The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis as a powerful approach to study genes under glucose repression in Bacillus subtilis
Open accessAbstract
We used 2D protein gel electrophoresis and DNA microarray technologies to systematically analyze genes under glucose repression in B:acillus subtilis. In particular, we focused on genes expressed after the shift from glycolytic to gluconeogenic at the middle logarithmic phase of growth in a nutrient sporulation medium, which remained repressed by the addition of glucose. We also examined whether or not glucose repression of these genes was mediated by CcpA, the catabolite control protein of this bacterium. The wild-type and ccpA1 cells were grown with and without glucose, and their proteomes and transcriptomes were compared. 2D gel electrophoresis allowed us to identify 11 proteins, the synthesis of which was under glucose repression. Of these proteins, the synthesis of four (IolA, I, S and PckA) was under CcpA-independent control. Microarray analysis enabled us to detect 66 glucose-repressive genes, 22 of which (glmS, acoA, C, yisS, speD, gapB, pckA, yvdR, yxeF, iolA, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, R, S and yxbF ) were at least partially under CcpA-independent control. Furthermore, we found that CcpA and IolR, a repressor of the iol divergon, were involved in the glucose repression of the synthesis of inositol dehydrogenase encoded by iolG included in the above list. The CcpA-independent glucose repression of the iol genes appeared to be explained by inducer exclusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.
Pearson, W. R., & Lipman, D. J. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.8.2444 · Cited by 11,227
The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis.
Kunst, F., Ogasawara, N., Moszer, I., Albertini, A. M., Alloni, G., Azevedo, V., Bertero, M. G., Bessières, P., Bolotin, A., Borchert, S., et al. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/36786 · Cited by 3,679
Self-citation
Cited by
Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria: many ways to make the most out of nutrients
Görke, B., & Stülke, J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1932 · Cited by 1,701
Deutscher, J., Francke, C., & Postma, P. W. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00024-06 · Cited by 1,424
Becker, J., & Wittmann, C. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201409033 · Cited by 297
Carbon Catabolite Control of the Metabolic Network in Bacillus subtilis
FUJITA, Y. (2009) · Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry · doi:10.1271/bbb.80479 · Cited by 297
Integration of Proteomics and Genomics in Platelets
McRedmond, J. P., Park, S. D., Reilly, D. F., Coppinger, J. A., Maguire, P. B., Shields, D. C., & Fitzgerald, D. J. (2004) · Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · doi:10.1074/mcp.m300063-mcp200 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoshida, K.-I.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 683-692
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2141409273
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis as a powerful approach to study genes under glucose repression in Bacillus subtilis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/29.3.683
- The paper
- Yoshida, K.-I. (2001). Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis as a powerful approach to study genes under glucose repression in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.3.683
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.