The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of the brightest Lyα emitters at z = 6.6: implications for the evolution of the luminosity function in the reionization era
Open accessAbstract
Using wide-field narrow-band surveys, we provide a new measurement of the z = 6.6 Lymanα emitter (LAE) luminosity function (LF), which constraints the bright end for the first time. We use a combination of archival narrow-band NB921 data in UDS and new NB921 measurements in SA22 and COSMOS/UltraVISTA, all observed with the Subaru telescope, with a total area of ∼5 deg2. We exclude lower redshift interlopers by using broad-band optical and near-infrared photometry and also exclude three supernovae with data split over multiple epochs. Combining the UDS and COSMOS samples, we find no evolution of the bright end of the Lyα LF between z = 5.7 and 6.6, which is supported by spectroscopic follow-up, and conclude that sources with Himiko-like luminosity are not as rare as previously thought, with number densities of ∼1.5 × 10−5 Mpc−3. Combined with our wide-field SA22 measurements, our results indicate a non-Schechter-like bright end of the LF at z = 6.6 and a different evolution of observed faint and bright LAEs, overcoming cosmic variance. This differential evolution is also seen in the spectroscopic follow-up of UV-selected galaxies and is now also confirmed for LAEs, and we argue that it may be an effect of reionization. Using a toy model, we show that such differential evolution of the LF is expected, since brighter sources are able to ionize their surroundings earlier, such that Lyα photons are able to escape. Our targets are excellent candidates for detailed follow-up studies and provide the possibility to give a unique view on the earliest stages in the formation of galaxies and reionization process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)
Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M. D., Schneider, S., Carpenter, J. M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/498708 · Cited by 12,019
Cited by
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
Stellar population effects on the inferred photon density at reionization
Stanway, E. R., Eldridge, J. J., & Becker, G. D. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2661 · Cited by 367
Conditions for Reionizing the Universe with a Low Galaxy Ionizing Photon Escape Fraction
Finkelstein, S. L., D’Aloisio, A., Paardekooper, J.-P., Ryan, R., Jr., Behroozi, P., Finlator, K., Livermore, R., Sanderbeck, P. R. U., Vecchia, C. D., & Khochfar, S. (2019) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea8 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Santos, S., Röttgering, H., Darvish, B., & Mobasher, B.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-05-27
- Volume
- 451
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 400-417
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2235062852
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of the brightest Lyα emitters at z = 6.6: implications for the evolution of the luminosity function in the reionization era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stv947
- The paper
- Matthee, J., Sobral, D., Santos, S., Röttgering, H., Darvish, B., & Mobasher, B. (2015). Identification of the brightest Lyα emitters at z = 6.6: implications for the evolution of the luminosity function in the reionization era. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.