Cited by 17Photosynthetic Processes and MechanismsPlant Gene Expression AnalysisEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Horizontal Transfer of Promiscuous Activity from Nonphotosynthetic Bacteria Contributed to Evolution of Chlorophyll Degradation Pathway

Obata, Daichi, Takabayashi, Atsushi, Tanaka, Ryouichi, Tanaka, Ayumi, Ito, Hisashi·2019·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

The relationship between enzymes and substrates does not perfectly match the “lock and key” model, because enzymes act on molecules other than their true substrate in different catalytic reactions. Such biologically nonfunctional reactions are called “promiscuous activities.” Promiscuous activities are apparently useless, but they can be an important starting point for enzyme evolution. It has been hypothesized that enzymes with low promiscuous activity will show enhanced promiscuous activity under selection pressure and become new specialists through gene duplication. Although this is the prevailing scenario, there are two major problems: 1) it would not apply to prokaryotes because horizontal gene transfer is more significant than gene duplication and 2) there is no direct evidence that promiscuous activity is low without selection pressure. We propose a new scenario including various levels of promiscuous activity throughout a clade and horizontal gene transfer. STAY-GREEN (SGR), a chlorophyll a—Mg dechelating enzyme, has homologous genes in bacteria lacking chlorophyll. We found that some bacterial SGR homologs have much higher Mg-dechelating activities than those of green plant SGRs, while others have no activity, indicating that the level of promiscuous activity varies. A phylogenetic analysis suggests that a bacterial SGR homolog with high dechelating activity was horizontally transferred to a photosynthetic eukaryote. Some SGR homologs acted on various chlorophyll molecules that are not used as substrates by green plant SGRs, indicating that SGR acquired substrate specificity after transfer to eukaryotes. We propose that horizontal transfer of high promiscuous activity is one process of new enzyme acquisition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msz193

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Obata, D., Takabayashi, A., Tanaka, R., Tanaka, A., & Ito, H.
Affiliations
  • Hokkaido University (JP)
  • Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2019-08-20
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
2830-2841
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2969593848
Cited by
17
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Gene Expression Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
enzyme promiscuity, horizontal gene transfer, stay-green, chlorophyll degradation, enzyme evolution, substrate specificity, photosynthetic eukaryotes
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Chlorophyll, Magnesium, Phylogeny, Substrate Specificity, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Arabidopsis Proteins, Chloroplast Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review