The DOI matches its Crossref record; 226 of the 226 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What controls star formation in the central 500 pc of the Galaxy?
Open accessAbstract
The star formation rate (SFR) in the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ, i.e. the central 500 pc) of the Milky Way is lower by a factor of ≥10 than expected for the substantial amount of dense gas it contains, which challenges current star formation theories. In this paper, we quantify which physical mechanisms could be responsible. On scales larger than the disc scaleheight, the low SFR is found to be consistent with episodic star formation due to secular instabilities or possibly variations of the gas inflow along the Galactic bar. The CMZ is marginally Toomre-stable when including gas and stars, but highly Toomre-stable when only accounting for the gas, indicating a low condensation rate of self-gravitating clouds. On small scales, we find that the SFR in the CMZ may be caused by an elevated critical density for star formation due to the high turbulent pressure. The existence of a universal density threshold for star formation is ruled out. The H i–H2 phase transition of hydrogen, the tidal field, a possible underproduction of massive stars due to a bottom-heavy initial mass function, magnetic fields, and cosmic ray or radiation pressure feedback also cannot individually explain the low SFR. We propose a self-consistent cycle of star formation in the CMZ, in which the effects of several different processes combine to inhibit star formation. The rate-limiting factor is the slow evolution of the gas towards collapse – once star formation is initiated it proceeds at a normal rate. The ubiquity of star formation inhibitors suggests that a lowered central SFR should be a common phenomenon in other galaxies. We discuss the implications for galactic-scale star formation and supermassive black hole growth, and relate our results to the star formation conditions in other extreme environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Detailed dynamical modeling suggests that the gas accumulation time for the Milky-Way CMZis about ∼ 10 -50 Myr which represents the expected time scale between two star-formation events, with each event lasting for a dynamical time of a few Myr at the CMZ (Kruijssen et al. 2014; Krumholz et al. 2017; Armillotta et al. 2019, 2020; Sormani et al. 2020b).”
From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Kruijssen et al. 2014
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
STAR FORMATION IN GALAXIES ALONG THE HUBBLE SEQUENCE
Kennicutt, R. C. (1998) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.36.1.189 · Cited by 6,578
Self-citationThe Global Schmidt law in star forming galaxies
Kennicutt, R., & Jr. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305588 · Cited by 4,027
Self-citationGalactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass FunctionPreprint
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Cited by 4,012
Star Formation in Galaxies Along the Hubble Sequence
Kennicutt, R. C., & Words, K. (1998) · Cited by 3,712
Self-citationMannings, V., Boss, A., & Russell, S. (2000) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6299 · Cited by 3,354
On the Gravitational Stability of a Disk of Stars
Toomre, A. (1964) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/147861 · Cited by 3,349 · cited 4×
“…star formation may be related to the global gravitational (in)stability of star-forming discs– if the kinematics of a gas disc are such that it can withstand global collapse, star formation is suppressed (Toomre 1964; Quirk 1972; Fall& Efstathiou 1980; Kennicutt 1989; Martin & Kennicutt 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialEnergy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies
Matteo, T. D., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03335 · Cited by 3,235
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902 · cited 1×
“The typical range of power law indices isN = 1–2, whether Σ refers to dense or all gas, and across a range of spatial scales (Kennicutt 1998a,b; Bigiel et al. 2008; Liu et al. 2011; Ladaet al. ⋆ kruijssen@mpa-garching.mpg.de 2012; Kennicutt & Evans 2012).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Altenhoff, 1979, A&AS, 35, 23
- Bothwell, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 219
- Dahmen, 1998, A&A, 331, 959
- Elmegreen, 1993, Star Formation, Galaxies and the Interstellar Medium, 337
- Elmegreen, 1997, Rev. Mex. Astron. Astrofis. Conf. Ser., 6, 165
- Glover, 2012, MNRAS, 421, 9
- Habe, 1992, PASJ, 44, 203
- Kruijssen, 2014, MNRAS, 3239
- Loose, 1982, A&A, 105, 342
- Lopez, 2013, ApJ
- Oort, 1927, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth., 3, 275
- Padoan, 2014, Protostars and Planets VI
- Rathborne, 2014, ApJ
- Scoville, 1987, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 134, Interstellar Processes, 21
- Wakker, 1997, ARA&A, 35, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.217 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
High-Mass Star and Massive Cluster Formation in the Milky Way
Motte, F., Bontemps, S., & Louvet, F. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055235 · Cited by 493
Globular clusters as the relics of regular star formation in ‘normal’ high-redshift galaxies
Kruijssen, J. M. D. (2015) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2026 · Cited by 318
Self-citationA unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport
Krumholz, M. R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J. C., & Crocker, R. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty852 · Cited by 332
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Dale, J., & Longmore, S. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2526 · Cited by 194
Self-citationCloud-scale Molecular Gas Properties in 15 Nearby Galaxies
孙嘉, J. 懿. S., Leroy, A. K., Schruba, A., Rosolowsky, E. W., Hughes, A., Kruijssen, J. M. D., Meidt, S. E., Schinnerer, E., Blanc, G. A., Bigiel, F., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac326 · Cited by 242
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruijssen, J. M. D., Longmore, S. N., Elmegreen, B. G., Murray, N., Bally, J., Testi, L., & Kennicutt, R. C.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- European Southern Observatory (DE)
- IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kruijssen, J. M. Diederik
- ORCID
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-17
- Volume
- 440
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3370-3391
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W1974701556
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 226
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1066293)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- California Institute of Technology
- Aspen Center for Physics (1066293, PHY-1066293)
- Johns Hopkins University
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/L00061X/1, ST/H00243X/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Keywords
- star formation rate, Central Molecular Zone, Milky Way, secular instability, galactic bars, gas inflow, turbulent pressure, critical density threshold, tidal field, magnetic field, cosmic ray feedback, supermassive black hole growth, dense gas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
