The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: modelling the clustering and halo occupation distribution of BOSS CMASS galaxies in the Final Data Release
Open accessAbstract
We present a study of the clustering and halo occupation distribution of Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) CMASS galaxies in the redshift range 0.43 < z < 0.7 drawn from the Final SDSS-III Data Release. We compare the BOSS results with the predictions of a halo abundance matching (HAM) clustering model that assigns galaxies to dark matter haloes selected from the large BigMultiDark N-body simulation of a flat Λ cold dark matter Planck cosmology. We compare the observational data with the simulated ones on a light cone constructed from 20 subsequent outputs of the simulation. Observational effects such as incompleteness, geometry, veto masks and fibre collisions are included in the model, which reproduces within 1σ errors the observed monopole of the two-point correlation function at all relevant scales: from the smallest scales, 0.5 h−1 Mpc, up to scales beyond the baryon acoustic oscillation feature. This model also agrees remarkably well with the BOSS galaxy power spectrum (up to k ∼ 1 h Mpc−1), and the three-point correlation function. The quadrupole of the correlation function presents some tensions with observations. We discuss possible causes that can explain this disagreement, including target selection effects. Overall, the standard HAM model describes remarkably well the clustering statistics of the CMASS sample. We compare the stellar-to-halo mass relation for the CMASS sample measured using weak lensing in the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope Stripe 82 Survey with the prediction of our clustering model, and find a good agreement within 1σ. The BigMD-BOSS light cone including properties of BOSS galaxies and halo properties is made publicly available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
Self-citationTHE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
Self-citationThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citationMultiDark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles
Klypin, A., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., Prada, F., & Heß, S. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw248 · Cited by 970
Self-citation
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Cosmological parameters from the BOSS galaxy power spectrum
Ivanov, M. M., Simonović, M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/042 · Cited by 441
Beutler, F., Seo, H.-J., Ross, A. J., McDonald, P., Saito, S., Bolton, A. S., Brownstein, J. R., Chuang, C.-H., Cuesta, A. J., Eisenstein, D. J., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2373 · Cited by 267
Self-citationCosmological reconstruction from galaxy light: neural network based light-matter connection
Modi, C., Feng, Y., & Seljak, U. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/028 · Cited by 86
Full-shape galaxy power spectra and the curvature tension
Glanville, A., Howlett, C., & Davis, T. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2891 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodríguez-Torres, S. A., Chuang, C.-H., Prada, F., Guo, H., Klypin, A., Behroozi, P., Hahn, C. H., Comparat, J., Yepes, G., Montero-Dorta, A. D., Brownstein, J. R., Maraston, C., McBride, C. K., Tinker, J., Gottlöber, S., Favole, G., Shu, Y., Kitaura, F.-S., Bolton, A., Scoccimarro, R., Samushia, L., Schlegel, D., Schneider, D. P., & Thomas, D.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-04-29
- Volume
- 460
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1173-1187
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2258945625
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: modelling the clustering and halo occupation distribution of BOSS CMASS galaxies in the Final Data Release. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stw1014
- The paper
- Rodríguez-Torres, S. A., Chuang, C.-H., Prada, F., Guo, H., Klypin, A., Behroozi, P., Hahn, C. H., Comparat, J., Yepes, G., Montero-Dorta, A. D., Brownstein, J. R., Maraston, C., McBride, C. K., Tinker, J., Gottlöber, S., Favole, G., Shu, Y., Kitaura, F.-S., Bolton, A., . . . Thomas, D. (2016). The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: modelling the clustering and halo occupation distribution of BOSS CMASS galaxies in the Final Data Release. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.