The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Star formation in galaxy mergers with realistic models of stellar feedback and the interstellar medium
Open accessAbstract
We use hydrodynamic simulations with detailed, explicit models for stellar feedback to study galaxy mergers. These high-resolution (∼1 pc) simulations follow the formation and destruction of individual giant molecular clouds (GMC) and star clusters. We find that the final starburst is dominated by in situ star formation, fuelled by gas which flows inwards due to global torques. The resulting high gas density results in rapid star formation. The gas is self-gravitating, and forms massive (≲1010 M⊙) GMC and subsequently super star clusters (with masses up to 108 M⊙). However, in contrast to some recent simulations, the bulk of new stars which eventually form the central bulge are not born in super-clusters which then sink to the centre of the galaxy. This is because feedback efficiently disperses GMC after they turn several per cent of their mass into stars. In other words, most of the mass that reaches the nucleus does so in the form of gas. The Kennicutt–Schmidt law emerges naturally as a consequence of feedback balancing gravitational collapse, independent of the small-scale star formation microphysics. The same mechanisms that drive this relation in isolated galaxies, in particular radiation pressure from infrared photons, extend, with no fine-tuning, over seven decades in star formation rate (SFR) to regulate star formation in the most extreme starburst systems with densities ≳104 M⊙ pc−2. This feedback also drives super-winds with large mass-loss rates; however, a significant fraction of the wind material falls back on to the discs at later times, leading to higher post-starburst SFRs in the presence of stellar feedback. This suggests that strong active galactic nucleus feedback may be required to explain the sharp cut-offs in SFR that are observed in post-merger galaxies. We compare the results to those from simulations with no explicit resolution of GMC or feedback [‘effective equation-of-state’ (EOS) models]. We find that global galaxy properties are similar between EOS and resolved-feedback models. The relic structure and mass profile, and the total mass of stars formed in the nuclear starburst are quite similar, as is the morphological structure during and after mergers (tails, bridges, etc.). Disc survival in sufficiently gas rich mergers is similar in the two cases, and the new models follow the same scalings as derived for the efficiency of disc re-formation after a merger as derived from previous work with the simplified EOS models. While the global galaxy properties are similar between EOS and feedback models, subgalaxy-scale properties and the SFRs can be quite different: the more detailed models exhibit significantly higher star formation in tails and bridges (especially in shocks), and allow us to resolve the formation of super star clusters. In the new models, the star formation is more strongly time-variable and drops more sharply between close passages. The instantaneous burst enhancement can be higher or lower, depending on the details of the orbit and initial structural properties of the galaxies; first-passage bursts are more sensitive to these details than those at the final coalescence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
McKee, C. F., & Ostriker, J. P. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155667 · Cited by 2,082 · cited 1×
“In the model of Springel & Hernquist (2003), the effective pressure is motivated by the ISM model in McKee & Ostriker (1977).”
MethodMartin, D. C., Wyder, T. K., Schiminovich, D., Barlow, T. A., Forster, K., Friedman, P. G., Morrissey, P., Neff, S. G., Seibert, M., Small, T., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/516639 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Self-citationGalaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): end of survey report and data release 2
Liske, J., Baldry, I. K., Driver, S. P., Tuffs, R. J., Alpaslan, M., Andrae, E., Brough, S., Cluver, M. E., Grootes, M. W., Gunawardhana, M. L. P., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1436 · Cited by 592
Bluck, A. F. L., Mendel, J. T., Ellison, S. L., Moreno, J., Simard, L., Patton, D. R., & Starkenburg, E. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu594 · Cited by 261
Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): galaxy close pairs, mergers and the future fate of stellar mass
Robotham, A. S. G., Driver, S. P., Davies, L. J. M., Hopkins, A. M., Baldry, I. K., Agius, N. K., Bauer, A. E., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Brough, S., Brown, M. J. I., et al. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1604 · Cited by 165
Deep learning predictions of galaxy merger stage and the importance of observational realism
Bottrell, C., Hani, M. H., Teimoorinia, H., Ellison, S. L., Moreno, J., Torrey, P., Hayward, C. C., Thorp, M., Simard, L., & Hernquist, L. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2934 · Cited by 113
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Hernquist, L., Narayanan, D., Hayward, C. C., & Murray, N.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-02-09
- Volume
- 430
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1901-1927
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2033668875
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Star formation in galaxy mergers with realistic models of stellar feedback and the interstellar medium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt017
- The paper
- Hopkins, P. F., Cox, T. J., Hernquist, L., Narayanan, D., Hayward, C. C., & Murray, N. (2013). Star formation in galaxy mergers with realistic models of stellar feedback and the interstellar medium. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.