Quantifying Transcriptome Turnover on Phylogenies by Modeling Gene Expression as a Binary Trait
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Changes in gene expression are a key driver of phenotypic evolution, leading to a persistent interest in the evolution of transcriptomes. Traditionally, gene expression is modeled as a continuous trait, leaving qualitative transitions largely unexplored. In this paper, we detail the development of new Bayesian inference techniques to study the evolutionary turnover of organ-specific transcriptomes, which we define as instances where orthologous genes gain or lose expression in a particular organ. To test these techniques, we analyze the transcriptomes of 2 male reproductive organs, testes and accessory glands, across 11 species of the Drosophila melanogaster species group. We first discretize gene expression states by estimating the probability that each gene is expressed in each organ and species. We then define a phylogenetic model of correlated transcriptome evolution in 2 or more organs and fit it to the expression state data. Inferences under this model imply that many genes have gained and lost expression in each organ, and that the 2 organs experienced accelerated transcriptome turnover on different branches of the Drosophila phylogeny.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
Emms, D. M., & Kelly, S. (2019) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1832-y · Cited by 7,676 · see citing works
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…three clock models: a global clock (one rate for the whole tree), uncorrelated relaxed clock (UCLN) with one rate for each branch which is uncorrelated with neighboring branches, and an autocorrelated relaxed clock model (ACLN) where neighboring branch rates were correlated (Drummond et al. 2006).”
Cis-regulatory elements: Molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence
Wittkopp, P. J., & Kalay, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3095 · Cited by 1,231 · see citing works
Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers
Islam, S., Zeisel, A., Joost, S., La Manno, G., Zajac, P., Kasper, M., Lönnerberg, P., & Linnarsson, S. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2772 · Cited by 1,183 · see citing works
Comparative studies of gene expression and the evolution of gene regulation
Romero, I. G., Ruvinsky, I., & Gilad, Y. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3229 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
RNA sequencing reveals two major classes of gene expression levels in metazoan cells
Hebenstreit, D., Fang, M., Gu, M., Charoensawan, V., van Oudenaarden, A., & Teichmann, S. A. (2011) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2011.28 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Li, J. J., Bickel, P. J., & Biggin, M. D. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.270 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
A neuropeptide circuit that coordinates sperm transfer and copulation duration in <i>Drosophila</i>
Tayler, T. D., Pacheco, D. A., Hergarden, A. C., Murthy, M., & Anderson, D. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1218246109 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Thompson, A., May, M. R., Hopkins, B. R., Riedl, N., Barmina, O., Liebeskind, B. J., Zhao, L., Begun, D., & Kopp, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Rockefeller University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kopp, Artyom
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2025-04-30
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- PMC
- PMC12108096
- OpenAlex
- W4410776302
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (5F32GM125107-02, R35 GM122592)
- Human Frontier Science Program Organization (LT000123/2020-L)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- transcriptome evolution, phylogenetic models, orthologs, testis, accessory glands, Drosophila melanogaster species group, Bayesian inference, organ-specific gene expression
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bayes Theorem, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Male, Models, Genetic, Phylogeny, Testis, Evolution, Molecular, Transcriptome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review