The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fugu Genome Analysis Provides Evidence for a Whole-Genome Duplication Early During the Evolution of Ray-Finned Fishes
Abstract
With about 24,000 extant species, teleosts are the largest group of vertebrates. They constitute more than 99% of the ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) that diverged from the lobe-finned fish lineage (Sarcopterygii) about 450 MYA. Although the role of genome duplication in the evolution of vertebrates is now established, its role in structuring the teleost genomes has been controversial. At least two hypotheses have been proposed: a whole-genome duplication in an ancient ray-finned fish and independent gene duplications in different lineages. These hypotheses are, however, based on small data sets and lack adequate statistical and phylogenetic support. In this study, we have made a systematic comparison of the draft genome sequences of Fugu and humans to identify paralogous chromosomal regions ("paralogons") in the Fugu that arose in the ray-finned fish lineage ("fish-specific"). We identified duplicate genes in the Fugu by phylogenetic analyses of the Fugu, human, and invertebrate sequences. Our analyses provide evidence for 425 fish-specific duplicate genes in the Fugu and show that at least 6.6% of the genome is represented by fish-specific paralogons. We estimated the ages of Fugu duplicate genes and paralogons using the molecular clock. Remarkably, the ages of duplicate genes and paralogons are clustered, with a peak around 350 MYA. These data strongly suggest a whole-genome duplication event early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes, probably before the origin of teleosts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Extensive genomic duplication during early chordate evolution
McLysaght, A., Hokamp, K., & Wolfe, K. H. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng884 · Cited by 530
Gu, X., Wang, Y., & Gu, J. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng902 · Cited by 257
Cited by
Jaillon, O., Aury, J.-M., Brunet, F., Petit, J.-L., Stange-Thomann, N., Mauceli, E., Bouneau, L., Fischer, C., Ozouf-Costaz, C., Bernot, A., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03025 · Cited by 1,966
The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications
Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2600 · Cited by 1,129
The medaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genome evolution
Kasahara, M., Naruse, K., Sasaki, S., Nakatani, Y., Qu, W., Ahsan, B., Yamada, T., Nagayasu, Y., Doi, K., Kasai, Y., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05846 · Cited by 1,038
From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD)
Meyer, A., & Van de Peer, Y. (2005) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20293 · Cited by 945
Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences
Glasauer, S. M. K., & Neuhauss, S. C. F. (2014) · Molecular Genetics and Genomics · doi:10.1007/s00438-014-0889-2 · Cited by 877
Metadata
- Authors
- Christoffels, A., Koh, E. G. L., Chia, J.-M., Brenner, S., Aparicio, S., & Venkatesh, B.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1146-1151
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2103087497
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fugu Genome Analysis Provides Evidence for a Whole-Genome Duplication Early During the Evolution of Ray-Finned Fishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msh114
- The paper
- Christoffels, A., Koh, E. G. L., Chia, J.-M., Brenner, S., Aparicio, S., & Venkatesh, B. (2004). Fugu Genome Analysis Provides Evidence for a Whole-Genome Duplication Early During the Evolution of Ray-Finned Fishes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.