The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality
Open accessAbstract
DNA bending in 86 complexes with sequence-specific proteins has been examined using normal vector plots, matrices of normal vector angles between all base pairs in the helix, and one-digit roll/slide/twist tables. FREEHELIX, a new program especially designed to analyze severely bent and kinked duplexes, generates the foregoing quantities plus local roll, tilt, twist, slide, shift and rise parameters that are completely free of any assumptions about an overall helix axis. In nearly every case, bending results from positive roll at pyrimidine-purine base pair steps: C-A (= T-G), T-A, or less frequently C-G, in a direction that compresses the major groove. Normal vector plots reveal three well-defined types of bending among the 86 examples: (i) localized kinks produced by positive roll at one or two discrete base pairs steps, (ii) three-dimensional writhe resulting from positive roll at a series of adjacent base pairs steps, or (iii) continuous curvature produced by alternations of positive and negative roll every 5 bp, with side-to-side zig-zag roll at intermediate position. In no case is tilt a significant component of the bending process. In sequences with two localized kinks, such as CAP and IHF, the dihedral angle formed by the three helix segments is a linear function of the number of base pair steps between kinks: dihedral angle = 36 degrees x kink separation. Twenty-eight of the 86 examples can be described as major bends, and significant elements in the recognition of a given base sequence by protein. But even the minor bends play a role in fine-tuning protein/DNA interactions. Sequence-dependent helix deformability is an important component of protein/DNA recognition, alongside the more generally recognized patterns of hydrogen bonding. The combination of FREEHELIX, normal vector plots, full vector angle matrices, and one-digit roll/slide/twist tables affords a rapid and convenient method for assessing bending in DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What is Bioinformatics? A Proposed Definition and Overview of the Field
Luscombe, N. M., Greenbaum, D., & Gerstein, M. (2001) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1634431 · Cited by 453
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Kitayner, M., Rozenberg, H., Kessler, N., Rabinovich, D., Shaulov, L., Haran, T. E., & Shakked, Z. (2006) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.015 · Cited by 408
Fujii, Y., Shimizu, T., Kusumoto, M., Kyogoku, Y., Taniguchi, T., & Hakoshima, T. (1999) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/18.18.5028 · Cited by 223
Base Coupling in Sequence-specific Site Recognition by the ETS Domain of Murine PU.1
Poon, G. M. K., & Macgregor, R. B. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(03)00362-0 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickerson, R.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-04-15
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1906-1926
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2139064328
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/26.8.1906
- The paper
- Dickerson, R. (1998). DNA bending: the prevalence of kinkiness and the virtues of normality. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/26.8.1906
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.