The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore
Open accessAbstract
Multiplex quantitative PCR based on novel design of fluorescent primers is described. Fluorogenic primers are labeled with a single fluorophore on a base close to the 3' end with no quencher required. A tail of 5-7 nt is added to the 5' end of the primer to form a blunt-end hairpin when the primer is not incorporated into a PCR product. This design provides a low initial fluorescence of the primers that increases up to 8-fold upon formation of the PCR product. The hairpin oligonucleotides (DeltaG from -1.6 to -5.8 kcal/mol) may be as efficient as linear primers and provide additional specificity to the PCR by preventing primer-dimers and mispriming. Multiple fluorogenic primers were designed by specialized software and used for real-time quantitation of c-myc and IL-4 cDNAs in the presence of reference genes such as beta-actin, GAPDH and 18S rRNA. Targets of 10-10(7) copies were detected with precision in PCR using FAM-labeled primers for variable genes and JOE-labeled primers for the reference genes. This method was also used to detect single nucleotide polymorphism of the human retinal degeneration gene by allele-specific PCR with end-point detection using a fluorescent plate reader or a UV-transilluminator. We conclude that fluorogenic mono-labeled primers are an efficient and cost-effective alternative to FRET-labeled oligonucleotides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison between DNA melting thermodynamics and DNA polymerase fidelity.
Petruska, J., Goodman, M. F., Boosalis, M. S., Sowers, L. C., Cheong, C., & Tinoco, I. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.17.6252 · Cited by 316
Cited by
The real-time polymerase chain reaction
Kubista, M., Andrade, J. M., Bengtsson, M., Forootan, A., Jonák, J., Lind, K., Sindelka, R., Sjöback, R., Sjögreen, B., Strömbom, L., et al. (2006) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2005.12.007 · Cited by 1,515
Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Global Health
Yager, P., Domingo, G. J., & Gerdes, J. (2008) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160524 · Cited by 1,076
Fu, T.-J., Abbott, U. R., & Hatzos, C. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf020599h · Cited by 403
Real-time RT-PCR: considerations for efficient and sensitive assay design
Peters, I. R., Helps, C. R., Hall, E. J., & Day, M. J. (2004) · Journal of Immunological Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jim.2004.01.003 · Cited by 159
Nemo‐Like Kinase Regulates Postnatal Skeletal Homeostasis
Canalis, E., Kranz, L., & Zanotti, S. (2014) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.24625 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Nazarenko, I.
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 37e-37
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- 1362-4962
- OpenAlex
- W2157463520
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/nar/30.9.e37
- The paper
- Nazarenko, I. (2002). Multiplex quantitative PCR using self-quenched primers labeled with a single fluorophore. Nucleic Acids Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.9.e37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.