Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comprehensive nucleosynthesis analysis for ejecta of compact binary mergers

Open access
Just, O., Bauswein, A., Pulpillo, R. Ardevol, Goriely, S., Janka, H.-T.·2015·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We present the first comprehensive study of r-process element nucleosynthesis in the ejecta of compact binary mergers (CBMs) and their relic black hole (BH)–torus systems. The evolution of the BH–accretion tori is simulated for seconds with a Newtonian hydrodynamics code including viscosity effects, pseudo-Newtonian gravity for rotating BHs, and an energy-dependent two-moment closure scheme for the transport of electron neutrinos and antineutrinos. The investigated cases are guided by relativistic double neutron star (NS–NS) and NS–BH merger models, producing ∼3–6 M⊙ BHs with rotation parameters of ABH ∼ 0.8 and tori of 0.03–0.3 M⊙. Our nucleosynthesis analysis includes the dynamical (prompt) ejecta expelled during the CBM phase and the neutrino and viscously driven outflows of the relic BH–torus systems. While typically ∼20–25 per cent of the initial accretion-torus mass are lost by viscously driven outflows, neutrino-powered winds contribute at most another ∼1 per cent, but neutrino heating enhances the viscous ejecta significantly. Since BH–torus ejecta possess a wide distribution of electron fractions (0.1–0.6) and entropies, they produce heavy elements from A ∼ 80 up to the actinides, with relative contributions of A ≳ 130 nuclei being subdominant and sensitively dependent on BH and torus masses and the exact treatment of shear viscosity. The combined ejecta of CBM and BH–torus phases can reproduce the solar abundances amazingly well for A ≳ 90. Varying contributions of the torus ejecta might account for observed variations of lighter elements with 40 ≤ Z ≤ 56 relative to heavier ones, and a considerable reduction of the prompt ejecta compared to the torus ejecta, e.g. in highly asymmetric NS–BH mergers, might explain the composition of heavy-element deficient stars.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 602

Metadata

Authors
Just, O., Bauswein, A., Pulpillo, R. A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
448
Issue
1
Pages
541-567
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2157732302
Cited by
602
References
1
FWCI
40.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive nucleosynthesis analysis for ejecta of compact binary mergers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv009
The paper
Just, O., Bauswein, A., Pulpillo, R. A., Goriely, S., & Janka, H.-T. (2015). Comprehensive nucleosynthesis analysis for ejecta of compact binary mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.