Cited by 515Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Horizontal Transfer, Not Duplication, Drives the Expansion of Protein Families in Prokaryotes

Open access
Treangen, Todd J., Rocha, Eduardo P. C.·2011·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

Gene duplication followed by neo- or sub-functionalization deeply impacts the evolution of protein families and is regarded as the main source of adaptive functional novelty in eukaryotes. While there is ample evidence of adaptive gene duplication in prokaryotes, it is not clear whether duplication outweighs the contribution of horizontal gene transfer in the expansion of protein families. We analyzed closely related prokaryote strains or species with small genomes (Helicobacter, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Sulfolobus), average-sized genomes (Bacillus, Enterobacteriaceae), and large genomes (Pseudomonas, Bradyrhizobiaceae) to untangle the effects of duplication and horizontal transfer. After removing the effects of transposable elements and phages, we show that the vast majority of expansions of protein families are due to transfer, even among large genomes. Transferred genes--xenologs--persist longer in prokaryotic lineages possibly due to a higher/longer adaptive role. On the other hand, duplicated genes--paralogs--are expressed more, and, when persistent, they evolve slower. This suggests that gene transfer and gene duplication have very different roles in shaping the evolution of biological systems: transfer allows the acquisition of new functions and duplication leads to higher gene dosage. Accordingly, we show that paralogs share most protein-protein interactions and genetic regulators, whereas xenologs share very few of them. Prokaryotes invented most of life's biochemical diversity. Therefore, the study of the evolution of biology systems should explicitly account for the predominant role of horizontal gene transfer in the diversification of protein families.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001284

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent theoretical, comparative genomic and experimental research indicates that HGT is the principal factor in microbial adaptation and innovation.

    “Recent theoretical, comparative genomic and experimental research on microbial evolution clearly indicates that HGT is the principal factor in microbial adaptation and innovation (46, 65, 66, 80).”

    From Origin and Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code (2017) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results report that HGT accounts for 88–98% of protein-family expansions in the prokaryotic clades studied. The Discussion says transferred genes can provide advantageous new functions, but hedges that transfer “might” account for most long-term adaptive protein-family expansions. That does not establish HGT as the principal factor in microbial adaptation and innovation generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Horizontal gene transfer remained a key factor of microbial evolution and apparently a condition for long-term survival of microbial populations.

    “Given that HGT, even if limited by both physical and selective barriers, remained a key factor of microbial evolution [36,37,38,39,40], and apparently, a condition for long term survival of microbial populations [41,42]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [56]Vernikos G Thomson N Parkhill J 2007 Genetic flux over time in the Salmonella lineage. Genome Biology 8 R100 17547764 PMC2394748

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Treangen, T. J., & Rocha, E. P. C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Treangen, Todd J.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-01-27
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
e1001284
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2022927779
Cited by
509
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
15.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
horizontal gene transfer, gene duplication, protein family expansion, prokaryotes, paralogs, functional novelty, gene dosage, protein-protein interaction, regulatory genes, genome size, Helicobacter, Neisseria, Streptococcus, Sulfolobus, Bacillus, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas, Bradyrhizobiaceae
MeSH terms
Bacillus, Bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Multigene Family, Neisseria, Phylogeny, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Genome, Bacterial, Sulfolobus, Helicobacter, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Gene Duplication, Gene Transfer, Horizontal, Bradyrhizobiaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review