Cited by 87Force Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsDNA Repair Mechanisms

Condensin extrudes DNA loops in steps up to hundreds of base pairs that are generated by ATP binding events

Open access
Ryu, Je-Kyung, Rah, Sang-Hyun, Janissen, Richard, Kerssemakers, Jacob W J, Bonato, Andrea, Michieletto, Davide, Dekker, Cees·2022·Nucleic Acids Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The condensin SMC protein complex organizes chromosomal structure by extruding loops of DNA. Its ATP-dependent motor mechanism remains unclear but likely involves steps associated with large conformational changes within the ∼50 nm protein complex. Here, using high-resolution magnetic tweezers, we resolve single steps in the loop extrusion process by individual yeast condensins. The measured median step sizes range between 20–40 nm at forces of 1.0–0.2 pN, respectively, comparable with the holocomplex size. These large steps show that, strikingly, condensin typically reels in DNA in very sizeable amounts with ∼200 bp on average per single extrusion step at low force, and occasionally even much larger, exceeding 500 bp per step. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that this is due to the structural flexibility of the DNA polymer at these low forces. Using ATP-binding-impaired and ATP-hydrolysis-deficient mutants, we find that ATP binding is the primary step-generating stage underlying DNA loop extrusion. We discuss our findings in terms of a scrunching model where a stepwise DNA loop extrusion is generated by an ATP-binding-induced engagement of the hinge and the globular domain of the SMC complex.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gkab1268

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro experiments of yeast condensin observed loop extrusion by SMC complexes at rates up to 600 bp/s, with individual step sizes having a median around 200 bp.

    “The step size of roughly 200 bp, and step frequency of 1 per 0.4 seconds, are based on values observed from in vitro experiments of yeast condensin, where the rate of loop extrusion by SMC complexes was observed to take place at rates up to 600 bp/s, with individual step sizes of the complex having a median around 200 bp.25”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Yoshimura S.H., Hizume K., Murakami A., Sutani T., Takeyasu K., Yanagida M. Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA. Curr. Biol. 2002; 12: 508– 513. 11909539
  2. [32]Bonato A., Michieletto D. An inter-strand loop extrusion model. Biophys. J. 2021; 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.015. PMC8715238 34793758 · DOI
  3. [63]Kowalczykowski S.C. Snapshots of DNA repair. Nature. 2008; 453: 463– 465. 18497811

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryu, J.-K., Rah, S.-H., Janissen, R., Kerssemakers, J. W. J., Bonato, A., Michieletto, D., & Dekker, C.
Affiliations
  • Delft University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Institute of Genetics and Cancer (GB)
Corresponding author
Dekker, Cees
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2021-12-24
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
820-832
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W3209917808
Cited by
87
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Research Council (883684, 947918)
  • Marie Sklodowska-Curie (753002)
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
condensin, SMC complex, DNA loop extrusion, ATP binding, motor mechanism, step size, chromatin organization, magnetic tweezers
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphatases, Chromatin, DNA-Binding Proteins, DNA, Fungal, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review