Origin and loss of nebula-captured hydrogen envelopes from ‘sub’- to ‘super-Earths’ in the habitable zone of Sun-like stars
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the origin and loss of captured hydrogen envelopes from protoplanets having masses in a range between ‘sub-Earth’-like bodies of 0.1 M⊕ and ‘super-Earths’ with 5 M⊕ in the habitable zone at 1 au of a Sun-like G star, assuming that their rocky cores had formed before the nebula gas dissipated. We model the gravitational attraction and accumulation of nebula gas around a planet's core as a function of protoplanetary luminosity during accretion and calculate the resulting surface temperature by solving the hydrostatic structure equations for the protoplanetary nebula. Depending on nebular properties, such as the dust grain depletion factor, planetesimal accretion rates, and resulting luminosities, for planetary bodies of 0.1–1 M⊕ we obtain hydrogen envelopes with masses between ∼2.5 × 1019 and 1.5 × 1026 g. For ‘super-Earths’ with masses between 2 and 5 M⊕ more massive hydrogen envelopes within the mass range of ∼7.5 × 1023–1.5 × 1028 g can be captured from the nebula. For studying the escape of these accumulated hydrogen-dominated protoatmospheres, we apply a hydrodynamic upper atmosphere model and calculate the loss rates due to the heating by the high soft-X-ray and extreme ultraviolet (XUV) flux of the young Sun/star. The results of our study indicate that under most nebula conditions ‘sub-Earth’ and Earth-mass planets can lose their captured hydrogen envelopes by thermal escape during the first ∼100 Myr after the disc dissipated. However, if a nebula has a low dust depletion factor or low accretion rates resulting in low protoplanetary luminosities, it is possible that even protoplanets with Earth-mass cores may keep their hydrogen envelopes during their whole lifetime. In contrast to lower mass protoplanets, more massive ‘super-Earths’, which can accumulate a huge amount of nebula gas, lose only tiny fractions of their primordial hydrogen envelopes. Our results agree with the fact that Venus, Earth, and Mars are not surrounded by dense hydrogen envelopes, as well as with the recent discoveries of low density ‘super-Earths’ that most likely could not get rid of their dense protoatmospheres.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The early atmosphere was rapidly eroded by solar wind.
“This early atmosphere was rapidly eroded by the solar wind (Lammer et al. 2014;Massol et al. 2016).”
From The Emergence of Life (2019) · cites this paper as Lammer et al. 2014
Cites
Linked magma ocean solidification and atmospheric growth for Earth and Mars
Elkins-Tanton, L. T. (2008) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.03.062 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Emergence of two types of terrestrial planet on solidification of magma ocean
Hamano, K., Abe, Y., & Genda, H. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12163 · Cited by 402 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…from the luminosity generated by accretion, it is also reasonable to assume that the planetary core stores a fraction of the internal energy generated in the formation process (Elkins-Tanton 2008; Hamano et al. 2013) which is a quite recent event, in any case for a planet in the nebula phase.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stellar winds on the main-sequence: II. The evolution of rotation and winds
Johnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Brott, I., & Lüftinger, T. (2015) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425301 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Self-citationJohnstone, C. P., Güdel, M., Lammer, H., & Kislyakova, K. G. (2018) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832776 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Camprubí, E., de Leeuw, J. W., House, C. H., Raulin, F., Russell, M. J., Spang, A., Tirumalai, M. R., & Westall, F. (2019) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0624-8 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Lammer, H., Sproß, L., Grenfell, J. L., Scherf, M., Fossati, L., Lendl, M., & Cubillos, P. E. (2019) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2018.1914 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationRimmer, P. B., Ferus, M., Waldmann, I. P., Knížek, A., Kalvaitis, D., Ivanek, O., Kubelík, P., Yurchenko, S. N., Burian, T., Dostál, J., et al. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab55e8 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lammer, H., Stökl, A., Erkaev, N. V., Dorfi, E. A., Odert, P., Güdel, M., Kulikov, Y. N., Kislyakova, K. G., & Leitzinger, M.
- Affiliations
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Lammer, H.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-02-17
- Volume
- 439
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3225-3238
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2103083744
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Keywords
- super-Earths, protoplanetary nebulae, thermal escape, planetesimal accretion, habitable zone, Earth-mass planets
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review