The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes
Open accessAbstract
Fundamental to many bacterial genome mapping strategies currently under development is the need to cleave the genome into a few large DNA fragments that can be resolved by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Identification of endonucleases that infrequently cut a genome is of key importance in this process. We show that the tetranucleotide CTAG is extremely rare in most bacterial genomes with G+C contents above 45%. As a consequence, most of the sixteen bacterial genomes we have tested are cleaved less than once every 100,000 base pairs by one or more endonucleases that have CTAG in their recognition sequences: Xba I (TCTAGA), Spe I (ACTAGT), Avr II (CCTAGG) and Nhe I (GCTAGC). Similarly, CCG and CGG are the rarest trinucleotides in many genomes with G+C content of less than 45%. Thus, Sma I (CCCGGG), Rsr II (CGGWCCG), Nae I (GCCGGC) and Sac II (CCGCGG) are often suitable endonucleases for producing fragments that average over 100,000 base pairs from such genomes. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis of the fragments that result from cleavage with endonucleases that cleave only a few times per genome should assist in the physical mapping of many prokaryotic genomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis
Schwartz, D. C., & Cantor, C. R. (1984) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(84)90301-5 · Cited by 2,841
TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS IN PROKARYOTES
Kleckner, N. (1981) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.15.120181.002013 · Cited by 754
The Determination of Molecular Weight of Bacterial Genome DNA from Renaturation Rates
Gillis, M., Ley, J. D., & Cleene, M. D. (1970) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb00831.x · Cited by 431
Shepherd, J. C. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.3.1596 · Cited by 316
Gardiner, K., Laas, W., & Patterson, D. (1986) · Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01560665 · Cited by 281
DNA methylation in thermophilic bacteria: N4-methylcytosine, 5-methylcytosine, and N5methyladenine
Ehrlich, M., Gama-Sosa, M. A., Carreira, L. H., et al. (1985) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/13.4.1399 · Cited by 140
Wallace, D. C., & Morowitz, H. J. (1972) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/bf00321457 · Cited by 91
Phillips, G. J., Arnold, J., & IVARIE, R. D. (1987) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/15.6.2627 · Cited by 66
Cited by
Palleroni, N. J. (2015) · Bergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · doi:10.1002/9781118960608.gbm01210 · Cited by 85
Villani, F., Moschetti, G., Blaiotta, G., & Coppola, S. (1997) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03588.x · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- McClelland, M., Jones, R., Patel, Y., & Nelson, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5985-6005
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2025982370
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/15.15.5985
- The paper
- McClelland, M., Jones, R., Patel, Y., & Nelson, M. (1987). Restriction endonucleases for pulsed field mapping of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/15.15.5985
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.