CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 65Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of strains of Leuconostoc mesenteroides by analysis of soluble whole-cell protein pattern, DNA fingerprinting and restriction of ribosomal DNA

Villani, F., Moschetti, G., Blaiotta, G., Coppola, S.·1997·Journal of Applied Microbiology
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03588.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Of 215 leuconostocs isolated from field grass, natural whey cultures and water-buffalo milk, 178 were identified as Leuconostoc mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides while 37 strains could not be identified. Biochemical characterization allowed seven groups to be defined. Representative strains of each group and different habitat and nine reference strains were selected for further analyses. Protein profiles appeared suitable for species discrimination, but did not differentiate between the three subspecies of Leuc. mesenteroides. The technique also showed some differences among equivocal strains. DNA fingerprinting for most strains of Leuc. mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides examined showed a different restriction pattern from that of the type strain. Ribotyping was not useful for discriminating species and subspecies of the genus Leuconostoc: Leuc. mesenteroides ssp. mesenteroides and ssp. dextranicum showed the same ribopattern as Leuc. lactis while Leuc. mesenteroides ssp. cremoris exhibited a pattern distinct from all the other species examined. On the basis of ARDRA-PCR, two main groups could be distinguished: the larger group included Leuc. mesenteroides, Leuc. lactis, Leuc. pseudomesenteroides and some unidentifiable strains; the second one included Leuc. citreum, Leuc. fallax, Weissella paramesenteroides and some unidentified strains.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03588.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Leuconostoc are heterofermentative and produce D-lactate, ethanol, CO2, and small amounts of acetate from glucose metabolism via the phosphoketolase pathway.

    “They are heterofermentative and produce D-lactate, ethanol, CO2, and small amounts of acetate from glucose metabolism via the phosphoketolase pathway [41,43,66,90,93].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheeses: From Starter Cultures to Probiotic Functions (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

  • Certain Leuconostoc strains produce diacetyl and acetoin from citrate, contributing to the typical aroma and flavor of dairy products.

    “Certain strains also produce diacetyl and acetoin from citrate, contributing to the typical aroma and flavor of dairy products [88,91,93].”

    From Lactic Acid Bacteria in Raw-Milk Cheeses: From Starter Cultures to Probiotic Functions (2022) · cites this paper as [93]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Garvie, 1981, Sub-division within the genus Leuconostoc as shown by RNA-DNA-hybridization, Journal of General Microbiology, 127, 209
  2. Harrigan, 1976, Laboratory Methods in Dairy and Food Microbiology, 320
  3. Holzapfel, 1992, The Prokaryotes, 2, 1508
  4. Mayeux, 1962, A selected medium for detecting leuconostoc organisms in mixed strains starter cultures, Journal of Dairy Science, 45, 655
  5. Moschetti, 1995, Characterization of dairy enterococci by restriction endonuclease and rDNA fingerprinting, Annali di Microbiogia ed Enzimologia, 45, 1
  6. Krush, 1982, Schnellest zum qualitativen Nachweis von L (+) und D (-) Milchsaure fur die Bestimmung von Milchesaurebakterien, Milchwissenschaft, 37, 65

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Villani, F., Moschetti, G., Blaiotta, G., & Coppola, S.
Affiliations
University of Naples Federico II (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1997-05
Volume
82
Issue
5
Pages
578-588
ISSN
1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03588.x
OpenAlex
W2057807906
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
Leuconostoc mesenteroides, strain characterization, whole-cell protein patterns, DNA fingerprinting, ribotyping, species discrimination, Leuconostoc lactis, Leuconostoc citreum, Leuconostoc fallax, Leuconostoc dextranicum, Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides, buffalo milk, lactic acid bacteria
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacterial Proteins, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Leuconostoc, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, RNA, Ribosomal, 23S, Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate, Solubility, Restriction Mapping, Deoxyribonuclease HindIII, DNA Fingerprinting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review