Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of mergers and halo spin in shaping galaxy morphology

Open access
Rodriguez-Gomez, Vicente, Sales, Laura V., Genel, Shy, Pillepich, Annalisa, Zjupa, Jolanta, Nelson, Dylan, Griffen, Brendan, Torrey, Paul, Snyder, Gregory F., Vogelsberger, Mark, Springel, Volker, Ma, Chung-Pei, Hernquist, Lars·2017·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

Mergers and the spin of the dark matter halo are factors traditionally believed to determine the morphology of galaxies within a Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmology. We study this hypothesis by considering approximately 18 000 central galaxies at z = 0 with stellar masses M* = 109–1012 M⊙ selected from the Illustris cosmological hydrodynamic simulation. The fraction of accreted stars – which measures the importance of massive, recent and dry mergers – increases steeply with galaxy stellar mass, from less than 5 per cent in dwarfs to 80 per cent in the most massive objects, and the impact of mergers on galaxy morphology increases accordingly. For galaxies with M* ≳ 1011 M⊙, mergers have the expected effect: If gas-poor, they promote the formation of spheroidal galaxies, whereas gas-rich mergers favour the formation and survivability of massive discs. This trend, however, breaks at lower masses. For objects with M* ≲ 1011 M⊙, mergers do not seem to play any significant role in determining the morphology, with accreted stellar fractions and mean merger gas fractions that are indistinguishable between spheroidal and disc-dominated galaxies. On the other hand, halo spin correlates with morphology primarily in the least massive objects in the sample (M* ≲ 1010 M⊙), but only weakly for galaxies above that mass. Our results support a scenario where (1) mergers play a dominant role in shaping the morphology of massive galaxies, (2) halo spin is important for the morphology of dwarfs, and (3) the morphology of medium-sized galaxies – including the Milky Way – shows little dependence on galaxy assembly history or halo spin, at least when these two factors are considered individually.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/stx305

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Sales, L. V., Genel, S., Pillepich, A., Zjupa, J., Nelson, D., Griffen, B., Torrey, P., Snyder, G. F., Vogelsberger, M., Springel, V., Ma, C.-P., & Hernquist, L.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2017-02-06
Volume
467
Issue
3
Pages
3083-3098
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2529434142
Cited by
199
References
3
FWCI
12.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of mergers and halo spin in shaping galaxy morphology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stx305
The paper
Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Sales, L. V., Genel, S., Pillepich, A., Zjupa, J., Nelson, D., Griffen, B., Torrey, P., Snyder, G. F., Vogelsberger, M., Springel, V., Ma, C.-P., & Hernquist, L. (2017). The role of mergers and halo spin in shaping galaxy morphology. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.