The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Deep Archaeal Roots of Eukaryotes
Open accessAbstract
The set of conserved eukaryotic protein-coding genes includes distinct subsets one of which appears to be most closely related to and, by inference, derived from archaea, whereas another one appears to be of bacterial, possibly, endosymbiotic origin. The "archaeal" genes of eukaryotes, primarily, encode components of information-processing systems, whereas the "bacterial" genes are predominantly operational. The precise nature of the archaeo-eukaryotic relationship remains uncertain, and it has been variously argued that eukaryotic informational genes evolved from the homologous genes of Euryarchaeota or Crenarchaeota (the major branches of extant archaea) or that the origin of eukaryotes lies outside the known diversity of archaea. We describe a comprehensive set of 355 eukaryotic genes of apparent archaeal origin identified through ortholog detection and phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic hypothesis testing using constrained trees, combined with a systematic search for shared derived characters in the form of homologous inserts in conserved proteins, indicate that, for the majority of these genes, the preferred tree topology is one with the eukaryotic branch placed outside the extant diversity of archaea although small subsets of genes show crenarchaeal and euryarchaeal affinities. Thus, the archaeal genes in eukaryotes appear to descend from a distinct, ancient, and otherwise uncharacterized archaeal lineage that acquired some euryarchaeal and crenarchaeal genes via early horizontal gene transfer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward Automatic Reconstruction of a Highly Resolved Tree of Life
Ciccarelli, F. D., Doerks, T., von Mering, C., Creevey, C. J., Snel, B., & Bork, P. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123061 · Cited by 1,663
The Hydrogen Hypothesis for the First Eukaryote
Martin, W., & Müller, M. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/32096 · Cited by 1,282
Prokaryotic Evolution in Light of Gene Transfer
Gogarten, J. P., Doolittle, W. F., & Lawrence, J. G. (2002) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004046 · Cited by 986
Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges
Embley, T. M., & Martin, W. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04546 · Cited by 867
The Endosymbiont Hypothesis Revisited
Gray, M. W. (1992) · International Review of Cytology · doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(08)62068-9 · Cited by 586
Pattern pluralism and the Tree of Life hypothesis
Doolittle, W. F., & Bapteste, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610699104 · Cited by 546
Did DNA replication evolve twice independently?
Leipe, D. D., Aravind, L., & Koonin, E. V. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.17.3389 · Cited by 351 · cited 2×
“…in the form of homologous inserts in conserved proteins, indicate that, for the majority of these genes, the preferred tree topology is one with the eukaryotic branch placed outside the extant diversity of archaea although small subsets of genes show crenarchaeal and euryarchaeal affinities.”
BackgroundSelf-citationEsser, C. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh160 · Cited by 324
Rokas, A., & Carroll, S. B. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040352 · Cited by 315
A korarchaeal genome reveals insights into the evolution of the Archaea
Elkins, J. G., Podar, M., Graham, D. E., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y., Randau, L., Hedlund, B. P., Brochier-Armanet, C., Kunin, V., Anderson, I., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801980105 · Cited by 296
Self-citation
Cited by
Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes
Spang, A., Saw, J. H., Jørgensen, S. L., Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka, K., Martijn, J., Lind, A. E., van Eijk, R., Schleper, C., Guy, L., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14447 · Cited by 1,324
An archaeal origin of eukaryotes supports only two primary domains of life
Williams, T. A., Foster, P. G., Cox, C. J., & Embley, T. M. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12779 · Cited by 519
The archaeal ‘TACK’ superphylum and the origin of eukaryotes
Guy, L., & Ettema, T. J. G. (2011) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2011.09.002 · Cited by 347
The origin and early evolution of eukaryotes in the light of phylogenomics
Koonin, E. V. (2010) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-209 · Cited by 345
Self-citationThe evolution of the cytoskeleton
Wickstead, B., & Gull, K. (2011) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201102065 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Yutin, N., Makarova, K. S., Mekhedov, S. L., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-23
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1619-1630
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2120798255
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Deep Archaeal Roots of Eukaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msn108
- The paper
- Yutin, N., Makarova, K. S., Mekhedov, S. L., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2008). The Deep Archaeal Roots of Eukaryotes. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msn108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.