The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals
Open accessAbstract
The efficiency of reinitiation in mammalian translation systems depends in part on the size and arrangement of upstream open reading frames (upORFs). The gradual decrease in reinitiation as an upORF is lengthened, confirmed here using a variety of sequences, might reflect time-dependent loss of protein factors required for reinitiation. Consistent with the idea that the duration of elongation is what matters, reinitiation was nearly abolished when a pseudoknot that causes a pause in elongation was inserted into a short upORF. Control experiments showed that this transient pause in elongation had little effect on the final protein yield when the pseudoknot was moved from the upORF into the main ORF. Thus, the deleterious effect of slowing elongation is limited to the reinitiation mode. Another aspect of reinitiation investigated here is whether post-termination ribosomes can scan backwards to initiate at AUG codons positioned upstream from the terminator codon. Earlier studies that raised this possibility may have been complicated by the occurrence of leaky scanning along with reinitiation. Re-examination of the question, using constructs that preclude leaky scanning, shows barely detectable reinitiation from an AUG codon positioned 4 nt upstream from the terminator codon and no detectable reinitiation from an AUG codon positioned farther upstream. These experiments carried out with synthetic transcripts help to define the circumstances under which reinitiation may be expected to occur in the growing number of natural mRNAs that deviate from the simple first AUG rule.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kozak, M. (1986) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(86)90762-2 · Cited by 4,741
Self-citationUpstream Open Reading Frames as Regulators of mRNA Translation
Morris, D. R., & Geballe, A. P. (2000) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.20.23.8635-8642.2000 · Cited by 736
Kozak, M. (1994) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80019-1 · Cited by 101
Self-citation
Cited by
The mechanism of eukaryotic translation initiation and principles of its regulation
Jackson, R. J., Hellen, C. U. T., & Pestova, T. V. (2010) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2838 · Cited by 2,759
Calvo, S. E., Pagliarini, D. J., & Mootha, V. K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0810916106 · Cited by 914
Parkin-deficient Mice Exhibit Nigrostriatal Deficits but Not Loss of Dopaminergic Neurons
Goldberg, M. S., Fleming, S. M., Palacino, J. J., Cepeda, C., Lam, H. A., Bhatnagar, A., Meloni, E. G., Wu, N., Ackerson, L. C., Klapstein, G. J., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m308947200 · Cited by 913
Upstream ORFs are prevalent translational repressors in vertebrates
Johnstone, T. G., Bazzini, A. A., & Giraldez, A. J. (2016) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.201592759 · Cited by 346
TOR and S6K1 promote translation reinitiation of uORF‐containing mRNAs via phosphorylation of eIF3h
Schepetilnikov, M., Dimitrova, M., Mancera‐Martínez, E., Geldreich, A., Keller, M., & Ryabova, L. A. (2013) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.61 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozak, M.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-15
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5226-5232
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2116654909
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/29.24.5226
- The paper
- Kozak, M. (2001). Constraints on reinitiation of translation in mammals. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.24.5226
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.