Cited by 162Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

Clustered supernovae drive powerful galactic winds after superbubble breakout

Open access
Fielding, Drummond, Quataert, Eliot, Martizzi, Davide·2018·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

We use three-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of vertically stratified patches of galactic discs to study how the spatio-temporal clustering of supernovae (SNe) enhances the power of galactic winds. Randomly distributed SNe drive inefficient galactic winds because most supernova remnants lose their energy radiatively before breaking out of the disc. Accounting for the fact that most star formation is clustered alleviates this problem. Superbubbles driven by the combined effects of clustered SNe propagate rapidly enough to break out of galactic discs well before the clusters’ SNe stop going off. The radiative losses post-breakout are reduced dramatically and a large fraction (≳0.2) of the energy released by SNe vents into the halo powering a strong galactic wind. These energetic winds are capable of providing strong preventative feedback and eject substantial mass from the galaxy with outflow rates of the order of the star formation rate. The momentum flux in the wind is only of order that injected by the SNe, because the hot gas vents before doing significant work on the surroundings. We show that our conclusions hold for a range of galaxy properties, both in the local Universe (e.g. M82) and at high redshift (e.g. |$z$| ∼ 2 star-forming galaxies). We further show that if the efficiency of forming star clusters increases with increasing gas surface density, as suggested by theoretical arguments, the condition for star cluster-driven superbubbles to break out of galactic discs corresponds to a threshold star formation rate surface density for the onset of galactic winds |${\sim } 0.03 \,{\rm M}_\odot \,{\rm yr}^{-1} \, {\rm kpc^{-2}}$|⁠, of order that observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/sty2466

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fielding, D., Quataert, E., & Martizzi, D.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Astrophysics Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Corresponding author
Fielding, Drummond
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2018-09-07
Volume
481
Issue
3
Pages
3325-3347
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W2884878244
Cited by
162
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (AST-1715070)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (P300P2_161062)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
galactic winds, star formation rate surface density, star cluster formation, radiative losses, galactic outflows, galactic feedback, Galactic disc, momentum flux, high-redshift star-forming galaxies, M82

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review