The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos
Abstract
Morphological assessments are the main way in which fertility clinics select in vitro generated embryo(s) for transfer to the uterus. However, it is widely acknowledged that the microscopic appearance of an embryo is only weakly correlated with its viability. Furthermore, the extent to which morphology is affected by aneuploidy, a genetic defect common in human preimplantation embryos, remains unclear. Aneuploidy is of great relevance to embryo selection as it represents one of the most important causes of implantation failure and miscarriage. The current study aimed to examine whether morphological appearance can assist in identifying embryos at risk of aneuploidy. Additionally, the data produced sheds light on how chromosomal anomalies impact development from the cleavage to the blastocyst stage. A total of 1213 embryos were examined. Comprehensive chromosome analysis was combined with well-established criteria for the assessment of embryo morphology. At the cleavage stage, chromosome abnormalities were common even amongst embryos assigned the best morphological scores, indicating that aneuploidy has little effect on microscopic appearance at fixed time points up until Day 3 of development. However, at the blastocyst stage aneuploidies were found to be significantly less common among embryos of optimal morphological quality, while such abnormalities were overrepresented amongst embryos considered to be of poor morphology. Despite the link between aneuploidy and blastocyst a…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Because rates of aneuploidy are known to be significantly higher at the cleavage stage compared to the blastocyst (18)”
From Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Braude, P., Bolton, V. N., & Moore, S. S. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/332459a0 · Cited by 1,462
Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem
Nagaoka, S. I., Hassold, T. J., & Hunt, P. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3245 · Cited by 1,036
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsøe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. A. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 918
Scott, R. T., Upham, K. M., Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Scott, K. L., Taylor, D. M., Tao, X., & Treff, N. R. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.04.035 · Cited by 589
Cummins, J. M., Breen, T. M., Harrison, K., Shaw, J., Wilson, L., & Hennessey, J. F. (1986) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01133388 · Cited by 561
Yang, Z., Liu, J., Collins, P. G. S., Salem, S. A., Liu, X., S-Lyle, S., Peck, A. C., Sills, E. S., & Salem, R. D. (2012) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/1755-8166-5-24 · Cited by 545
Characterization of a top quality embryo, a step towards single-embryo transfer
Royen, E. V., Mangel-Schots, K., Neubourg, D. D., Valkenburg, M. H., de Meerssche, M. V., Ryckaert, G., Eestermans, W., & Gerris, J. (1999) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/14.9.2345 · Cited by 507
Wells, D. (2000) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/6.11.1055 · Cited by 503
Self-citationIn vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Forman, E. J., Hong, K. H., Ferry, K. M., Tao, X., Taylor, D. M., Levy, B., Treff, N. R., & Scott, R. T. (2013) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.056 · Cited by 496
Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment
Puissant, F., Rysselberge, M. V., Barlow, P., Deweze, J., & Leroy, F. (1987) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136618 · Cited by 443
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- 1998, Nature; Physical Science (London), 332, 459
- 2013, RBM ONLINE, 26, 477
- 2012, RBM ONLINE, 25, 371
- 1998, JARG, 15, 297
- 2006, RBM ONLINE, 12, 234
- Puissant, 1987, Human Reproduction, 2, 705, 10.1093/humrep/ · DOI
- 2010, RBM ONLINE, 21, 118
- 2013, RBM ONLINE, 26, 120
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans
Taylor, T. H., Gitlin, S., Patrick, J. L., Crain, J. L., Wilson, J. M., & Griffin, D. K. (2014) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmu016 · Cited by 396
Minasi, M. G., Colasante, A., Riccio, T., Ruberti, A., Casciani, V., Scarselli, F., Spinella, F., Fiorentino, F., Varricchio, M. T., & Greco, E. (2016) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dew183 · Cited by 334
Mosaicism in health and disease — clones picking up speed
Forsberg, L. A., Gisselsson, D., & Dumanski, J. P. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.145 · Cited by 261
Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9–edited early human embryos
Alanis-Lobato, G., Zohren, J., McCarthy, A., Fogarty, N. M. E., Kubikova, N., Hardman, E., Greco, M., Wells, D., Turner, J. M. A., & Niakan, K. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2004832117 · Cited by 234
Self-citationGardner, D. K., & Balaban, B. (2016) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gaw057 · Cited by 234
Paternal factors contributing to embryo quality
Colaco, S., & Sakkas, D. (2018) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-018-1304-4 · Cited by 190
Cimadomo, D., Rienzi, L. F., Conforti, A., Forman, E. J., Canosa, S., Innocenti, F., Poli, M., Hynes, J. S., Gemmell, L. C., Vaiarelli, A., et al. (2023) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmad010 · Cited by 156
Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts
Lagalla, C., Tarozzi, N., Sciajno, R., Wells, D., Santo, M., Nadalini, M., Distratis, V., & Borini, A. (2016) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008 · Cited by 147
Self-citationRavichandran, K., McCaffrey, C., GRIFO, J. A., Morales, A. J., Perloe, M., Munné, S., Wells, D., & Fragouli, E. (2017) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dex070 · Cited by 123
Self-citationFragouli, E., Munné, S., & Wells, D. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy036 · Cited by 120
Self-citationShould we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Maheshwari, A., Hamilton, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2015) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.09.016 · Cited by 119
Stigliani, S., Persico, L., Lagazio, C., Anserini, P., Venturini, P. L., & Scaruffi, P. (2014) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gau086 · Cited by 103
Morphological and morphokinetic associations with aneuploidy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bamford, T., Barrie, A., Montgomery, S., Dhillon‐Smith, R. K., Campbell, A., Easter, C., & Coomarasamy, A. (2022) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmac022 · Cited by 98
Type of chromosome abnormality affects embryo morphology dynamics
Nogales, M. D. C., Bronet, F., Basile, N., Martínez, E. M. G., Liñán, A., Rodrigo, L., & Meseguer, M. (2016) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.019 · Cited by 84
García-Ferreyra, J., Luna, D., Villegas, L., Romero, R. G., Zavala, P., Hilario, R., & Dueñas-Chacón, J. (2015) · Clinical Medicine Insights Reproductive Health · doi:10.4137/cmrh.s32769 · Cited by 78
Greco, E., Bono, S., Ruberti, A., Lobascio, A. M., Greco, P., Biricik, A., Spizzichino, L., Greco, A., Tesařík, J., Minasi, M. G., et al. (2014) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2014/457913 · Cited by 72
Santos, M. J. D. L., Juan, A. D., Mifsud, A., Mercader, A., Meseguer, M., Rubio, C., & Pellicer, A. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.022 · Cited by 72
Cleavage pattern predicts developmental potential of day 3 human embryos produced by IVF
Yang, S., Shi, J., Gong, F., Zhang, S. P., Lu, C. F., Tan, K., Leng, L., Hao, M., He, H., Gu, Y., et al. (2015) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.02.008 · Cited by 70
Human embryo mosaicism: did we drop the ball on chromosomal testing?
Esfandiari, N., Bunnell, M. E., & Casper, R. F. (2016) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0797-y · Cited by 69
Magli, M. C., Albanese, C., Crippa, A., Tabanelli, C., Ferraretti, A. P., & Gianaroli, L. (2018) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.09.016 · Cited by 68
Barkalina, N., Jones, C., Wood, M. J. A., & Coward, K. (2015) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv027 · Cited by 63
Majumdar, G., Majumdar, A., Verma, I. C., & Upadhyaya, K. C. (2017) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.4103/0974-1208.204013 · Cited by 63
Zhan, Q., Sierra, E., Malmsten, J. E., Ye, Z., Rosenwaks, Z., & Zaninović, N. (2020) · F&S Reports · doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2020.05.004 · Cited by 61
Lagalla, C., Coticchio, G., Sciajno, R., Tarozzi, N., Zacà, C., & Borini, A. (2019) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.011 · Cited by 52
Barash, O. O., Ivani, K. A., Willman, S. P., Rosenbluth, E. M., Wachs, D. S., Hinckley, M. D., Pittenger, S. R., & Weckstein, L. N. (2017) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-017-0944-0 · Cited by 50
Recent advances in preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening
Lu, L., Lv, B., Huang, K. Y., Xue, Z., Zhu, X., & Fan, G. (2016) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-016-0750-0 · Cited by 50
Abnormal cleavage and developmental arrest of human preimplantation embryos in vitro
McCollin, A., Swann, R. L., Summers, M. C., Handyside, A. H., & Ottolini, C. S. (2019) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.04.008 · Cited by 46
Oocyte quality and embryo selection strategies: a review for the embryologists, by the embryologists
Anagnostopoulou, C., Rosas, I. M., SINGH, N., GUGNANI, N., CHOCKALINGHAM, A., SINGH, K., DESAI, D., Darbandi, M., MANOHARAN, M., Darbandi, S., et al. (2022) · Panminerva Medica · doi:10.23736/s0031-0808.22.04680-8 · Cited by 45
Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology
Wang, A., Kort, J., Behr, B. R., & Westphal, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-018-1262-x · Cited by 44
Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts
Sciorio, R., Thong, K. J., & Pickering, S. J. (2019) · Zygote · doi:10.1017/s0967199419000273 · Cited by 42
García-Ferreyra, J., Hilario, R., & Dueñas, J. (2018) · JBRA · doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180004 · Cited by 41
Tarozzi, N., Nadalini, M., Lagalla, C., Coticchio, G., Zacà, C., & Borini, A. (2019) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01584-w · Cited by 40
The paternal toolbox for embryo development and health
Tarozzi, N., Nadalini, M., Coticchio, G., Zacà, C., Lagalla, C., & Borini, A. (2021) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gaab042 · Cited by 40
Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
Kirillova, A., Lysenkov, S. N., Farmakovskaya, M., Kiseleva, Y., Martazanova, B., Mishieva, N., Abubakirov, A., & Sukhikh, G. T. (2020) · Fertility Research and Practice · doi:10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5 · Cited by 39
Herbemont, C., Sarandi, S., Boujenah, J., Cédrin‐Durnerin, I., Sermondade, N., Vivot, A., Poncelet, C., Grynberg, M., & Sifer, C. (2017) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.014 · Cited by 39
Elective single blastocyst transfer in advanced maternal age
Tannus, S., Son, W., & Dahan, M. H. (2017) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-017-0906-6 · Cited by 38
Łukaszuk, K., Pukszta, S., Wells, D., Cybulska, C., Liss, J., Płóciennik, Ł., Kuczyński, W., & Zabielska, J. (2015) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.123 · Cited by 37
Self-citationLacconi, V., Massimiani, M., Carriero, I., Bianco, C., Ticconi, C., Pavone, V., Alteri, A., Muzii, L., Rago, R., Pisaturo, V., et al. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25052834 · Cited by 36
Levi-Setti, P. E., Cirillo, F., Smeraldi, A., Morenghi, E., Mulazzani, G., & Albani, E. (2017) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1092-2 · Cited by 36
Deep learning neural network analysis of human blastocyst expansion from time-lapse image files
Huang, T., Kosasa, T. S., Walker, B., Arnett, C., Huang, C. T. F., Yin, C., Harun, M. Y., Ahn, H. J., & Ohta, A. T. (2021) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.02.015 · Cited by 36
Blasts from the past: is morphology useful in PGT-A tested and untested frozen embryo transfers?
Shear, M. A., Vaughan, D. A., Modest, A. M., Seidler, E. A., Leung, A. Q., Hacker, M. R., Sakkas, D., & Penzias, A. S. (2020) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.07.014 · Cited by 35
Comparison of gender-specific human embryo development characteristics by time-lapse technology
Serdarogullari, M., Fındıklı, N., Göktaş, C., ŞAHİN, O., Uluğ, U., Yağmur, E., & Bahçeci, M. (2014) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.03.026 · Cited by 34
Novel embryo selection techniques to increase embryo implantation in IVF attempts
Sigalos, G. Α., Triantafyllidou, O., & Vlahos, N. (2016) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-016-4196-5 · Cited by 33
Tutt, D. A. R., Silvestri, G., Albal, M. S., Simmons, R. J., Kwong, W. Y., Guven-Ates, G., Canedo‐Ribeiro, C., Labrecque, R., Blondin, P., Handyside, A. H., et al. (2020) · Theriogenology · doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.11.021 · Cited by 33
Morales, C. (2023) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-023-01301-0 · Cited by 32
Collins, S. C., Xu, X. J., & Mak, W. (2017) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1001-8 · Cited by 35
Marchetti, F., Massarotti, A., Yauk, C. L., Pacchierotti, F., & Russo, A. (2015) · Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis · doi:10.1002/em.21986 · Cited by 32
Kim, M. K., Park, J. K., Jeon, Y., Choe, S., Lee, H. J., Kim, J., Chang, E. M., Kim, J. W., Lyu, S. W., Kim, J. Y., et al. (2019) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e27 · Cited by 31
Li, Y., Wang, J., Sun, T., Lv, M., Ge, P., Li, H., & Zhou, D. (2020) · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · doi:10.1111/jog.14188 · Cited by 31
Brooks, K. E., Daughtry, B. L., Davis, B. A., Yan, M. Y., Fei, S. S., Shepherd, S., Carbone, L., & Chavez, S. L. (2022) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.198341 · Cited by 35
Papler, T. B., Bokal, E. V., Lovrečić, L., Kopitar, A. N., & Maver, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115865 · Cited by 30
Trisomy 21 and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A review
Sánchez-Pavón, E., Mendoza, H., & García-Ferreyra, J. (2021) · JBRA · doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20210047 · Cited by 32
Luna, D., Hilario, R., Dueñas-Chacón, J., Romero, R. G., Zavala, P., Villegas, L., & García-Ferreyra, J. (2015) · Clinical Medicine Insights Reproductive Health · doi:10.4137/cmrh.s33032 · Cited by 29
Kimelman, D., Confino, R., Okeigwe, I., Lambe-Steinmiller, J., Confino, E., SHULMAN, L. P., Zhang, J. X., & Pavone, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01501-1 · Cited by 28
Comparison of day 5 blastocyst with day 6 blastocyst: Evidence from NGS-based PGT-A results
Tong, J., Niu, Y., Wan, A., & Zhang, T. (2022) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-022-02397-0 · Cited by 27
Yang, H., Liu, Y., Niu, W., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Jin, H.-X., & Li, G. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.1072176 · Cited by 27
Huo, P., Zhu, Y., Liang, C.-Q., Yao, J., Le, J., Qin, L., Lei, X., & Zhang, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2020.00405 · Cited by 24
Extended embryo culture is effective for patients of an advanced maternal age
Sainte-Rose, R., Petit, C., Dijols, L., Frapsauce, C., & Guérif, F. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92902-9 · Cited by 24
Karoii, D. H., Azizi, H., & Skutella, T. (2024) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-024-10506-9 · Cited by 24
Time-lapse embryo imaging technology
Fındıklı, N., & Oral, E. (2014) · Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/gco.0000000000000072 · Cited by 24
Bellver, J., Bosch, E., Espinós, J. J., Fábregues, F., Fontes, J., García-Velasco, J. A., Llácer, J., Requena, A., & Checa, M. Á. (2019) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.07.037 · Cited by 23
Current knowledge and the future potential of extracellular vesicles in mammalian reproduction
Tesfaye, D., Menjivar, N. G., & Gebremedhn, S. (2021) · Reproduction Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd21277 · Cited by 25
Does slow embryo development predict a high aneuploidy rate on trophectoderm biopsy?
Piccolomini, M. M., Nicolielo, M., Bonetti, T. C., Motta, E. L. A., Serafini, P. C., & Alegretti, J. R. (2016) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.06.005 · Cited by 23
Beyer, C. E., & Willats, E. (2017) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1009-0 · Cited by 23
Irani, M., Zaninović, N., Canon, C. M., O’Neill, C. L., Gunnala, V., Zhan, Q., Palermo, G. D., Reichman, D., & Rosenwaks, Z. (2018) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dey053 · Cited by 23
Tvrdonova, K., Bělašková, S., Rumpíková, T., Malenovská, A., Rumpík, D., Fucikova, A. M., & Malíř, F. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10215173 · Cited by 22
Transferring two grades I cleavage-stage embryo might not be a good protocol
Li, M., Wang, H., Ma, C., & Shi, J. (2017) · Gynecological Endocrinology · doi:10.1080/09513590.2017.1302420 · Cited by 22
Wang, J., Li, D., Xu, Z., Diao, Z., Zhou, J., Lin, F., & Zhang, N. (2019) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/s13039-019-0423-7 · Cited by 22
Girardi, L. D. C., Patassini, C., Miravet-Valenciano, J., Sato, Y., Cagnin, N. F., Castellón, J. A., Cogo, F., Zambon, P., Blesa, D., Almazán, J. J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-024-03278-4 · Cited by 21
Genome‐wide abnormalities in embryos: Origins and clinical consequences
Masset, H., Tšuiko, O., & Vermeesch, J. R. (2021) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.5895 · Cited by 21
Pacchierotti, F., Masumura, K., Eastmond, D. A., Elhajouji, A., Frötschl, R., Kirsch‐Volders, M., Lynch, A. M., Schuler, M., Tweats, D. J., & Marchetti, F. (2019) · Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis · doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.02.004 · Cited by 22
Jiang, V. S., Kandula, H., Thirumalaraju, P., Kanakasabapathy, M. K., Cherouveim, P., Souter, I. C., Dimitriadis, I., Bormann, C. L., & Shafiee, H. (2023) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-022-02707-6 · Cited by 20
Borgstrøm, M. B., Grøndahl, M. L., Klausen, T. W., Danielsen, A. K., Thomsen, T., Gabrielsen, A. V., Zedeler, A., Povlsen, B. B., Hnida, C., Almind, G. J., et al. (2020) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1432 · Cited by 19
Borgstrøm, M. B., Kesmodel, U. S., Klausen, T. W., Danielsen, A. K., Thomsen, T., Gabrielsen, A. V., Englund, A. L. M., Zedeler, A., Povlsen, B. B., Troest, B., et al. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab242 · Cited by 19
Kato, K., Kuroda, T., Yamadera, R., Ezoe, K., Aoyama, N., Usami, A., Miki, T., Yamamoto, T., & Takeshita, T. (2022) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-022-01073-z · Cited by 21
Derrick, R., Hickman, C. F. L., Oliana, O., Wilkinson, T., Gwinnett, D., Whyte, L. B., Carby, A., & Lavery, S. A. (2017) · Reproductive BioMedicine Online · doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.08.026 · Cited by 19
Huang, Y., Ha, S., Li, Z., Li, J., & Xiao, W. (2019) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.04.037 · Cited by 19
Nørgård, B. M., Wod, M., Larsen, M. D., Friedman, S., Jølving, L. R., & Fedder, J. (2021) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1198 · Cited by 18
The clinical outcomes of day 3 4-cell embryos after extended in vitro culture
Zhao, P., Li, M., Lian, Y., Zheng, X., Liu, P., & Qiao, J. (2014) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-014-0361-6 · Cited by 18
Fesahat, F., Kalantar, S. M., Sheikhha, M. H., Saeedi, H., Montazeri, F., Firouzabadi, R. D., & Khalili, M. A. (2017) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.12.006 · Cited by 18
de Martin, H., Bonetti, T. C., Nissel, C. A. Z., Gomes, A. P., Fujii, M. G., & Monteleone, P. A. A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-51087-z · Cited by 17
Chen, C.-H., Lee, C., Huang, C., Chen, H.-H., Ho, S.-T., Cheng, E., Lin, P., Chen, C.-I., Lee, T., & Lee, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.783826 · Cited by 16
Kij-Mitka, B., Kochan, J., Nowak, A., Niżański, W., Prochowska, S., Fryc, K., & Bugno‐Poniewierska, M. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10010003 · Cited by 16
Toft, C. L. F., Ingerslev, H. J., Kesmodel, U. S., Diemer, T., Degn, B., Ernst, A., Okkels, H., Kjartansdóttir, K. R., & Pedersen, I. S. (2020) · Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/aogs.13823 · Cited by 16
Huang, J., Li, R., Zeng, L., Hu, L., Shi, J., Cai, L., Yao, B., Wang, X., Xu, Y., Yao, Y., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057254 · Cited by 15
Population monitoring of trisomy 21: problems and approaches
Sperling, K., Scherb, H., & Neitzel, H. (2023) · Molecular Cytogenetics · doi:10.1186/s13039-023-00637-1 · Cited by 14
Ping, P., Liu, Y., Zheng, Z., Ma, Y., Dong, F., & Chen, X. (2023) · Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · doi:10.1007/s00404-023-07098-2 · Cited by 17
Wang, X., Tian, P.-Z., Zhao, Y., Lü, J., Dong, C.-Y., & Zhang, C. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-70249-1 · Cited by 13
Can trophectoderm morphology act as a predictor for euploidy?
Yoshida, I. H., Santos, M. C., Berton, C. Z., Chiarella, C. L., Tanada, M. S., Cordts, E. B., de Carvalho, W. P., & Barbosa, C. P. (2018) · JBRA · doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20180036 · Cited by 13
Xie, Q., Jiang, W., Ji, H., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Zhao, C. L., Zhang, J., Lu, J., & Ling, X. (2022) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.001 · Cited by 12
Christensen, M. W., Keefe, D. L., Wang, F., Hansen, C. S., Chamani, I. J., Sommer, C., Nyegaard, M., Rohde, P. D., Nielsen, A. L., Bybjerg‐Grauholm, J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02326-7 · Cited by 10
Sayed, G. A., Al‐Sawaf, H. A., Al-Sawaf, A. H., Saeid, M., Maged, A. M., & Ibrahim, I. H. (2021) · Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2147/pgpm.s284064 · Cited by 11
The role of frozen–thawed embryo replacement cycles in assisted conception
Noble, M., & Child, T. J. (2019) · The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist · doi:10.1111/tog.12630 · Cited by 11
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Quality Assurance in ART: A Review
Khan, H. L., Khan, S., Bhatti, S., & Abbas, S. (2022) · Fertility & Reproduction · doi:10.1142/s2661318223300015 · Cited by 10
Towards the selection of embryos with the greatest implantation potential
Khalife, D., Abu-Musa, A. A., Khalil, A., & Ghazeeri, G. S. (2021) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1080/01443615.2020.1835842 · Cited by 10
Yin, B., Li, S., Sun, L., Yao, Z., Cui, Y., Zhang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1302194 · Cited by 9
Segmental duplications and monosomies are linked to in vitro developmental arrest
Munck, N. D., Bayram, A., Elkhatib, I., Liñán, A., Arnanz, A., Melado, L., Lawrenz, B., & Fatemi, M. H. (2021) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02147-8 · Cited by 9
Liu, Y.-L., Yu, T.-N., Wang, P., Tzeng, C., Chen, C.-H., & Chen, C. (2020) · Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.tjog.2020.05.005 · Cited by 9
Liu, X., Zhang, C., Huang, J., Liu, H., Li, B., Zhang, F., & Xu, C. (2024) · Clinica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.cca.2024.117860 · Cited by 8
Hori, K. S., Hori, K., Kosasa, T. S., Walker, B., Ohta, A. T., Ahn, H. J., & Huang, T. (2023) · Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10815-023-02797-w · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., & Wells, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fragouli, E.
- Venue
- Molecular Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-11-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-126
- ISSN
- 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2407
- OpenAlex
- W2142766753
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8
- FWCI
- 9.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Keywords
- embryo morphology, aneuploidy, preimplantation embryo, cleavage stage, blastocyst, embryo selection, chromosomal abnormalities, Down syndrome, sex ratio, embryo growth rate, implantation failure
- MeSH terms
- Aneuploidy, Blastocyst, Chromosomes, Human, Embryo Transfer, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Male, Microscopy, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Research Design, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Cytogenetic Analysis, Comparative Genomic Hybridization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review