The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extreme Reconfiguration of Plastid Genomes in the Angiosperm Family Geraniaceae: Rearrangements, Repeats, and Codon Usage
Open accessAbstract
Geraniaceae plastid genomes (plastomes) have experienced a remarkable number of genomic changes. The plastomes of Erodium texanum, Geranium palmatum, and Monsonia speciosa were sequenced and compared with other rosids and the previously published Pelargonium hortorum plastome. Geraniaceae plastomes were found to be highly variable in size, gene content and order, repetitive DNA, and codon usage. Several unique plastome rearrangements include the disruption of two highly conserved operons (S10 and rps2-atpA), and the inverted repeat (IR) region in M. speciosa does not contain all genes in the ribosomal RNA operon. The sequence of M. speciosa is unusually small (128,787 bp); among angiosperm plastomes sequenced to date, only those of nonphotosynthetic species and those that have lost one IR copy are smaller. In contrast, the plastome of P. hortorum is the largest, at 217,942 bp. These genomes have experienced numerous gene and intron losses and partial and complete gene duplications. Some of the losses are shared throughout the family (e.g., trnT-GGU and the introns of rps16 and rpl16); however, other losses are homoplasious (e.g., trnG-UCC intron in G. palmatum and M. speciosa). IR length is also highly variable. The IR in P. hortorum was previously shown to be greatly expanded to 76 kb, and the IR is lost in E. texanum and reduced in G. palmatum (11 kb) and M. speciosa (7 kb). Geraniaceae plastomes contain a high frequency of large repeats (>100 bp) relative to other rosids. Within each plastome, repeats are often located at rearrangement end points and many repeats shared among the four Geraniaceae flank rearrangement end points. GC content is elevated in the genomes and also in coding regions relative to other rosids. Codon usage per amino acid and GC content at third position sites are significantly different for Geraniaceae protein-coding sequences relative to other rosids. Our findings suggest that relaxed selection and/or mutational biases lead to increased GC content, and this in turn altered codon usage. We propose that increases in genomic rearrangements, repetitive DNA, nucleotide substitutions, and GC content may be caused by relaxed selection resulting from improper DNA repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. I. Accuracy Assessment
Ewing, B., Hillier, L., Wendl, M. C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.175 · Cited by 6,967
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Consed: A Graphical Tool for Sequence Finishing
Gordon, D., Abajian, C., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.195 · Cited by 3,302
Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA
Wyman, S. K., Jansen, R. K., & Boore, J. L. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352 · Cited by 2,988
Self-citationThe ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene
Wright, F. (1990) · Gene · doi:10.1016/0378-1119(90)90491-9 · Cited by 2,309
Stothard, P. (2000) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/00286ir01 · Cited by 1,777
Jansen, R. K., Cai, Z., Raubeson, L. A., Daniell, H., dePamphilis, C. W., Leebens-Mack, J., Müller, K. F., Guisinger-Bellian, M., Haberle, R. C., Hansen, A. K., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0709121104 · Cited by 1,218
Self-citationHiratsuka, J., Shimada, H., Whittier, R., Ishibashi, T., Sakamoto, M., Mori, M., Kondo, C., Honji, Y., Sun, C.-R., Meng, B.-Y., et al. (1989) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf02464880 · Cited by 1,194
Dean, F. B., Nelson, J. R., Giesler, T. L., & Lasken, R. S. (2001) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.180501 · Cited by 1,067
Cited by
The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function
Wicke, S., Schneeweiss, G. M., dePamphilis, C. W., Müller, K. F., & Quandt, D. (2011) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-011-9762-4 · Cited by 1,624
Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next‐generation sequencing for plant systematics
Straub, S. C. K., Parks, M., Weitemier, K., Fishbein, M., Cronn, R. C., & Liston, A. (2012) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1100335 · Cited by 696
Weng, M.-L., Blazier, J. C., Govindu, M., & Jansen, R. K. (2014) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst257 · Cited by 411
Self-citationWicke, S., Müller, K. F., de Pamphilis, C. W., Quandt, D., Wickett, N. J., Zhang, Y., Renner, S. S., & Schneeweiss, G. M. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.113.113373 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Guisinger, M. M., Kuehl, J. V., Boore, J. L., & Jansen, R. K.
- Venue
- Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08-30
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 583-600
- ISSN
- 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-1719
- OpenAlex
- W2168596253
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extreme Reconfiguration of Plastid Genomes in the Angiosperm Family Geraniaceae: Rearrangements, Repeats, and Codon Usage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molbev/msq229
- The paper
- Guisinger, M. M., Kuehl, J. V., Boore, J. L., & Jansen, R. K. (2011). Extreme Reconfiguration of Plastid Genomes in the Angiosperm Family Geraniaceae: Rearrangements, Repeats, and Codon Usage. Molecular Biology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.