Cited by 65Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

A deep learning approach to test the small-scale galaxy morphology and its relationship with star formation activity in hydrodynamical simulations

Open access
Zanisi, Lorenzo, Huertas-Company, Marc, Lanusse, François, Bottrell, Connor, Pillepich, Annalisa, Nelson, Dylan, Rodriguez-Gomez, Vicente, Shankar, Francesco +5 more·2021·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

ABSTRACT Hydrodynamical simulations of galaxy formation and evolution attempt to fully model the physics that shapes galaxies. The agreement between the morphology of simulated and real galaxies, and the way the morphological types are distributed across galaxy scaling relations are important probes of our knowledge of galaxy formation physics. Here, we propose an unsupervised deep learning approach to perform a stringent test of the fine morphological structure of galaxies coming from the Illustris and IllustrisTNG (TNG100 and TNG50) simulations against observations from a subsample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Our framework is based on PixelCNN, an autoregressive model for image generation with an explicit likelihood. We adopt a strategy that combines the output of two PixelCNN networks in a metric that isolates the small-scale morphological details of galaxies from the sky background. We are able to quantitatively identify the improvements of IllustrisTNG, particularly in the high-resolution TNG50 run, over the original Illustris. However, we find that the fine details of galaxy structure are still different between observed and simulated galaxies. This difference is mostly driven by small, more spheroidal, and quenched galaxies that are globally less accurate regardless of resolution and which have experienced little improvement between the three simulations explored. We speculate that this disagreement, that is less severe for quenched discy galaxies, may stem from a still too coarse numerical resolution, which struggles to properly capture the inner, dense regions of quenched spheroidal galaxies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/staa3864

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zanisi et al. (2021) use the likelihood ratio from Ren et al. (2019) to correct for this effect.

    “To correct for this effect, the authors use instead the likelihood ratio presented in Ren et al. (2019) which forces the metric to become sensitive to the fine grained structure of galaxies.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Zanisi et al. (2021)

  • The likelihood ratio metric is able to measure the improvement in the realism of cosmological simulations from the first Illustris model to the updated TNG one.

    “They can then show how the likelihood ratio metric is residual able to measure the improvement in the realism of cosmological simulations from the first Illustris model to the updated TNG one (Figure 38).”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Zanisi et al. (2021)

  • Zanisi et al. (2021) explores whether anomaly detection with deep learning can compare galaxy images from cosmological simulations to observations.

    “Zanisi et al. (2021) also explores whether anomaly detection approaches with deep learning can be used to compare galaxy images from cosmological simulations to observations.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Zanisi et al. (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zanisi, L., Huertas-Company, M., Lanusse, F., Bottrell, C., Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Shankar, F., Hernquist, L., Dekel, A., Margalef-Bentabol, B., Vogelsberger, M., & Primack, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC); Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna (ULL), E-38200 La Laguna, Spain
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 72-3, 58089 Morelia, Mexico
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Zanisi, Lorenzo
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2020-12-16
Volume
501
Issue
3
Pages
4359-4382
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3039233188
Cited by
65
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
galaxy morphology, star formation activity, galaxy formation and evolution, fluid simulation, Illustris, IllustrisTNG, PixelCNN, unsupervised deep learning, galaxy scaling relations, disk galaxies, numerical resolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review