The DOI matches its Crossref record; 338 of the 338 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
UniverseMachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0−10
Open accessAbstract
We present a method to flexibly and self-consistently determine individual galaxies’ star formation rates (SFRs) from their host haloes’ potential well depths, assembly histories, and redshifts. The method is constrained by galaxies’ observed stellar mass functions, SFRs (specific and cosmic), quenched fractions, ultraviolet (UV) luminosity functions, UV–stellar mass relations, IRX–UV relations, auto- and cross-correlation functions (including quenched and star-forming subsamples), and quenching dependence on environment; each observable is reproduced over the full redshift range available, up to 0 < z < 10. Key findings include the following: galaxy assembly correlates strongly with halo assembly; quenching correlates strongly with halo mass; quenched fractions at fixed halo mass decrease with increasing redshift; massive quenched galaxies reside in higher-mass haloes than star-forming galaxies at fixed galaxy mass; star-forming and quenched galaxies’ star formation histories at fixed mass differ most at z < 0.5; satellites have large scatter in quenching time-scales after infall, and have modestly higher quenched fractions than central galaxies; Planck cosmologies result in up to 0.3 dex lower stellar – halo mass ratios at early times; and, none the less, stellar mass–halo mass ratios rise at z > 5. Also presented are revised stellar mass – halo mass relations for all, quenched, star-forming, central, and satellite galaxies; the dependence of star formation histories on halo mass, stellar mass, and galaxy SSFR; quenched fractions and quenching time-scale distributions for satellites; and predictions for higher-redshift galaxy correlation functions and weak lensing surface densities. The public data release (DR1) includes the massively parallel (>105 cores) implementation (the UniverseMachine), the newly compiled and remeasured observational data, derived galaxy formation constraints, and mock catalogues including lightcones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“(which is on the low side of, but consistent with the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by Behroozi et al. 2019 and Moster et al. 2019, who find 1 5 10 9 M )”
From Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations (2020) · cites this paper as Behroozi et al. 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. (2013) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/670067 · Cited by 14,336
Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., Bartolo, N., et al. (2016) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,685
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G. A., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,505
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
On the variation of the initial mass function
Kroupa, P. (2001) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x · Cited by 7,499
The Luminosity function and stellar evolution
Salpeter, E. (1955) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/145971 · Cited by 6,816
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical ClusteringPreprint
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · Cited by 6,275
The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star‐forming Galaxies
Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., Kinney, A. L., Koornneef, J., & Storchi‐Bergmann, T. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308692 · Cited by 5,707
THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY
Abazajian, K. N., Adelman-McCarthy, J. K., Agüeros, M. A., Allam, S. S., Prieto, C. A., An, D., Anderson, K. S. J., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/182/2/543 · Cited by 5,341
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Silk, 1998, A&A, 331, L1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Harikane, Y., Ouchi, M., Oguri, M., Ono, Y., Nakajima, K., Isobe, Y., Umeda, H., Mawatari, K., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9 · Cited by 651
CEERS Key Paper. I. An Early Look into the First 500 Myr of Galaxy Formation with JWST
Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Ferguson, H. C., Wilkins, S. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Papovich, C., Yung, L. Y. A., Haro, P. A., Behroozi, P., Dickinson, M., et al. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 · Cited by 538
Self-citationTwo Remarkably Luminous Galaxy Candidates at z ≈ 10–12 Revealed by JWST
Naidu, R. P., Oesch, P. A., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E. J., Suess, K. A., Brammer, G., Whitaker, K. E., Illingworth, G. D., Bouwens, R. J., Tacchella, S., et al. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22 · Cited by 438
Self-citationThe main sequence of star-forming galaxies across cosmic times
Popesso, P., Concas, A., Cresci, G., Belli, S., Rodighiero, G., Inami, H., Dickinson, M., Ilbert, O., Pannella, M., & Elbaz, D. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3214 · Cited by 340
Naidu, R. P., Tacchella, S., Mason, C. A., Bose, S., Oesch, P. A., & Conroy, C. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7cc9 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Arizona (US)
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Behroozi, Peter
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Volume
- 488
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 3143-3194
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2809045192
- Cited by
- 1,243
- References
- 337
- Citations by year
- 2026: 111 · 2025: 222 · 2024: 207 · 2023: 170 · 2022: 187 · 2021: 145 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 66
- FWCI
- 70.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
- UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NAS5-26555)
- Space Telescope Science Institute (HST-HF2-51353.001-A)
- National Science Foundation (1066293, PHY11-25915)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
- University of Arizona
- University of California
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Brookhaven National Laboratory
- Carnegie Mellon University
- University of Florida
- Harvard University
- Johns Hopkins University
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- New Mexico State University
- New York University
- Ohio State University
- Pennsylvania State University
- University of Portsmouth
- Princeton University
- University of Tokyo
- University of Utah
- Vanderbilt University
- University of Virginia
- University of Washington
- Yale University
- Science and Technology Facilities Council
- Australian Respiratory Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Keywords
- galaxy growth, star formation rate, galaxy quenching, stellar mass-halo mass relation, galaxy correlation function, stellar mass function, quenched fraction, star formation history, stellar mass surface density, high-redshift galaxy evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
