The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases
Open accessAbstract
Synonymous codon usage varies considerably among Caenorhabditis elegans genes. Multivariate statistical analyses reveal a single major trend among genes. At one end of the trend lie genes with relatively unbiased codon usage. These genes appear to be lowly expressed, and their patterns of codon usage are consistent with mutational biases influenced by the neighbouring nucleotide. At the other extreme lie genes with extremely biased codon usage. These genes appear to be highly expressed, and their codon usage seems to have been shaped by selection favouring a limited number of translationally optimal codons. Thus, the frequency of these optimal codons in a gene appears to be correlated with the level of gene expression, and may be a useful indicator in the case of genes (or open reading frames) whose expression levels (or even function) are unknown. A second, relatively minor trend among genes is correlated with the frequency of G at synonymously variable sites. It is not yet clear whether this trend reflects variation in base composition (or mutational biases) among regions of the C.elegans genome, or some other factor. Sequence divergence between C.elegans and C.briggsae has also been studied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McVean, G. A. T., & Charlesworth, B. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.929 · Cited by 336
Gu, W., Zhou, T., & Wilke, C. O. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000664 · Cited by 313
Pattern of selective constraint in C. elegans and C. briggsae genomes
SHABALINA, S. A., & KONDRASHOV, A. S. (1999) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672399003821 · Cited by 94
(2023) · doi:10.1002/pro.4576 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Stenico, M., Lloyd, A. T., & Sharp, P. M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2437-2446
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2080731394
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/22.13.2437
- The paper
- Stenico, M., Lloyd, A. T., & Sharp, P. M. (1994). Codon usage in Caenorhabditis elegans: delineation of translational selection and mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.13.2437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.