The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay
Open accessAbstract
Baseline DNA damage in spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men was compared using a modified alkali single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay. Semen from normozoospermic fertile, normozoospermic infertile and asthenozoospermic infertile (World Health Organization criteria, 1992) samples were studied. No significant difference was observed in levels of baseline damage between the three groups. A median value for baseline damage of approximately 20% (80% head DNA) was obtained in all samples. Irradiation with X-rays (5-30 Gy) produced no additional damage in fertile samples when median values were examined. However, irradiation with 30 Gy X-rays produced significant damage in both infertile groups. Hydrogen peroxide (40 microM) treatment induced significant damage in the asthenozoospermic group, whereas 100 microM H2O2 was required to cause significant damage in the normozoospermic fertile and infertile samples. Within the fertile population a subgroup in which percentage head DNA was greater than 80% was observed in both treated and untreated specimens. This subgroup significantly decreased with treatment in both infertile groups. We conclude that the asthenozoospermic infertile group is more susceptible to damage than the normozoospermic infertile group, which in turn is more susceptible than the fertile group. The fertile group contains a resistant subpopulation of spermatozoa with relatively intact DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization
Kruger, T. F., Acosta, A. A., Simmons, K. F., Swanson, R. J., Matta, J. F., & Oehninger, S. (1988) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59660-5 · Cited by 1,159
Cited by
EVENSON, D. P., LARSON, K. L., & JOST, L. K. (2002) · Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1002/j.1939-4640.2002.tb02599.x · Cited by 1,072
Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management
Coughlan, C., Ledger, W., Wang, Q., Liu, F., Demirol, A., Gurgan, T., Cutting, R., Ong, K., Sallam, H., & Li, T. C. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011 · Cited by 904
Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis
Sakkas, D., & Alvarez, J. G. (2010) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.046 · Cited by 782
Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome
Aitken, R. J., & Krausz, C. (2001) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep.0.1220497 · Cited by 730
Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility
Spanò, M., Bonde, J. P., Hjøllund, H. I., Kolstad, H. A., Cordelli, E., & Leter, G. (2000) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00462-8 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, C. M., Lewis, S. E. M., McKelvey-Martin, V. J., & Thompson, W.
- Venue
- Molecular Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 613-619
- ISSN
- 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2407
- OpenAlex
- W2170794875
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molehr/2.8.613
- The paper
- Hughes, C. M., Lewis, S. E. M., McKelvey-Martin, V. J., & Thompson, W. (1996). A comparison of baseline and induced DNA damage in human spermatozoa from fertile and infertile men, using a modified comet assay. Molecular Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/2.8.613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.