The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes
Open accessAbstract
Analysis of a newly sequenced bacterial genome starts with identification of protein-coding genes. Functional assignment of proteins requires the exact knowledge of protein N-termini. We present a new program ORPHEUS that identifies candidate genes and accurately predicts gene starts. The analysis starts with a database similarity search and identification of reliable gene fragments. The latter are used to derive statistical characteristics of protein-coding regions and ribosome-binding sites and to predict the complete set of genes in the analyzed genome. In a test on Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli genomes, the program correctly identified 93.3% (resp. 96.3%) of experimentally annotated genes longer than 100 codons described in the PIR-International database, and for these genes 96.3% (83.9%) of starts were predicted exactly. Furthermore, 98.9% (99.1%) of genes longer than 100 codons annotated in GenBank were found, and 92.9% (75.7%) of predicted starts coincided with the feature table description. Finally, for the complete gene complements of B.subtilis and E.coli , including genes shorter than 100 codons, gene prediction accuracy was 88.9 and 87.1%, respectively, with 94.2 and 76.7% starts coinciding with the existing annotation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
The N-end rule: functions, mysteries, uses
Varshavsky, A. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.22.12142 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm
Lomsadze, A. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki937 · Cited by 975
Stinear, T. P., Seemann, T., Harrison, P. F., Jenkin, G. A., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Abdellah, Z., Arrowsmith, C., Chillingworth, T., Churcher, C., et al. (2008) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.075069.107 · Cited by 570
A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics
Kunin, V., Copeland, A., Lapidus, A., Mavromatis, K., & Hugenholtz, P. (2008) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00009-08 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Frishman, D., Mironov, A., Mewes, H.-W., & Gelfand, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2941-2947
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2091560728
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/26.12.2941
- The paper
- Frishman, D., Mironov, A., Mewes, H.-W., & Gelfand, M. (1998). Combining diverse evidence for gene recognition in completely sequenced bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.12.2941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.