The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Concerning the SPH method, known numerical issues are related to surface and contact discontinuities (e.g.Hosono et al., 2013;Reinhardt and Stadel, 2017) or rotational instabilities in rigid body rotations (e.g.Speith, 2006).”
From SPH calculations of Mars-scale collisions: The role of the equation of state, material rheologies, and numerical effects (2018) · cites this paper as Reinhardt and Stadel, 2017
In the citing paper
“It is known that standard SPH has problems handling sharp density changes, at boundaries between materials and at the surface.”
From SPH calculations of Mars-scale collisions: The role of the equation of state, material rheologies, and numerical effects (2018) · cites this paper as Reinhardt and Stadel, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 6×
“The impact sends a strong shock through both bodies destroying most of the impactor and the ejected material forms an arm like structure for both methods which is consistent with prior results (Canup & Asphaug 2001).”
MethodResultInfluentialSimulations of a late lunar-forming impact
Canup, R. M. (2004) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028 · Cited by 669
Forming a Moon with an Earth-like composition via a giant impact
Canup, R. M. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226073 · Cited by 656
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 1999, Icarus, 142, 219, 10.1006/icar.1999.6201 · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, A&A, 561, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322293 · DOI
- 1995, J. Comput. Phys., 121, 357, 10.1016/S0021-9991(95)90221-X · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Icarus, 142, 5, 10.1006/icar.1999.6204 · DOI · Paper page
- 1986, Icarus, 66, 515, 10.1016/0019-1035(86)90088-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 1987, Icarus, 71, 30, 10.1016/0019-1035(87)90160-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, Icarus, 81, 113, 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90129-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Space Sci. Rev., 132, 189, 10.1007/s11214-007-9284-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, Procedia Eng., 58, 461, 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.053 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.053
- 1991, Icarus, 92, 204, 10.1016/0019-1035(91)90046-V · DOI · Paper page
- 1976, 7, 120
- 2004, ARA&A, 42, 441, 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.082201.113457 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, AJ, 141, 35, 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/35 · DOI
- 2015, Icarus, 252, 334, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.02.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, MNRAS, 425, 1068, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21439.x · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, Nature, 433, 842, 10.1038/nature03360 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, ApJ, 744, 137, 10.1088/0004-637X/744/2/137 · DOI
- 2015, Icarus, 262, 58, 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.08.029 · DOI · Paper page
- 2005, ApJ, 622, 759, 10.1086/427976 · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Icarus, 271, 131, 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.01.036 · DOI
- 2013, Nature, 494, 207, 10.1038/nature11892 · doi:10.1038/nature11892
- 2012, ApJ, 745, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/745/1/79 · DOI · Paper page
- 2011, Icarus, 211, 960, 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.10.032 · DOI · Paper page
- 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process, 253
- 2007, Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 42, 2079, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2007.tb01009.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1985, Comput. Phys. Rep., 3, 71, 10.1016/0167-7977(85)90010-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, ARA&A, 30, 543, 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.002551 · DOI · Paper page
- 2012, MNRAS, 420, L33, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01187.x · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2011.01187.x
- 1997, ApJ
- 2013, ApJ, 768, 44, 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/44 · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, ARA&A, 48, 391, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130914 · DOI · Paper page
- 2002, MNRAS, 333, 649, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05445.x · DOI · Paper page
- 1999, Astrophysics Source Code Library
- 1962, Metallic Equations of State for Hypervelocity Impact. Rep. GA-3216, July 18, Gen. At., San Diego, CA
- 1992, Icarus, 100, 326, 10.1016/0019-1035(92)90104-F · DOI · Paper page
- 2006, ApJ, 638, 1180, 10.1086/499032 · DOI
- 2004, New Astron., 9, 137, 10.1016/j.newast.2003.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 2001, Science, 294, 345, 10.1126/science.1063037 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, MNRAS, 376, 1173, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11498.x
Cited by
Emsenhuber, A., Jutzi, M., & Benz, W. (2018) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.09.017 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Reinhardt, C., & Stadel, J.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-02-08
- Volume
- 467
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 4252-4263
- ISSN
- 0035-8711
- 1365-2966
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Swiss National Science Foundation (200020_162930/1)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/stx322
- The paper
- Reinhardt, C., & Stadel, J. (2017). Numerical aspects of giant impact simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx322
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
