The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. I. OUTCOME REGIMES AND SCALING LAWS
Open accessAbstract
Collisions are the core agent of planet formation. In this work, we derive an analytic description of the dynamical outcome for any collision between gravity-dominated bodies. We conduct high-resolution simulations of collisions between planetesimals; the results are used to isolate the effects of different impact parameters on collision outcome. During growth from planetesimals to planets, collision outcomes span multiple regimes: cratering, merging, disruption, super-catastrophic disruption, and hit-and-run events. We derive equations (scaling laws) to demarcate the transition between collision regimes and to describe the size and velocity distributions of the post-collision bodies. The scaling laws are used to calculate maps of collision outcomes as a function of mass ratio, impact angle, and impact velocity, and we discuss the implications of the probability of each collision regime during planet formation. Collision outcomes are described in terms of the impact conditions and the catastrophic disruption criteria, Q * RD —the specific energy required to disperse half the total colliding mass. All planet formation and collisional evolution studies have assumed that catastrophic disruption follows pure energy scaling; however, we find that catastrophic disruption follows nearly pure momentum scaling. As a result, Q * RD is strongly dependent on the impact velocity and projectile-to-target mass ratio in addition to the total mass and impact angle. To account for the impact angle, we derive the interacting mass fraction of the projectile; the outcome of a collision is dependent on the kinetic energy of the interacting mass rather than the kinetic energy of the total mass. We also introduce a new material parameter, c *, that defines the catastrophic disruption criteria between equal-mass bodies in units of the specific gravitational binding energy. For a diverse range of planetesimal compositions and internal structures, c * has a value of 5 ± 2; whereas for strengthless planets, we find c * = 1.9 ± 0.3. We refer to the catastrophic disruption criteria for equal-mass bodies as the principal disruption curve, which is used as the reference value in the calculation of Q * RD for any collision scenario. The analytic collision model presented in this work will significantly improve the physics of collisions in numerical simulations of planet formation and collisional evolution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration
Walsh, K. J., Morbidelli, A., Raymond, S. N., O'Brien, D. P., & Mandell, A. M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10201 · Cited by 1,241
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/19 · Cited by 1,042
Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the Earth
Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., Petit, J. M., Robert, F., Valsecchi, G. B., & Cyr, K. E. (2000) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x · Cited by 881
Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact
Canup, R. M. (2004) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028 · Cited by 669
The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters
Howard, A. W., Marcy, G. W., Johnson, J. A., Fischer, D. A., Wright, J. T., Isaacson, H., Valenti, J. A., Anderson, J., Lin, D. N. C., & Ida, S. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194854 · Cited by 635
Lunar-forming collisions with pre-impact rotation
CANUP, R. (2008) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2008.03.011 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Making the Moon from a Fast-Spinning Earth: A Giant Impact Followed by Resonant Despinning
Ćuk, M., & Stewart, S. T. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225542 · Cited by 680
Self-citationWidespread mixing and burial of Earth’s Hadean crust by asteroid impacts
Marchi, S., Bottke, W. F., Elkins-Tanton, L. T., Bierhaus, M., Wuennemann, K., Morbidelli, A., & Kring, D. A. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13539 · Cited by 277
STIS CORONAGRAPHIC IMAGING OF FOMALHAUT: MAIN BELT STRUCTURE AND THE ORBIT OF FOMALHAUT b
Kalas, P., Graham, J. R., Fitzgerald, M. P., & Clampin, M. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/56 · Cited by 158
The Demographics of Rocky Free-floating Planets and their Detectability by WFIRST
Barclay, T., Quintana, E. V., Raymond, S. N., & Penny, M. T. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa705b · Cited by 48
Making planet nine: Pebble accretion at 250–750 AU in a gravitationally unstable ring
Kenyon, S. J., & Bromley, B. C. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/33 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-12-29
- Volume
- 745
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2159723795
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. I. OUTCOME REGIMES AND SCALING LAWS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/79
- The paper
- Leinhardt, Z. M., & Stewart, S. T. (2012). COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. I. OUTCOME REGIMES AND SCALING LAWS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/745/1/79
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.