The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter – I. Constant-density cores and substructure
Open accessAbstract
We use cosmological simulations to study the effects of self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) on the density profiles and substructure counts of dark-matter haloes from the scales of spiral galaxies to galaxy clusters, focusing explicitly on models with cross-sections over dark-matter particle mass σ/m = 1 and 0.1 cm2 g−1. Our simulations rely on a new SIDM N-body algorithm that is derived self-consistently from the Boltzmann equation and that reproduces analytic expectations in controlled numerical experiments. We find that well-resolved SIDM haloes have constant-density cores, with significantly lower central densities than their cold dark matter (CDM) counterparts. In contrast, the subhalo content of SIDM haloes is only modestly reduced compared to CDM, with the suppression greatest for large hosts and small halo-centric distances. Moreover, the large-scale clustering and halo circular velocity functions in SIDM are effectively identical to CDM, meaning that all of the large-scale successes of CDM are equally well matched by SIDM. From our largest cross-section runs, we are able to extract scaling relations for core sizes and central densities over a range of halo sizes and find a strong correlation between the core radius of an SIDM halo and the NFW scale radius of its CDM counterpart. We construct a simple analytic model, based on CDM scaling relations, that captures all aspects of the scaling relations for SIDM haloes. Our results show that halo core densities in σ/m = 1 cm2 g−1 models are too low to match observations of galaxy clusters, low surface brightness spirals (LSBs) and dwarf spheroidal galaxies. However, SIDM with σ/m ≃ 0.1 cm2 g−1 appears capable of reproducing reported core sizes and central densities of dwarfs, LSBs and galaxy clusters without the need for velocity dependence. Higher resolution simulations over a wider range of masses will be required to confirm this expectation. We discuss constraints arising from the Bullet cluster observations, measurements of dark-matter density on small scales and subhalo survival requirements, and show that SIDM models with σ/m ≃ 0.1 cm2 g−1 ≃ 0.2 barn GeV−1 are consistent with all observational constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Detailed Mass Map of CL 0024+1654 from Strong Lensing
Tyson, J. A., Kochanski, G. P., & Dell'Antonio, I. P. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311314 · Cited by 335
Cited by
LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products
Ivezić, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., Acosta, E., Allsman, R., Alonso, D., AlSayyad, Y., Anderson, S. F., Andrew, J., et al. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c · Cited by 4,357
Self-citationDark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Wetzel, A. R., Hopkins, P. F., Kim, J.-H., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., Kereš, D., & Quataert, E. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8205/827/2/l23 · Cited by 623
Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Self-citationKaplinghat, M., Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.041302 · Cited by 560
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rocha, M., Peter, A. H. G., Bullock, J. S., Kaplinghat, M., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Oñorbe, J., & Moustakas, L. A.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-01-18
- Volume
- 430
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-104
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2068725239
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 39.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter – I. Constant-density cores and substructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/sts514
- The paper
- Rocha, M., Peter, A. H. G., Bullock, J. S., Kaplinghat, M., Garrison-Kimmel, S., Oñorbe, J., & Moustakas, L. A. (2013). Cosmological simulations with self-interacting dark matter – I. Constant-density cores and substructure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sts514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.