Cited by 4Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Quantifying Transcriptome Turnover on Phylogenies by Modeling Gene Expression as a Binary Trait

Open access
Thompson, Ammon, May, Michael R, Hopkins, Ben R, Riedl, Nerisa, Barmina, Olga, Liebeskind, Benjamin J, Zhao, Li, Begun, David +1 more·2025·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Changes in gene expression are a key driver of phenotypic evolution, leading to a persistent interest in the evolution of transcriptomes. Traditionally, gene expression is modeled as a continuous trait, leaving qualitative transitions largely unexplored. In this paper, we detail the development of new Bayesian inference techniques to study the evolutionary turnover of organ-specific transcriptomes, which we define as instances where orthologous genes gain or lose expression in a particular organ. To test these techniques, we analyze the transcriptomes of 2 male reproductive organs, testes and accessory glands, across 11 species of the Drosophila melanogaster species group. We first discretize gene expression states by estimating the probability that each gene is expressed in each organ and species. We then define a phylogenetic model of correlated transcriptome evolution in 2 or more organs and fit it to the expression state data. Inferences under this model imply that many genes have gained and lost expression in each organ, and that the 2 organs experienced accelerated transcriptome turnover on different branches of the Drosophila phylogeny.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msaf106

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Thompson, A., May, M. R., Hopkins, B. R., Riedl, N., Barmina, O., Liebeskind, B. J., Zhao, L., Begun, D., & Kopp, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Kopp, Artyom
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2025-04-30
Volume
42
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W4410776302
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (5F32GM125107-02, R35 GM122592)
  • Human Frontier Science Program Organization (LT000123/2020-L)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
transcriptome evolution, phylogenetic models, orthologs, testis, accessory glands, Drosophila melanogaster species group, Bayesian inference, organ-specific gene expression
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Male, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Testis, Evolution, Molecular, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review