Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The universality of the virial halo mass function and models for non-universality of other halo definitions

Open access
Despali, Giulia, Giocoli, Carlo, Angulo, Raul E., Tormen, Giuseppe, Sheth, Ravi K., Baso, Giacomo, Moscardini, Lauro·2016·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The abundance of galaxy clusters can constrain both the geometry and growth of structure in our Universe. However, this probe could be significantly complicated by recent claims of non-universality–non-trivial dependences with respect to the cosmological model and redshift. In this work, we analyse the dependence of the mass function on the way haloes are identified and establish if this can cause departures from universality. In order to explore this dependence, we use a set of different N-body cosmological simulations (Le SBARBINE simulations), with the latest cosmological parameters from the Planck collaboration; this first suite of simulations is followed by a lower resolution set, carried out with different cosmological parameters. We identify dark matter haloes using a spherical overdensity algorithm with varying overdensity thresholds (virial, 2000, 1000, 500, 200 ρc and 200 ρb) at all redshifts. We notice that, when expressed in terms of the rescaled variable ν, the mass function for virial haloes is a nearly universal as a function of redshift and cosmology, while this is clearly not the case for the other overdensities we considered. We provide fitting functions for the halo mass function parameters as a function of overdensity, that allow us to predict, to within a few per cent accuracy, the halo mass function for a wide range of halo definitions, redshifts and cosmological models. We then show how the departures from universality associated with other halo definitions can be derived by combining the universality of the virial definition with the expected shape of the density profile of haloes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stv2842

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Despali, G., Giocoli, C., Angulo, R. E., Tormen, G., Sheth, R. K., Baso, G., & Moscardini, L.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2015-12-31
Volume
456
Issue
3
Pages
2486-2504
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W991013512
Cited by
266
References
69
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The universality of the virial halo mass function and models for non-universality of other halo definitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv2842
The paper
Despali, G., Giocoli, C., Angulo, R. E., Tormen, G., Sheth, R. K., Baso, G., & Moscardini, L. (2016). The universality of the virial halo mass function and models for non-universality of other halo definitions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2842

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.