jensen, J. B., Ma, C.-P., Milne, P. A., & Greene, J. E. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe86a · Cited by 193
Does Hubble tension signal a breakdown in FLRW cosmology?
Krishnan, C., Mohayaee, R., Colgáin, E. Ó., Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M., & Yin, L. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1a81 · Cited by 179
Robust preference for Dynamical Dark Energy in DESI BAO and SN measurements
Giarè, W., Najafi, M., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., & Firouzjaee, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/035 · Cited by 224
Banik, I., & Zhao, H. (2022) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym14071331 · Cited by 159
New tests of dark sector interactions from the full-shape galaxy power spectrum
Nunes, R. C., Vagnozzi, S., Kumar, S., Valentino, E. D., & Mena, O. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.123506 · Cited by 1
Challenges of the Standard Cosmological Model
Di Valentino, E. (2022) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe8080399 · Cited by 125
Gebhardt, K., Cooper, E. M., Ciardullo, R., Acquaviva, V., Bender, R., Bowman, W. P., Castanheira, B. G., Dalton, G., Davis, D., de Jong, R. S., et al. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2e03 · Cited by 115
Relieving the H 0 tension with a new interacting dark energy model
Gao, L.-Y., Zhao, Z.-W., Xue, S.-S., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/005 · Cited by 93
Exploring the H 0 tension and the evidence for dark sector interactions from 2D BAO measurements
Bernui, A., Valentino, E. D., Giarè, W., Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.103531 · Cited by 92
Akarsu, Ö., Kumar, S., Özülker, E., Vazquez, J. A., & Yadav, A. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.023513 · Cited by 90
Finite-time cosmological singularities and the possible fate of the Universe
de Haro, J., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., Oikonomou, V. K., & Pan, S. (2023) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.09.003 · Cited by 104
Fast galaxy bars continue to challenge standard cosmology
Roshan, M., Ghafourian, N., Kashfi, T., Banik, I., Haslbauer, M., Cuomo, V., Famaey, B., & Kroupa, P. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2553 · Cited by 88
“…simulations with regards to bar pattern speeds is in line with several previously documented significant failures of ΛCDM in other respects (e.g. Kroupa 2012, 2015; Pawlowski 2018), including also on cosmological scales (e.g. Haslbauer et al. 2020; Di Valentino 2021; Asencio et al. 2021).”
ResultNew constraints on interacting dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO observations
Silva, E., Sabogal, M. A., Scherer, M., Nunes, R. C., Valentino, E. D., & Kumar, S. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/qqc6-76z4 · Cited by 88
Wang, B., Elcio Abdalla, A., Atrio-Barandela, F., & Pavón, D. (2024) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad2527 · Cited by 81
Late-transition versus smooth H(z) -deformation models for the resolution of the Hubble crisis
Alestas, G., Camarena, D., Valentino, E. D., Kazantzidis, L., Marra, V., Nesseris, S., & Perivolaropoulos, L. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.063538 · Cited by 78
Anchordoqui, L. A., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., & Yang, W. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2021.08.001 · Cited by 76
Symmetry of Cosmological Observables, a Mirror World Dark Sector, and the Hubble Constant
Cyr-Racine, F.-Y., Ge, F., & Knox, L. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.201301 · Cited by 75
Dark sector interaction and the supernova absolute magnitude tension
Nunes, R. C., & Valentino, E. D. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063529 · Cited by 73
The state of the dark energy equation of state circa 2023
Escamilla, L. A., Giarè, W., Valentino, E. D., Nunes, R. C., & Vagnozzi, S. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/091 · Cited by 74
“[232] and tables II–VI in ref.”
A consistent view of interacting dark energy from multiple CMB probes
Zhai, Y., Giarè, W., van de Bruck, C., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., & Nunes, R. C. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/032 · Cited by 70
Sabogal, M. A., Silva, E., Nunes, R. C., Kumar, S., Valentino, E. D., & Giarè, W. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123508 · Cited by 62
Generalized emergent dark energy model and the Hubble constant tension
Yang, W., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Shafieloo, A., & Li, X. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063521 · Cited by 61
A double take on early and interacting dark energy from JWST
Forconi, M., Giarè, W., Mena, O., Ruchika, R., Valentino, E. D., MELCHIORRI, A., & Nunes, R. C. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/097 · Cited by 60
Late-time interacting cosmologies and the Hubble constant tension
Gariazzo, S., Valentino, E. D., Mena, O., & Nunes, R. C. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.023530 · Cited by 61
Strong constraints on the gravitational law from Gaia DR3 wide binaries
Banik, I., Pittordis, C., Sutherland, W. J., Famaey, B., Ibata, R., Mieske, S., & Zhao, H. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3393 · Cited by 57
Bonilla, A., Kumar, S., & Nunes, R. C. (n.d.) · Biblioteca Digital da Memória Científica do INPE (National Institute for Space Research) · Cited by 53
Constraints on interacting dark energy models from time-delay cosmography with seven lensed quasars
Wang, L.-F., Zhang, J.-H., He, D.-Z., Zhang, J., & Zhang, X. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1468 · Cited by 52
Uncertain times: the redshift–time relation from cosmology and stars
Boylan-Kolchin, M., & Weisz, D. R. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1521 · Cited by 48
“…10% systematic uncertainty in 𝑡0 and in the age-redshift relation overall.1 Although Cepheid-based determinations are perhaps the most well-known way to measure 𝐻0 in the local Universe, several different techniques are now being employed (for a recent compilation, see Di Valentino 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialValentino, E. D., Giarè, W., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103506 · Cited by 46
Neural network reconstruction of late-time cosmology and null tests
Dialektopoulos, K. F., Said, J. L., Mifsud, J., Sultana, J., & Adami, K. Z. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/023 · Cited by 47
Yadav, A. K., Bhoyar, S. R., Dhabe, M. C., Shekh, S. H., & Ahmad, N. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.06.012 · Cited by 47
Giarè, W., Zhai, Y., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., Nunes, R. C., & van de Bruck, C. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.063527 · Cited by 47
Inflation, the Hubble tension, and early dark energy: An alternative overview
Giarè, W. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.123545 · Cited by 59
Observational constraints on Myrzakulov gravity
Anagnostopoulos, F. K., Basilakos, S., & Saridakis, E. N. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104013 · Cited by 46
Demiański, M., Piedipalumbo, E., Sawant, D., & Amati, L. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1669 · Cited by 43
“…parameterizations Ωe have been estimated from several observations, as nucleosynthesis, structure formation, or the peak separation in the power spectrum of the cosmic microwave radiation anisotropy(Das et al. 2011; Doran, Lilley, & Wetterich 2002; Doran & Robbers 2006; Di Valentino 2021).”
MethodSabogal, M. A., Silva, E., Nunes, R. C., Kumar, S., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.043531 · Cited by 42
On the dynamics of a dark sector coupling
Yang, W., Pan, S., Mena, O., & Valentino, E. D. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2023.09.001 · Cited by 40
3D hydrodynamic simulations for the formation of the Local Group satellite planes
Banik, I., Thies, I., Truelove, R., Candlish, G., Famaey, B., Pawlowski, M. S., Ibata, R., & Kroupa, P. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac722 · Cited by 38
Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
A simultaneous solution to the Hubble tension and observed bulk flow within 250 h−1 Mpc
Mazurenko, S., Banik, I., Kroupa, P., & Haslbauer, M. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3357 · Cited by 36
Valentino, E. D., Giarè, W., MELCHIORRI, A., & Silk, J. I. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad152 · Cited by 34
Touch of neutrinos on the vacuum metamorphosis: Is the H0 solution back?
Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Yang, W., & Anchordoqui, L. A. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.123527 · Cited by 35
New LZ and PW(Z) relations of RR Lyrae stars calibrated withGaiaEDR3 parallaxes
Garofalo, A., Delgado, H. E., Sarro, L. M., Clementini, G., Muraveva, T., Marconi, M., & Ripepi, V. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac735 · Cited by 33
Barred spiral galaxies in modified gravity theories
Roshan, M., Banik, I., Ghafourian, N., Thies, I., Famaey, B., Asencio, E., & Kroupa, P. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab651 · Cited by 31
“G A ] 3 M of the cosmic microwave background (CMB, Di Valentino et al. 2019) or the present expansion rate of the Universe (e.g. Di Valentino 2021, and references therein).”
BackgroundImplications of an Extended Dark Energy Model with Massive Neutrinos
Sharma, R. K., Pandey, K. L., & Das, S. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7a33 · Cited by 31
Exploring the Hubble tension with a late time Modified Gravity scenario
Escamilla, L. A., Fiorucci, D., Montani, G., & Valentino, E. D. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101652 · Cited by 41
Sources of H0 -tension in dark energy scenarios
Haridasu, B. S., Viel, M., & Vittorio, N. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.063539 · Cited by 31
Dipole cosmology: the Copernican paradigm beyond FLRW
Krishnan, C., Mondol, R., & Sheikh-Jabbari, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/07/020 · Cited by 30
“This discrepancy is often quoted to be at the 4-6 σ [8, 10] level.”
BackgroundA new binning method to choose a standard set of Quasars
Dainotti, M. G., Lenart, A. Ł., Yengejeh, M. G., Chakraborty, S., Fraija, N. I., Valentino, E. D., & Montani, G. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101428 · Cited by 29
Questioning the H 0 tension via the look-back time
Capozzıello, S., Sarracino, G., & Spallicci, A. D. A. M. (2023) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2023.101201 · Cited by 27
Thermal friction as a solution to the Hubble and large-scale structure tensions
Berghaus, K. V., & Karwal, T. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.103515 · Cited by 27
“This mismatch is in fact echoed at a lower discrepancy level by several measurements [5, 6], with the early universe and a ΛCDM model consistently finding a lower H0 [3, 7] than the late universe [8–14].”
BackgroundResultA New Master Supernovae Ia sample and the investigation of the Hubble tension
Dainotti, M. G., Simone, B. D., Garg, A., Kohri, K., Bashyal, A., Aich, A., Mondal, A., Nagataki, S., Montani, G., Jareen, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100405 · Cited by 37
Toward a concordance teleparallel cosmology. Part II. Linear perturbation
Hashim, M., El-Zant, A. A., Hanafy, W. E., & Golovnev, A. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/07/053 · Cited by 25
Gravitational transitions via the explicitly broken symmetron screening mechanism
Perivolaropoulos, L., & Skara, F. (2022) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.043528 · Cited by 26
Zhao, C., Yu, Y., Han, J., & Jing, Y. (2025) · Science China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2671-0 · Cited by 25
Do the early galaxies observed by JWST disagree with Planck's CMB polarization measurements?
Forconi, M., Ruchika, R., MELCHIORRI, A., Mena, O., & Menci, N. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/012 · Cited by 25
Quintessential cosmological tensions
Adil, A., Albrecht, A., & Knox, L. (2023) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.063521 · Cited by 22
The redshift dependence of the inferred H0 in a local void solution to the Hubble tension
Mazurenko, S., Banik, I., & Kroupa, P. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2758 · Cited by 21
Non-linear matter power spectrum modeling in interacting dark energy cosmologies
Silva, E., Zúñiga-Bolaño, U., Nunes, R. C., & Valentino, E. D. (2024) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13487-x · Cited by 22
III. Interacting Dark Energy: Summary of models, Pathologies, and Constraints
van der Westhuizen, M. A., Abebe, A., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102121 · Cited by 20
A low-redshift preference for an interacting dark energy model
Zhai, Y., de Cesare, M., van de Bruck, C., Valentino, E. D., & Wilson-Ewing, E. (2025) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/010 · Cited by 22
Enhancing cosmic shear with the multiscale lensing probability density function
Giblin, B., Cai, Y.-C., & Harnois-Déraps, J. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad230 · Cited by 20
Hydrodynamical structure formation in Milgromian cosmology
Wittenburg, N., Kroupa, P., Banik, I., Candlish, G., & Samaras, N. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1371 · Cited by 20
A Critical Discussion on the H0 Tension
Capozzıello, S., Sarracino, G., & Somma, G. D. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10030140 · Cited by 20
Testing the local void hypothesis using baryon acoustic oscillation measurements over the last 20 yr
Banik, I., & Kalaitzidis, V. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf781 · Cited by 20
Combining cosmological and local bounds on bimetric theory
Caravano, A., Lüben, M., & Weller, J. (2021) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/035 · Cited by 23
“4km/s/Mpc, which is in perfect agreement with local determinations of H0 [145].”
Giarè, W., Gómez-Valent, A., Valentino, E. D., & van de Bruck, C. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.063516 · Cited by 17
Improved late-time fits with wavelet extensions of ΛCDM
Escamilla, L. A., Özülker, E., Akarsu, Ö., Valentino, E. D., & Vazquez, J. A. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1732 · Cited by 31
Constraining modified gravity with weak-lensing peaks
Davies, C. T., Harnois-Déraps, J., Li, B., Giblin, B., Hernández‐Aguayo, C., & Paillas, E. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1966 · Cited by 16
Banik, I., Nagesh, S. T., Haghi, H., Kroupa, P., & Zhao, H. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1073 · Cited by 16
Exploring the growth index γL : Insights from different CMB dataset combinations and approaches
Specogna, E., Valentino, E. D., Said, J. L., & Nguyen, N.-M. (2024) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.043528 · Cited by 23
Liu, W., Anchordoqui, L. A., Valentino, E. D., Pan, S., Wu, Y., & Yang, W. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/012 · Cited by 14
Thomson scattering: one rate to rule them all
Greene, K., & Cyr-Racine, F.-Y. (2023) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/10/065 · Cited by 23
Decay of f ( R ) quintessence into dark matter: Mitigating the Hubble tension?
Montani, G., Escamilla, L. A., Carlevaro, N., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/mn69-1dn6 · Cited by 13
Late-time background constraints on linear and non-linear interacting dark energy after DESI DR2
Figueruelo, D., van der Westhuizen, M. A., Abebe, A., & Valentino, E. D. (2026) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102238 · Cited by 25
Lifshitz cosmology: quantum vacuum and Hubble tension
Berechya, D., & Leonhardt, U. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2345 · Cited by 12
Redshift-space distortions corner interacting dark energy
Ghedini, P., Hajjar, R., & Mena, O. (2024) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101671 · Cited by 12
Hubble distancing: focusing on distance measurements in cosmology
Greene, K., & Cyr-Racine, F.-Y. (2022) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/06/002 · Cited by 12
“[87, 101, 103, 106, 107, 114, 217–220]), all of the richness and complexity of the distance ladder measurements described in the previous section are reduced to a simple Gaussian constraint on H 0 (see Refs.”
DE Models with Combined H0 · rd from BAO and CMB Dataset and Friends
Staicova, D. (2022) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe8120631 · Cited by 12
On the absence of backsplash analogues to NGC 3109 in the ΛCDM framework
Banik, I., Haslbauer, M., Pawlowski, M. S., Famaey, B., & Kroupa, P. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab751 · Cited by 10
“…also be combined with the severe tensions that ΛCDM faces on cosmological scales with regards to the locally measured expansion rate (Riess 2020; Di Valentino 2021), the unusually low matter density within 300 Mpc (Keenan et al. 2013; Haslbauer et al. 2020), and the too-rapid formation of…”
BackgroundPost-reionization H i 21-cm signal: a probe of negative cosmological constant
Dash, C. B. V., Sarkar, T. G., & Sen, A. A. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3946 · Cited by 11
Sanchez, N. G. (2021) · Physical review. D/Physical review. D. · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.123517 · Cited by 11
Probing Departures from ΛCDM by Late-time Datasets
Chaudhary, H., Sharma, V. K., Capozzıello, S., & Mustafa, G. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae4b3f · Cited by 10
“This includes models involving expansions, parameterizations, or principal component analyses of the equation of state ( EoS ) w ≡ p / ρ of a dark-energy fluid with the pressure p and energy density ρ ( E. V. Linder 1988; M. Chevallier & D. Polarski 2001; E. V. Linder 2003; C.-G. Park et al. 2025 ) .”
InfluentialΛsCDM cosmology from a type-II minimally modified gravity
Akarsu, Ö., Felice, A. D., Valentino, E. D., Kumar, S., Nunes, R. C., Özülker, E., Vazquez, J. A., & Yadav, A. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2276 · Cited by 20
II. Non-linear interacting dark energy: Analytical solutions and theoretical pathologies
van der Westhuizen, M. A., Abebe, A., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102120 · Cited by 10
I. Linear interacting dark energy: Analytical solutions and theoretical pathologies
van der Westhuizen, M. A., Abebe, A., & Valentino, E. D. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.102119 · Cited by 16
Exploring bulk viscous unified scenarios with gravitational waves standard sirens
Yang, W., Pan, S., Valentino, E. D., Escamilla‐Rivera, C., & Paliathanasis, A. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad115 · Cited by 10
Effects of a Late Gravitational Transition on Gravitational Waves and Anticipated Constraints
Perivolaropoulos, L., & Paraskevas, E. A. (2023) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe9070317 · Cited by 10
Search for Unstable Sterile Neutrinos with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory
Abbasi, R., Ackermann, M., Adams, J., Aguilar, J. A., Ahlers, M., Ahrens, M., Alameddine, J.-M., Junior, A. A. A., Amin, N. M., Andeen, K., et al. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.151801 · Cited by 12
An independent estimate of H(z) at z = 0.5 from the stellar ages of brightest cluster galaxies
Loubser, S. I., Alabi, A., Hilton, M., Ma, Y.-Z., Tang, X., Hatamkhani, N., Cress, C. M., Skelton, R. E., & Nkosi, S. A. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf915 · Cited by 9
Dark Energy in the DESI Era: A Brief Review of Evidence, Beyond-ΛCDM Interpretations, and Tensions
Li, T.-N., Du, G., Wang, H., Li, Y.-H., Zhang, J.-F., & Zhang, X. (2026) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/ae8429 · Cited by 9
Potentialities of Hubble parameter and expansion rate function data to alleviate Hubble tension
Yang, Y., Lu, X., Qian, L., & Cao, S. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3617 · Cited by 9
MOND-like behavior in the Dirac–Milne universe
Chardin, G., Dubois, Y., Manfredi, G., Miller, B. N., & Stahl, C. (2021) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140575 · Cited by 9
“…the deviations from local to largescale measurements of the Hubble parameter H0, a question of paramount interest in the present context, where the tensions on this parameter seem to reach or even exceed the 5σ level between “local” and cosmological measurements (Riess 2020; Di Valentino 2021).”
BackgroundRevisiting CPL with sign-switching density: To cross or not to cross the NECB
Gökçen, M., Akarsu, Ö., & Valentino, E. D. (2026) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102273 · Cited by 23
Leonhardt, U. (2022) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x22410068 · Cited by 9
“(22) holds exactly, which is almost exactly true, but not quite [20].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAspects of Everpresent Λ. Part II. Cosmological tests of current models
Das, S., Nasiri, A., & Yazdi, Y. K. (2024) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/076 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Valentino, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-01-22
- Volume
- 502
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2065-2073
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3097756562
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 27
- FWCI
- 14.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Keywords
- Hubble constant, Hubble tension, dark energy, masers, Tully-Fisher relation, surface brightness fluctuations, Type II supernovae, standard sirens, gamma-ray attenuation, phantom dark energy, wCDM model, w0waCDM, interacting dark energy, cosmological constant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
