The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
Open accessAbstract
KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) is a knowledge base for systematic analysis of gene functions, linking genomic information with higher order functional information. The genomic information is stored in the GENES database, which is a collection of gene catalogs for all the completely sequenced genomes and some partial genomes with up-to-date annotation of gene functions. The higher order functional information is stored in the PATHWAY database, which contains graphical representations of cellular processes, such as metabolism, membrane transport, signal transduction and cell cycle. The PATHWAY database is supplemented by a set of ortholog group tables for the information about conserved subpathways (pathway motifs), which are often encoded by positionally coupled genes on the chromosome and which are especially useful in predicting gene functions. A third database in KEGG is LIGAND for the information about chemical compounds, enzyme molecules and enzymatic reactions. KEGG provides Java graphics tools for browsing genome maps, comparing two genome maps and manipulating expression maps, as well as computational tools for sequence comparison, graph comparison and path computation. The KEGG databases are daily updated and made freely available (http://www. genome.ad.jp/kegg/).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Pfam composition 54 , Gene Ontology 51 and KEGG 52,53 were used to further validate P. bachei orthologues.”
From The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems (2014) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kanehisa, M. I. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198503279.001.0001 · Cited by 157
Self-citationDBGET/LinkDB: an integrated database retrieval system.
Fujibuchi, W., Goto, S., Migimatsu, H., et al. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 109
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND
Buchfink, B., Xie, C., & Huson, D. H. (2015) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.3176 · Cited by 14,201
Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets
Zhou, Y., Zhou, B., Pache, L., Chang, M., Khodabakhshi, A. H., Tanaseichuk, O., Benner, C., & Chanda, S. K. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6 · Cited by 14,611
Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update
Kuleshov, M. V., Jones, M. R., Rouillard, A. D., Fernandez, N. F., Duan, Q., Wang, Z., Koplev, S., Jenkins, S. L., Jagodnik, K. M., Lachmann, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw377 · Cited by 10,799
Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome
David, L. A., Maurice, C. F., Carmody, R. N., Gootenberg, D. B., Button, J. E., Wolfe, B. E., Ling, A. V., Devlin, A. S., Varma, Y., Fischbach, M. A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12820 · Cited by 10,100
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Hosack, D. A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 · Cited by 9,327
Metadata
- Authors
- Kanehisa, M.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kanehisa, M.
- ORCID
- Kanehisa, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-30
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- PMC
- PMC102409
- OpenAlex
- W4294216483
- Cited by
- 37,077
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3223 · 2025: 4679 · 2024: 4901 · 2023: 4461 · 2022: 4132 · 2021: 3288 · 2020: 2270 · 2019: 1699 · 2018: 1295 · 2017: 1242 · 2016: 1160 · 2015: 1008 · 2014: 729 · 2013: 600 · 2012: 519
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Keywords
- KEGG, gene function annotation, metabolic pathways, orthogroups, gene function prediction, chemical compounds, enzymatic reactions, genome annotation, sequence comparison, graph comparison, path computation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Japan, Proteins, Gene Expression, Databases, Factual, Information Storage and Retrieval, Genome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
