Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ooplasmic transfer in mature human oocytes

Cohen, J·1998·Molecular Human Reproduction

Abstract

Ooplasmic transplantation aimed at restoring normal growth in developmentally compromised oocytes and embryos was evaluated in seven couples (eight cycles) with multiple implantation failures. Two approaches were investigated to transfer ooplasm from donor eggs at metaphase II (MII) stage into patient MII eggs: (i) electrofusion of a ooplasmic donor fragment into each patient egg (three cycles), and (ii) direct injection of a small amount of ooplasm from a donor egg into each patient egg (five cycles). Some donor eggs were used multiple times. Donor eggs were divided into two groups, one being used for ooplasmic extraction and the other one for egg donation. Cleaved embryos resulting from the latter were cryopreserved, where numbers and satisfactory development permitted. A second control group consisted of embryos derived from patient eggs after intracytoplasmic sperm injection without ooplasmic transfer. This was performed when sufficient number of eggs were available (n = 5). Donor eggs (n = 40) were evaluated cytogenetically after micromanipulation in order to confirm the presence of chromosomes. One egg was anuclear and the recipient embryos were not transferred. Normal fertilization was significantly higher after injection of ooplasm (63%) in comparison with fusion (23%). Pronuclear anomalies appeared enhanced after fusion with ooplasts. Embryo morphology was not improved in the three cycles with electrofusion and patients did not become pregnant. An improvement in embryo morphology was noted in two patients after injection of ooplasm and both became pregnant, but one miscarried. A third pregnancy was established in the repeat patient, without obvious embryo improvement. One baby was born and the third pregnancy is ongoing with a normal karyotype. Two other patients with male factor infertility had poor embryos after ooplasmic injection, but the donor embryo controls were also poor. The patients did not become pregnant and had no donor embryos frozen. Ooplasmic transfer at the MII stage may be promising in patients with compromised embryos; however, evaluation of ooplasmic anomalies and optimization of techniques will require further investigation prior to widescale application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molehr/4.3.269

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Cohen, J.
Venue
Molecular Human Reproduction
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
269-280
ISSN
  • 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2407
OpenAlex
W2098405795
Cited by
343
References
2
FWCI
23.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ooplasmic transfer in mature human oocytes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molehr/4.3.269
The paper
Cohen, J. (1998). Ooplasmic transfer in mature human oocytes. Molecular Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/4.3.269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.