The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes
Open accessAbstract
Comparison of homologous genes is a major step for many studies related to genome structure, function or evolution. Similarity search programs easily find genes homologous to a given sequence. However, only very tedious manual procedures allow the retrieval of all sets of homologous genes sequenced for a given set of species. Moreover, this search often generates errors due to the complexity of data to be managed simultaneously: phylogenetic trees, alignments, taxonomy, sequences and related information. HOVERGEN helps to solve these problems by integrating all this information. HOVERGEN corresponds to GenBank sequences from all vertebrate species, with some data corrected, clarified, or completed, notably to address the problem of redundancy. Coding sequences have been classified in gene families. Protein multiple alignments and phylogenetic trees have been calculated for each family. Sequences and related information have been structured in an ACNUC database which permits complex selections. A graphical interface has been developed to visualize and edit trees. Genes are displayed in color, according to their taxonomy. Users have directly access to all information attached to sequences and to multiple alignments simply by clicking on genes. This graphical tool gives thus a rapid and simple access to all data necessary to interpret homology relationships between genes. HOVERGEN allows the user to easily select sets of homologous vertebrate genes, and thus is particularly useful for comparative sequence analysis, or molecular evolution studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The essentials of DNA methylation
Bird, A. (1992) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(92)90526-i · Cited by 948
CpG islands as gene markers in the human genome
Larsen, F., Gundersen, G., Lopez, R., & Prydz, H. (1992) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/0888-7543(92)90024-m · Cited by 922
Duret, L., Dorkeld, F., & Gautier, C. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.10.2315 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Cited by
A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution
Kumar, S., & Hedges, S. B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31927 · Cited by 1,936
Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics
Koonin, E. V. (2005) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · Cited by 1,323
High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids
Eyre-Walker, A., & Keightley, P. D. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/16915 · Cited by 398
Nei, M., Xu, P., & Glazko, G. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.051611498 · Cited by 329
Gene Expression Intensity Shapes Evolutionary Rates of the Proteins Encoded by the Vertebrate Genome
Subramanian, S., & Kumar, S. (2004) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.104.028944 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Duret, L., Mouchiroud, D., & Gouy, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2360-2365
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W1966786019
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/22.12.2360
- The paper
- Duret, L., Mouchiroud, D., & Gouy, M. (1994). HOVERGEN: a database of homologous vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.12.2360
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.