The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toy models for galaxy formation versus simulations
Open accessAbstract
We describe simple useful toy models for key processes of galaxy formation in its most active phase, at z > 1, and test the approximate expressions against the typical behaviour in a suite of high-resolution hydro-cosmological simulations of massive galaxies at z=4−1. We address in particular the evolution of (a) the total mass inflow rate from the cosmic web into galactic haloes based on the EPS approximation, (b) the penetration of baryonic streams into the inner galaxy, (c) the disc size, (d) the implied steady-state gas content and star formation rate (SFR) in the galaxy subject to mass conservation and a universal star formation law, (e) the inflow rate within the disc to a central bulge and black hole as derived using energy conservation and self-regulated Q ∼ 1 violent disc instability (VDI) and (f) the implied steady state in the disc and bulge. The toy models provide useful approximations for the behaviour of the simulated galaxies. We find that (a) the inflow rate is proportional to mass and to (1 + z)5/2, (b) the penetration to the inner halo is ∼50 per cent at z=4−2, (c) the disc radius is ∼5 per cent of the virial radius, (d) the galaxies reach a steady state with the SFR following the accretion rate into the galaxy, (e) there is an intense gas inflow through the disc, comparable to the SFR, following the predictions of VDI and (f) the galaxies approach a steady state with the bulge mass comparable to the disc mass, where the draining of gas by SFR, outflows and disc inflows is replenished by fresh accretion. Given the agreement with simulations, these toy models are useful for understanding the complex phenomena in simple terms and for back-of-the-envelope predictions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375 · cited 1×
“The deceleration due to dynamical friction is approximated by the Chandrasekhar formula (Binney & Tremaine 2008, sec.”
MethodOn the Gravitational Stability of a Disk of Stars
Toomre, A. (1964) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/147861 · Cited by 3,349 · cited 1×
“Galactic discs at high redshift are expected to develop a gravitational disc instability with a Toomre instability parameter Q smaller than unity (Toomre 1964).”
BackgroundThe statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
The origin of dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation
Dekel, A., & Silk, J. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164050 · Cited by 1,919 · cited 1×
“The heating rate due to feedback may or may not overcome the cooling rate, depending on the gas conditions in the starforming regions (Dekel & Silk 1986; Ceverino & Klypin 2009).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Cited by
The EAGLE project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
Schaye, J., Crain, R. A., Bower, R. G., Furlong, M., Schaller, M., Theuns, T., Dalla Vecchia, C., Frenk, C. S., McCarthy, I. G., Helly, J. C., et al. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2058 · Cited by 3,601
De re metallica: the cosmic chemical evolution of galaxies
Maiolino, R., & Mannucci, F. (2019) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0112-2 · Cited by 697
A unified multiwavelength model of galaxy formation
Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., Frenk, C. S., Benson, A. J., Bower, R. G., Cole, S., Gonzalez-Perez, V., Helly, J. C., Lagos, C. D. P., & Mitchell, P. D. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1888 · Cited by 422
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
The Cosmic Baryon and Metal Cycles
Péroux, C., & Howk, J. C. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-021820-120014 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Dekel, A., Zolotov, A., Tweed, D., Cacciato, M., Ceverino, D., & Primack, J. R.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-29
- Volume
- 435
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 999-1019
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2026067461
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toy models for galaxy formation versus simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stt1338
- The paper
- Dekel, A., Zolotov, A., Tweed, D., Cacciato, M., Ceverino, D., & Primack, J. R. (2013). Toy models for galaxy formation versus simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1338
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.